Jump to content

4/30: Red Sox at O's


PaulFolk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 654
  • Created
  • Last Reply
How in the world was it not a hit and run?

If Wieters is running, it better be a hit and run.

No, he was just running with the pitch, and Scott could either take or swing. A hit-and-run is when the runner takes off and the hitter HAS to swing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How in the world was it not a hit and run?

If Wieters is running, it better be a hit and run.

Did you see Martinez double clutch? Wieters beat the throw and was technically safe. To me, the steal was successful and he should try again next time he's on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he was just running with the pitch, and Scott could either take or swing. A hit-and-run is when the runner takes off and the hitter HAS to swing.

How do you know whether Scott had to swing or not?

My point is, I can't see

a) Wieters running

b) Scott swinging at a questionable pitch

Unless the hit and run is on.

Either way it was a dumb decision. Let Lackey off the hook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...