Jump to content

Xavier Avery


luismatos4prez

Recommended Posts

I like the idea of having someone that can steal a base (other then Johnson) and play some defense in the outfield on the bench. Hopefully Reimold or Chavez comes back fairly quickly and they can send Avery back down.

It makes sense, I just never would have guessed those crazy guys would have this up their sleeves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I love this move. He may not be quite ready, but that is baseball. When opportunity knocks, you gotta answer.

He provides defense and speed (that we have none of).

Anything with the bat is a plus. I have a feeling about this kid, not sure why...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of having someone that can steal a base (other then Johnson) and play some defense in the outfield on the bench. Hopefully Reimold or Chavez comes back fairly quickly and they can send Avery back down.

Chavez can take his time, no rush:)

I bet Chavez goes on one long rehab assignment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also agree with RZNJ......not a huge fan of calling him up to face James Shields.

Maybe he will just be called up for tomorrow and will sit on the bench as potential replacement on the basepath or defensive sub in the late innings and then will get his start Monday against the Yankees.

I'd much prefer that to throwing him into the lions den against James Shields although I guess if you bat him 9th and Andino 1st that wouldn't be a bad 9-1 combo as far as speed goes.

Will be very interested to see what the lineup card looks like tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a huge fan of the move. I'd rather just leave Avery in AAA to continue developing. There isn't all that much that Avery can provide right now that Flaherty can't.

Strongly disagree here. Plus D in the OF and blazing speed. He offers a lot of things that Flaherty doesn't. They are good players to have for the IF and OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strongly disagree here. Plus D in the OF and blazing speed. He offers a lot of things that Flaherty doesn't. They are good players to have for the IF and OF.

Does Avery have plus D? I know he is fast but it seems I have always read he takes poor routes. Admittedly, I haven't seen him play and am willing to be educated to the contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of having someone that can steal a base (other then Johnson) and play some defense in the outfield on the bench. Hopefully Reimold or Chavez comes back fairly quickly and they can send Avery back down.

Good point - Avery as a pinch runner off the bench in a tie ball game could be troubling to opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Avery have plus D? I know he is fast but it seems I have always read he takes poor routes. Admittedly, I haven't seen him play and am willing to be educated to the contrary.

He has appeared tohave become a good center fielder. When I saw him this spring, he made some great athletic plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point - Avery as a pinch runner off the bench in a tie ball game could be troubling to opponents.

Yep. this is a team that has been in 22 games already (out of only 34 total games) which have been decided by 3 runs or less. Having a guy who is 8 for 8 in steals - even just brings the possibility of that - could be helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...