Jump to content

A very random question


Pedro Cerrano

Recommended Posts

Why is it more advantageous? Because there are more righty pitchers? What about the shift and the fact that a ton of lefties can't hit left-handed pitchers a lick.

My dad is one of those weird guys. He said he was taught to do it because it's a couple steps closer to 1st. Apparently it makes a big difference. :noidea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Why is it more advantageous? Because there are more righty pitchers? What about the shift and the fact that a ton of lefties can't hit left-handed pitchers a lick.

It's advantageous because you have the platoon advantage 60-70% of the time, and you are a step or so closer to first base. And there's no particular reason besides tradition that we think of batting right or left handed as being tied to being right or left handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do pretty much everything lefty except throw and swing. I can swing lefty pretty well but am naturally right-handed there.

Writing, eating, shooting, guitar - all lefty. I think the only real reason I throw righty is because my parents just bought me a cheap glove from the store when I started playing and it happened to be a glove for a righty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's advantageous because you have the platoon advantage 60-70% of the time, and you are a step or so closer to first base. And there's no particular reason besides tradition that we think of batting right or left handed as being tied to being right or left handed.

Are you sure about that? I have no concrete evidence either way, but I would tend to think that a right handed person (especially a child with limited strength) would have a lot better control of the bat with the right hand higher up on the bat, along with added strength using the right leg as the plant leg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure about that? I have no concrete evidence either way, but I would tend to think that a right handed person (especially a child with limited strength) would have a lot better control of the bat with the right hand higher up on the bat, along with added strength using the right leg as the plant leg.

I have to think that the number of righties who hit lefty is pretty decent evidence that it's not much of a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here I thought I was unique because I was one of the few kids growing up in my town that threw lefty but hit righty. Anyhow, I think the reason you see more lefty hitters but righty throwers is because as already said it's seen as advantageous. I read Leigh Monville's Ted Williams biography over the winter and Ted Williams basically said he did everything in his life right-handed but hitting. A kid on my kid brother's little league team told me similar when I asked him. As for me personally, I think I just started hitting right handed because it felt more natural which is odd because I do everything else left handed. If I could do it again, I'd probably hit left handed from the start though. Fun fact but Rickey Henderson is the only bat righty/throw lefty position player in the HoF. There are others in but they're all pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dad is one of those weird guys. He said he was taught to do it because it's a couple steps closer to 1st. Apparently it makes a big difference. :noidea:

In 2011 there were 235 right handed batters who had 100+ PAs. Their median batting average was about .251. Median OPS+ was 93.

There were 153 lefties who had 100+ PAs. Their median batting average was .256. Median OPS+ was 93.

From 2000-2011 59 righties hit .325 or better, while 35 lefties did. 37% lefties among .325 hitters, while by population distribution you'd expect 39%.

Maybe there's not much to it. Although that's certainly not a definitive study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here I thought I was unique because I was one of the few kids growing up in my town that threw lefty but hit righty. Anyhow, I think the reason you see more lefty hitters but righty throwers is because as already said it's seen as advantageous. I read Leigh Monville's Ted Williams biography over the winter and Ted Williams basically said he did everything in his life right-handed but hitting. A kid on my kid brother's little league team told me similar when I asked him. As for me personally, I think I just started hitting right handed because it felt more natural which is odd because I do everything else left handed. If I could do it again, I'd probably hit left handed from the start though. Fun fact but Rickey Henderson is the only bat righty/throw lefty position player in the HoF. There are others in but they're all pitchers.

That combination is clearly a disadvantage. Unless you're a pitcher. Otherwise you've disqualified yourself from playing four of the positions in the field, and possibly put yourself at a very small disadvantage at bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That combination is clearly a disadvantage. Unless you're a pitcher. Otherwise you've disqualified yourself from playing four of the positions in the field, and possibly put yourself at a very small disadvantage at bat.

I often wonder if a player who plays the OF because they are left-handed would have been incredible in the IF if they were righty. Imagine if Johnny Damon was secretly the best defensive 2b of all time and we'd never know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That combination is clearly a disadvantage. Unless you're a pitcher. Otherwise you've disqualified yourself from playing four of the positions in the field, and possibly put yourself at a very small disadvantage at bat.

Yeah it is. I think it's somehow easier to teach a natural right hander to hit left handed than it would be a natural lefty to throw right handed. I tried playing catch right handed once as a gag and my shoulder felt sore pretty quickly. As I said, if I could do it over again, I'd probably would have just hit left handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Related to the original topic but I don't think I've ever seen a left handed knuckleball pitcher in a game ever. I've done a simplified one when throwing to my brothers in the yard and field before but I've never actually seen a lefty knuckler in the game. All the famous knucklers- Wakefield, Wilhelm, and others that I know were all right handed. Is there a mechanical reason for that or is it just coincidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I often wonder if a player who plays the OF because they are left-handed would have been incredible in the IF if they were righty. Imagine if Johnny Damon was secretly the best defensive 2b of all time and we'd never know?

Yes, it's a near certainty that there have been incredible fielders who never got the chance to play the infield because they were left-handed. Mike Squires and Don Mattingly would probably have been gold glove third basemen in Bizzarro World where they run the bases clockwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Related to the original topic but I don't think I've ever seen a left handed knuckleball pitcher in a game ever. I've done a simplified one when throwing to my brothers in the yard and field before but I've never actually seen a lefty knuckler in the game. All the famous knucklers- Wakefield, Wilhelm, and others that I know were all right handed. Is there a mechanical reason for that or is it just coincidence?

Dan Boone was a lefty knuckleballer who threw a few innings for the O's in the early 90s. I'm sure that prior to 1960 there were dozens or even hundreds of lefty knuckleballers. 1960 was roughly the dividing line between throwing knucklers as just another pitch, and the belief that you had to either be a knuckleballer or not. The Senators of the late 40s often had a rotation with 3-4 guys who threw knucklers at least sometimes.

In 1972 Wilbur Wood threw 376 2/3 innings as a left-handed knuckleballer.

This list includes over 50 lefties who threw kucklers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Boone was a lefty knuckleballer who threw a few innings for the O's in the early 90s. I'm sure that prior to 1960 there were dozens or even hundreds of lefty knuckleballers. 1960 was roughly the dividing line between throwing knucklers as just another pitch, and the belief that you had to either be a knuckleballer or not. The Senators of the late 40s often had a rotation with 3-4 guys who threw knucklers at least sometimes.

In 1972 Wilbur Wood threw 376 2/3 innings as a left-handed knuckleballer.

Interesting. Had no idea that knuckleballs were that common in the past. Wonder why it became that you had to be a knuckler ot not. Another thing I rarely see if ever are submariner starters. I remember Chad Bradford and of course now see Darren O'Day with our O's but both those guys are relievers. A guy I kind of emulated as a lefty submariner was Brad Clontz with the Braves. One of those dime a dozen relievers but I kind of liked him because he was a sidearming lefty and a Virginia native. I imagine submarine starters don't exist because doing that 100 pitches a game is different than 10-20 with a reliever. I converted from sidearm to overhand when I became a starter because the coach though I'd throw my arm out doing that starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...