Jump to content

Will the O's be willing to top 100 million for Chris Davis?


Dark Helmet

Recommended Posts

That would be the first time the team has ever reached 100 mil for a player. Most likely that is what it will take to extend Davis. I'm thinking it will take in the 6/110m range to extend. Do you bite the bullet now, or wait and maybe he's looking at 8/160+ mil. This is a tough call for the O's fo. Thats if PA is willing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I would start at 5 for 90 million, if he would accept that at the end of this year. It is a tough call because he only has a season and a piece of excellent production. On second thought, if his season ended right now he would be worth 15 or 16 million maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long is he under contract for currently? I am not willing to throw $100 mil at anyone on the team right now. That said, I don't have $100 mil to throw!

I believe he's under control through 2016. But the longer they wait the more likely he will go to FA. Then your competing with other teams. Could be looking at a 10/250 type by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think think the O's made out a lot better then the Jays in the BJ Ryan deal.

With today's market...it is superior to forget to trade. And then offer the qualifying offer. I really am not encouraged at the prospect of having our fan base complain about this for the next two and one half seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think you throw $100 mm at Chris Davis based on one season. As I've mentioned before, Davis' situation is pretty analogous to Jose Bautista's when he suddenly hit 54 HR. The team then locked him up for 5 years, $64 mm with a team option for a 6th year at $14 mm. At the time, Bautista was two years older than Davis is now, but one year closer to free agency. So, the Jays were only buying out one arbitration year, not two. The deal has been a pretty good deal for the Jays, even though Bautista is not nearly as good now as he was in his 54 HR year, and still has two seasons to go on his deal.

My sense of Davis is that it's pretty likely that he has several 40+ HR seasons in him, but I'm not convinced he's really a .300 hitter. I think Ryan Howard (also a Boras client) may be a pretty good comp here. Howard had a .313/.425/.659 season with 58 HR at age 26 (one year younger than Davis), then followed that with three more 40+ HR seasons but his slash line for those three years was .266/.363/.565. fangraphs evaluates him as a $15 mm/yr player in that time frame, and a lot less since then.

Howard's contract history is worth reviewing. He earned $10 mm, a record for a first-time arbitration eligible (Super-Two), after back to back seasons in which he hit a total of 105 HR and had OPS of 1.084 and .976. The next year he had an .881 OPS with 48 HR and the Phillies bought out his three remaining arbitration years for $54 mm. Now he's in the middle of a 5 year, $125 mm deal that is working out terribly for the Phillies.

Based on this, I think the OP is correct that it takes $100mm+ to extend Chris Davis now, with Boras as his agent. If that's what it would take, I wouldn't do it. Maybe next year. On the other hand, if Davis would sign for something like 5/$80mm, I might bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think you throw $100 mm at Chris Davis based on one season. As I've mentioned before, Davis' situation is pretty analogous to Jose Bautista's when he suddenly hit 54 HR.

Batista truly came out of nowhere after being a mediocre player. Davis was a legit prospect who is now realizing his potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Batista truly came out of nowhere after being a mediocre player. Davis was a legit prospect who is now realizing his potential.

That's why I'd pay him something like 5/$80 mm instead of the 5/$64 mm Bautista got. Remember, that includes two seasons (as opposed to Bautista's one) where Davis is not eligible for free agency, so the difference is really more than just $16 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point I hope the O's throw some big salaries for good players. Either they go out to improve the team through free agency next year or year By year sign big money to the good players they have now...like Davis, Wieters and Manny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With today's market...it is superior to forget to trade. And then offer the qualifying offer. I really am not encouraged at the prospect of having our fan base complain about this for the next two and one half seasons.

It was better for the O's to not have traded Ryan when they knew he was going to walk? I find that hard to believe. He was having a great year and could have brought back a known stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was better for the O's to not have traded Ryan when they knew he was going to walk? I find that hard to believe. He was having a great year and could have brought back a known stud.

He could have with those rules. Not today's where the team trading for the play only gets his service. Not his draft picks. Makes a difference in value. That said the Angels were stupid enough to trade Segura for a Greinke rental. So who knows. I say now, with the ability to place a Q offer, it is better to keep a guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...