Jump to content

Per Connolly: O's intensifying interest in Morales (Roch says he's hearing no)


VeveJones007

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Source: Orioles have intensified their interest in Kendrys Morales since the Jimenez signing: <a href="http://t.co/5PvFCiIn22">http://t.co/5PvFCiIn22</a></p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 399
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From Connolly's article:

Since signing right-hander Ubaldo Jimenez, the Orioles have intensified their interest in free agent designated hitter Kendrys Morales, according to a source.

The Orioles have been linked to the switch-hitting designated hitter throughout the offseason, but didn't appear to be in serious negotiations previously. That pursuit seemingly has increased in seriousness, the source said, due to two developments.

If they were to sign Morales now, the Orioles would surrender their second-rounder, roughly the 55th selection overall in 2014, which obviously is not as coveted as a first-round (or supplemental) pick.

Secondly, a shorter deal with an opt-out for Morales is potentially available for the Orioles now. Previously it was thought that the 30-year-old Morales was seeking a four- or five-year deal only, but now it appears that a two-year deal with an opt out after the first season could be in play.

One other thing that makes an opt-out contract with the Orioles logical is that if Morales were to leave the Orioles after a strong 2014 campaign, the club would undoubtedly offer him a qualifying offer. If Morales rejected it ? which he obviously would if he were choosing to opt out ? the Orioles would get a compensation pick after the first round the following year.

So essentially they would be moving up from a second-round pick in 2014 to a compensatory pick in 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, I don't want either of Morales or Cruz for more than 2 years. The more options Dan has to tweak his payroll year-to-year, the better chance we have at extending Machado, Davis, Tillman, etc.

Hopefully 2 years is all it takes but I would be ok with an option for a third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Kendrys Morales hit .364 with .972 OPS against AL East opponents and has 400 Career hits with 1100 OPS in Baltimore ... <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a></p>— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) <a href="

">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Kendrys Morales hit .364 with .972 OPS against AL East opponents and has 400 Career hits with 1100 OPS in Baltimore ... <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a></p>— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) <a href="
">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He means a .400 career average here. He definitely doesn't have 400 hits at OPACY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Kendrys Morales hit .364 with .972 OPS against AL East opponents and has 400 Career hits with 1100 OPS in Baltimore ... <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a></p>— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) <a href="
">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I am sure that the caliber of pitching he was facing had as much to do with his success at OPACY then the stadium itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...