Jump to content

MLBTRADERUMORS: Matt Moore To have the Tommy John Surgery


weams

Recommended Posts

You need to read more closely is all, I wasn't referring to having surgery in that post.

If you choose to rehab the tear, rather then have the surgery, the success rate is about 12%. The was the path that Moore hoped to take.

Ah, cheers. Makes sense, I didn't read the full article. :D

btw, I wasn't trying to be snarky with the initial post, I was genuinely curious, and for some reason my initial thought was that there was some kind of joke going on that I was not in on. And I like jokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ah, cheers. Makes sense, I didn't read the full article. :D

btw, I wasn't trying to be snarky with the initial post, I was genuinely curious, and for some reason my initial thought was that there was some kind of joke going on that I was not in on. And I like jokes.

I didn't take it that way at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, cheers. Makes sense, I didn't read the full article. :D

btw, I wasn't trying to be snarky with the initial post, I was genuinely curious, and for some reason my initial thought was that there was some kind of joke going on that I was not in on. And I like jokes.

I didn't take it that way at all.

I find this exchange funny. Maybe funny isn't the right word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That meant they paid him five times what he would have made for his first three years. With paying him half as much as he Could have made in arbitration.

The option years are probably cheap as well

Indeed they are. 7M, 9M, and finally 10M for 2019 if the Rays pick them up.

All in all, assuming they pick up all of those options, they will have paid Matt Moore about $37M for 8 years of service. Just astounding.

Compare to an ace like David Price who (assuming he walks after this year or they trade him) they will have paid about 34M for 7 years.

It's kinda like getting an entire extra season for free. Although now that he has to have Tommy John it admittedly loses a bit of its luster, but this year he is only due $1M anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed they are. 7M, 9M, and finally 10M for 2019 if the Rays pick them up.

All in all, assuming they pick up all of those options, they will have paid Matt Moore about $37M for 8 years of service. Just astounding.

Compare to an ace like David Price who (assuming he walks after this year or they trade him) they will have paid about 34M for 7 years.

It's kinda like getting an entire extra season for free. Although now that he has to have Tommy John it admittedly loses a bit of its luster, but this year he is only due $1M anyway.

But he is not an ace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An astounding deal is getting a Wei Chen for four years at 18 million.

The AAV of those two contracts are both around $4.5M, so I would argue that the longer contract (8 years for Moore) is much better.

Moore was once touted as the best pitching prospect in Rays history

(http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/matt-moore-tampa-bays-best-ever-pitching-prospect/)

So I think you have to take that into context as well when they signed the 8 year deal. It really is incredibly remarkable. But again, if Moore continues to struggle with his command and/or get injured, then obviously it becomes less impressive.....but thankfully for them the assumed risk is very very low and they can cut him after '16 without being out too much guaranteed cash if they want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he is not an ace.

Are you talking about Moore or Price in that statement?

Moore is a TOR pitcher who could start opening day for a number of clubs, including the Orioles. At worst he is a rock solid #2. Tampa was starting him 3rd because they have (had) and insane rotation. 8 yr/$37 mil is highway robbery compared to the market. And, if you doubled Chen's contract you'd get 8 yr/$36 mil which is nearly the exact number Moore is getting.

Price is an ace in every sense of the word until proven otherwise. But of course he's going through arbitration years. He could have gotten more than his $14 mil deal in arbitration if he had won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about Moore or Price in that statement?

Moore is a TOR pitcher who could start opening day for a number of clubs, including the Orioles. At worst he is a rock solid #2. Tampa was starting him 3rd because they have (had) and insane rotation. 8 yr/$37 mil is highway robbery compared to the market. And, if you doubled Chen's contract you'd get 8 yr/$36 mil which is nearly the exact number Moore is getting.

Price is an ace in every sense of the word until proven otherwise. But of course he's going through arbitration years. He could have gotten more than his $14 mil deal in arbitration if he had won.

Moores was supposed to be a TOR. He is not an Ace. He is Wei Chen. With a bum arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AAV of those two contracts are both around $4.5M, so I would argue that the longer contract (8 years for Moore) is much better.

Moore was once touted as the best pitching prospect in Rays history

(http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/matt-moore-tampa-bays-best-ever-pitching-prospect/)

So I think you have to take that into context as well when they signed the 8 year deal. It really is incredibly remarkable. But again, if Moore continues to struggle with his command and/or get injured, then obviously it becomes less impressive.....but thankfully for them the assumed risk is very very low and they can cut him after '16 without being out too much guaranteed cash if they want to.

Dylan Bundy was once touted as the best pitching Prospect in Orioles history. Stephen Strasburg was touted as well. Sometimes, a pitching prospect is all they are. We will see when it is all said and done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AAV of those two contracts are both around $4.5M, so I would argue that the longer contract (8 years for Moore) is much better.

Moore was once touted as the best pitching prospect in Rays history

(http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/matt-moore-tampa-bays-best-ever-pitching-prospect/)

So I think you have to take that into context as well when they signed the 8 year deal. It really is incredibly remarkable. But again, if Moore continues to struggle with his command and/or get injured, then obviously it becomes less impressive.....but thankfully for them the assumed risk is very very low and they can cut him after '16 without being out too much guaranteed cash if they want to.

He was an eighth round pick. Maybe he wanted to be a millionaire, for sure, at age 21. Maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about Moore or Price in that statement?

Moore is a TOR pitcher who could start opening day for a number of clubs, including the Orioles. At worst he is a rock solid #2. Tampa was starting him 3rd because they have (had) and insane rotation. 8 yr/$37 mil is highway robbery compared to the market. And, if you doubled Chen's contract you'd get 8 yr/$36 mil which is nearly the exact number Moore is getting.

Price is an ace in every sense of the word until proven otherwise. But of course he's going through arbitration years. He could have gotten more than his $14 mil deal in arbitration if he had won.

Price is an Ace. Moore is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...