Jump to content

Orioles have optioned Kevin Gausman


Greg

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Orioles have optioned Kevin Gausman to Triple-a Norfolk. Reliever likely up tomorrow.</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">June 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I REALLY HATE THIS TEAM

DavidCry.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Don't often see a team option (maybe) its best starter “<a href="https://twitter.com/Britt_Ghiroli">@Britt_Ghiroli</a>: Orioles option Gausman”</p>— keithlaw (@keithlaw) <a href="

">June 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a procedural move. Might even have something to do with Super 2. I STILL don't like it.

They must know what they are doing, but Gausman can't miss a singe start for this team. We need every quality performance we can get.

Well Roy he's gonna miss 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Would imagine Gausman will be back Friday to pitch in doubleheader. They can do that because they can use 26th man rule in split DHs</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">June 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a> could bring back gausman for friday DH vs Rays at OPACY</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">June 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Stupid move no matter when he comes back, unless it's tomorrow. Orioles prove again they have no clue about player development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This move is about service time? How could he be a super 2? He didn't even play a full season last year, and has hardly pitched this year.

This move is a head scratcher, but I guess I don't see all the in and outs like the professionals.

It's the Orioles need i say more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid move no matter when he comes back, unless it's tomorrow. Orioles prove again they have no clue about player development.
Or it shows that Duquette knows more about the rule book than we do. Now if they send him back down after the DH, then it becomes more questionable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...