Jump to content

Trade with Boston?


jgjbanker

Recommended Posts

One last post, lest I be accused of talking to myself.

Daniel Nava looks a lot like Nick Markakis to me, only cheaper.

.346 OBP (admittedly not much power), but solid defense. All in all a 3 WAR player last year in 113 games.

OK, in fairness, he's like 2/3 of Nick.....he can only hit righties...so he's a platoon target. Hmmmmm.

Nava has always been an Oriole killer. But he can't stay healthy. I'd like to get him if they aren't going to make us pay a inter division tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nava has always been an Oriole killer. But he can't stay healthy. I'd like to get him if they aren't going to make us pay a inter division tax.

If I had my pick of their surplus outfielders who are available and it wouldn't cost us much, I think I'd go for Cespedes on a one year flier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he? I thought this was just a hypothetical trade from a Hangouter?

He was mentioned yesterday in in a report on MLBtraderumors. Upon closer examination, Craig is mentioned as a good option for the O's in an article by Jason Starks. It was presented more as an alternative as opposed to something in the works. Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was mentioned yesterday in in a report on MLBtraderumors. Upon closer examination, Craig is mentioned as a good option for the O's in an article by Jason Starks. It was presented more as an alternative as opposed to something in the works. Sorry.

No apology needed, I just didn't realize his name had been thrown around in connection to us. Its good news if Duke is kicking the tires of the Sox excess outfielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way should the O's send one of their best 5 starters to the Red Sox. Let them go find their own starters. The O's shouldn't help them.

They can have Jimenez if they take all of his contract.

At some point, we're going to have to pay 10 mil plus to keep our starting pitchers other than Jimenez. O's reject Hammel just got 2/20 contract with an additional 2 mil if the Cubs don't keep him for a 3rd year at 10 mil. I won't mind Boston paying huge contracts for our veteran pitchers who have been bargains so far.

And I'm more concerned with the O's fielding a quality than anything the Sawx do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point, we're going to have to pay 10 mil plus to keep our starting pitchers other than Jimenez. O's reject Hammel just got 2/20 contract with an additional 2 mil if the Cubs don't keep him for a 3rd year at 10 mil. I won't mind Boston paying huge contracts for our veteran pitchers who have been bargains so far.

And I'm more concerned with the O's fielding a quality than anything the Sawx do.

I wouldn't trade any of these 10 m a season, except Gausman if he eventually gets to that point. But hopefully by the time he gets to that point he has become a TOR starter and we are flipping him for big time prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way should the O's send one of their best 5 starters to the Red Sox. Let them go find their own starters. The O's shouldn't help them.

They can have Jimenez if they take all of his contract.

Agree with you. Don't give the BoSox any pitching. Not even Jimenez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last post, lest I be accused of talking to myself.

Daniel Nava looks a lot like Nick Markakis to me, only cheaper.

.346 OBP (admittedly not much power), but solid defense. All in all a 3 WAR player last year in 113 games.

OK, in fairness, he's like 2/3 of Nick.....he can only hit righties...so he's a platoon target. Hmmmmm.

I do not care for Nava, I suspect that the Orioles and Red Sox have little to talk about right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't trade any of these 10 m a season' date=' except Gausman if he eventually gets to that point. But hopefully by the time he gets to that point he has become a TOR starter and we are flipping him for big time prospects.[/quote']

But you trade away the older guys due the big paychecks so that you can play the Gausmans and Davies' and Bundys.

Well, just one of the Bundys. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...