Jump to content

Smith for Matusz...?


EagleOriole

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Been brewing for awhile but hearing <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Mariners?src=hash">#Mariners</a> are Very close to trade for Seth Smith.</p>— Shannon Drayer (@shannondrayer) <a href="

">December 30, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Padres?src=hash">#Padres</a> have been trying to get RHP Brandon Mauer from the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Mariners?src=hash">#Mariners</a> in trade talks involving OF Seth Smith.</p>— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) <a href="

">December 30, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

And people thought Matusz would get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Padres?src=hash">#Padres</a> have been trying to get RHP Brandon Mauer from the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Mariners?src=hash">#Mariners</a> in trade talks involving OF Seth Smith.</p>— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) <a href="
">December 30, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

And people thought Matusz would get him.

LOL. I still think Matusz was enough. Maurer career 66 ERA+ in 2 years. Matusz 84+ career, 116 and 110 the last 2 years. Matusz was 99 and 96 ERA+ his first two years. And Maurer, as poor as he has shown thus far, still represents Padres selling Smith high coming off his career season at 32 years old. One team is hoping that a young pitcher who has performed poorly his first two years in the majors can turn it around, and the other team is hoping that a career year at 32 years of age isn't a mirage, and that $13 million for 2 years makes sense. Not understanding the tears being shed here at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think it's the money. Given what the Padres got back the O's could have matched that easily. My guess is the O's wanted them to take some money back. Or they didn't like the two years. We have all of our dollars tied up in arbitration and Ubaldo this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't believe the O's offered Matusz straight up and willing to take on Smith's contract?

I believe they would have been happy to do that but the Mariners obviously like a guy with 3 more years of service time, pre-arbitration, and probably a little more upside as a reliever, with a small chance (guess you could say the same of Matusz) of being a starter.

Don't know what the Orioles offered. As I said all along, Matusz would be plenty, IMO, but I wasn't sure that he was a fit for SD. My thoughts were more along the lines of a team's 15-20 ranked prospect, as MLB.com's Adams had suggested. Maurer looks to be right in that price range to me. As I said, I think the key for SD was to get out from under the 2/$13MM obligation to a bench bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mauer has plus stuff. He is far superior to Matusz imo. Hasn't been good as a starter (but the potential is still there) and may very well be a shutdown reliever.

The primary motivation for San Diego was obviously the thirteen million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mauer has plus stuff. He is far superior to Matusz imo. Hasn't been good as a starter (but the potential is still there) and may very well be a shutdown reliever.

This. Maurer is far more valuable than Matusz. Younger, under control longer, cheaper, plus stuff, and was already dominant as a reliever but still has the potential to stick as a starter. Matusz is a dime a dozen reliever making real money. He has very very little value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe people are actually putting Maurer and Matusz on the same level. Maurer is an actual prospect while Matusz is a bust whos out of options.

So much this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls. The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...