Jump to content

If Davis or Wieters Underperform in 2015, are they More or Less Likely to Return?


FanSince88

Davis/Wieters 2015 Underperformance = More Likely to Re-sign?  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Davis/Wieters 2015 Underperformance = More Likely to Re-sign?

    • Yes
      7
    • No
      8


Recommended Posts

If Davis or Wieters are injured or underperform in 2015, do you think that makes it more or less likely that the O's re-sign them for 2016 and beyond?

I'm personally not sure about this one. On the one hand, I could still see a rich team like the Yanks or the Dodgers overpaying for either of them just because. But on the other hand, maybe not, and maybe their prices come down enough for the O's to re-sign them -- assuming they're willing to believe that they would improve in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me emphasize that I am not wishing for this to happen. Even if it means we lose both, I'd much rather see them have a healthy and productive 2015. Because if that happens, I believe it's overwhelmingly probable that the O's make the playoffs. Frankly unless the pitching completely implodes, I am hard-pressed to see the O's missing the playoffs if Davis and Wieters have good years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that how they perform will determine only whether or not the O's make a qualifying offer. I don't expect either player to be back next season, though I think it makes sense for the O's and Wieters to negotiate a one-year extension now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does that make sense for Wieters?

In case he's not able to rack up many innings behind the plate this season, it would give him and opportunity to prove he's back while working with a staff he knows. Otherwise, he might have to take a 1-year deal with another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case he's not able to rack up many innings behind the plate this season, it would give him and opportunity to prove he's back while working with a staff he knows. Otherwise, he might have to take a 1-year deal with another team.

Matt will get a multi year deal with a team that over pays his production, no matter if he plays a healthy inning this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they perform well. If not I suspect it's going to be a tough season. If they perform well I feel we will have a very good season. My guess though is if they perform well they will become overpaid and are far less likely to return. Even if they do not perform at a level that is high someone could still overpay and we could still lose them. I would rather see them perform extremely well and take the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their performance doesn't affect our chances at all, IMO. Which are near 0%.

If they perform or over perform we can't afford them.

If they underperform DD won't pay 10+ million on them.

I hate to be negative but NEITHER will be here next year. (unless they accept the QO)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...