Jump to content

I don't want to see Wieters playing for the O's until.......


wildcard

Recommended Posts

he can throw and hit as well as Caleb Joseph.

When Matt Wieters returns he will no doubt take playing time away from Joseph. I am fine with that as long as he can hit and throw as well as Joseph. If Wieters can't then he belongs on the DL.

Caleb's defense and throwing are solid. Wieters needs to be recovered enough to not lower the bar the Joseph has set. Though Joseph offense is bound to lessen as the season moves on, Wieters needs to be at least hit as well as Joseph is hitting before Wieters returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

As far as I'm concerned, he only needs to be able to replace Lavarnway. Let him play one game a week, then two, and so forth until he's fully back. Hopefully, he'll be swinging the bat well enough to be a bat off the bench when needed, something Lavarnway doesn't provide. If he can't supplant Joseph because he's still hitting like a monster, that's another issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned, he only needs to be able to replace Lavarnway. Let him play one game a week, then two, and so forth until he's fully back. Hopefully, he'll be swinging the bat well enough to be a bat off the bench when needed, something Lavarnway doesn't provide. If he can't supplant Joseph because he's still hitting like a monster, that's another issue.

Yes ...I'm thinking this as well. But I'm certain Wieters would be very unhappy playing 1 game per week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he can throw and hit as well as Caleb Joseph.

When Matt Wieters returns he will no doubt take playing time away from Joseph. I am fine with that as long as he can hit and throw as well as Joseph. If Wieters can't then he belongs on the DL.

Caleb's defense and throwing are solid. Wieters needs to be recovered enough to not lower the bar the Joseph has set. Though Joseph offense is bound to lessen as the season moves on, Wieters needs to be at least hit as well as Joseph is hitting before Wieters returns.

Do you not trust Buck? Or Dan Duquette? Why would you think that they'd start Wieters every day over Joseph if Wieters wasn't the option they thought was going to win the most games? And in any case, I hope you're not suggesting that they sit Wieters until such time as Joseph's number just return to reality. Yes, he's 9-for-24, but obviously that's not representative of his ability (well, unless you're interpreting that .375 average as a typical short-term variation around his low-200s true talent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With so many guys in their walk years it will be a touchy juggling job for Buck

If Wieters doesn't make it back and play the majority of the games it will literally cost him 10's of millions of dollars. Same deal with moving Norris to the bullpen for Gausman, or benching Davis for Pearce.

Unfortunately Wieters will have to be real bad to not take the majority of the starts from Joseph. I am concerned about the negative impact his pitch framing will have on the whole staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you not trust Buck? Or Dan Duquette? Why would you think that they'd start Wieters every day over Joseph if Wieters wasn't the option they thought was going to win the most games? And in any case, I hope you're not suggesting that they sit Wieters until such time as Joseph's number just return to reality. Yes, he's 9-for-24, but obviously that's not representative of his ability (well, unless you're interpreting that .375 average as a typical short-term variation around his low-200s true talent).

We still got about a month or more before Wieters makes it back. We shall see if Joseph is back to his normal hitting range by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With so many guys in their walk years it will be a touchy juggling job for Buck

If Wieters doesn't make it back and play the majority of the games it will literally cost him 10's of millions of dollars. Same deal with moving Norris to the bullpen for Gausman, or benching Davis for Pearce.

Unfortunately Wieters will have to be real bad to not take the majority of the starts from Joseph. I am concerned about the negative impact his pitch framing will have on the whole staff.

It's... interesting... that so many of you think that the Orioles will prioritize (or will have great difficulty prioritizing) future contracts, egos, emotions, veteranocity and individual wants over winning baseball games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's... interesting... that so many of you think that the Orioles will prioritize (or will have great difficulty prioritizing) future contracts, egos, emotions, veteranocity and individual wants over winning baseball games.

I agree with you.

Buck wants to win and he has said repeatedly over the years. I will play the guys that I think give me the best chance to so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's... interesting... that so many of you think that the Orioles will prioritize (or will have great difficulty prioritizing) future contracts, egos, emotions, veteranocity and individual wants over winning baseball games.

What's interesting is the scenario where Buck feels it is more or less a wash between Wieters and Joseph. In that scenario, are we better off returning Wieters to being the primary catcher so he can build value and hopefully yield us a comp pick when he declares free agency, or are we better off making Joseph the primary catcher (or splitting duties 50/50), which helps Joseph accumulate experience that he can use while he remains under team control for the five years after this one, while depressing Wieters' FA value to the point where we might be able to keep him?

Having posed that hypothetical, I doubt Buck will feel it is more or less a wash between Wieters and Joseph. Buck thinks Wieters walks on water. I've also been struck by some of the hero-worshipping things that Joseph has said about Wieters:

"It's really weird because I've been in big league camp with him for five years," Joseph said. "I had such an exciting time watching him catch for the first time just because it's really beautiful when he does it. He's just so good at what he does and I like to learn by watching him each and every day. He does something every day. 'I wonder if I can try that and do that.'

"Hopefully, when he comes back, it's really soon. It's going to be fun to be on the same team. We were basically on the same team last year, but it's different when you're watching a guy play versus listening to a guy talk. It will be fun, interesting, and I'll be excited for it."

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/03/caleb-joseph-on-his-latest-opportunity.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aside from his short time in the MiL, the production has never matched the hype. I'm no Wieters hater, but I'm in no hurry to see him get back. I think Joseph is more valuable behind the plate.

Slight disagreement with you.

At least in my opinion

His bat never lived up to the hype.

But, he was a dang good catcher behind the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slight disagreement with you.

At least in my opinion

His bat never lived up to the hype.

But, he was a dang good catcher behind the plate.

I am not saying Wieters is a bad catcher, not at all. I think he is well above average behind the plate, and prior to the injury had a great throwing arm. I just think Joseph is better. I think Jospeh calls a much better game. Wieters bat is not good enough to supplant Jospeh's superior D, JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...