Jump to content

Long Term Orioles Infield plans


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

I heard this the other day listening to 105.7

The guy was talking like 2017 season, he threw out the idea of moving Schoop to Third, with his cannon of an arm, moving Manny to SS, and moving Hardy to 2nd.

Intriguing for sure.

Manny to SS isn't something new and has been thrown out before.

I guess I always thought Hardy moving to third, like Cal did.

But, this has some merit to it, doesnt it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I heard this the other day listening to 105.7

The guy was talking like 2017 season, he threw out the idea of moving Schoop to Third, with his cannon of an arm, moving Manny to SS, and moving Hardy to 2nd.

Intriguing for sure.

Manny to SS isn't something new and has been thrown out before.

I guess I always thought Hardy moving to third, like Cal did.

But, this has some merit to it, doesnt it?

Not wanting to take Manny of 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard this the other day listening to 105.7

The guy was talking like 2017 season, he threw out the idea of moving Schoop to Third, with his cannon of an arm, moving Manny to SS, and moving Hardy to 2nd.

Intriguing for sure.

Manny to SS isn't something new and has been thrown out before.

I guess I always thought Hardy moving to third, like Cal did.

But, this has some merit to it, doesnt it?

Dumb idea. You can't assume a great 2b would be a great 3b a great 3b would be a great ss and an aging ss would be a good 2b. Changing one guy is questionable, changing three sounds like chaos. This is real life, not a video game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few year ago, I toyed with the idea of JJ to 2B with Machado at SS, but Schoop changes the equation. Machado/Schoop DP is too big. And I agree with brianod's post above.

Many SS make the move to 3B as they get older. Well Machado would probably be worth more at SS, better range, great hitting for SS. I guess my question becomes, would JJ's bat play at 3B. Cal/Arod types were better hitters... I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nor am I, but at some point, its probably going to happen.

Why would you guys be against moving him to SS? On one hand, I get if it aint broke etc... but do you think he wouldn't excel there?

EDIT: Reason being, wouldn't he be worth more at SS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Manny can play SS anywhere close to the level that he plays 3B (I think he can) then he should be moved there as soon as JJ Hardy is gone. Hit bat would be so much more valuable at that position.

In 2018 I would like to see Manny at SS, Schoop at 2B, and us sign/trade a player for third. It's possible that Chance Sisco could be converted to that position from Catcher so we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb idea. You can't assume a great 2b would be a great 3b a great 3b would be a great ss and an aging ss would be a good 2b. Changing one guy is questionable, changing three sounds like chaos. This is real life, not a video game.

Buck said it was easier for guys on the left side of the infield to move over and play on the right side of the diamond.

Schoop has a cannon and third base is not an unknown position, granted something you wouldn't do, unless you had time in ST to give him lots of rep there.

Old School was, if the guy was good enough to play SS, his glove could play anyway.

So not sure, this is a "dumb" ideal.

Maybe not a 5 star brilliant plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you guys be against moving him to SS? On one hand, I get if it aint broke etc... but do you think he wouldn't excel there?

EDIT: Reason being, wouldn't he be worth more at SS?

my own opinion and why I am against him moving to SS.

His glove at third is elite and some could argue one of the best in the league right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my own opinion and why I am against him moving to SS.

His glove at third is elite and some could argue one of the best in the league right now.

Well right, but is the thought that he wouldn't field as well at SS? Or is it just if it aint broke, don't fix it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard this the other day listening to 105.7

The guy was talking like 2017 season, he threw out the idea of moving Schoop to Third, with his cannon of an arm, moving Manny to SS, and moving Hardy to 2nd.

Intriguing for sure.

Manny to SS isn't something new and has been thrown out before.

I guess I always thought Hardy moving to third, like Cal did.

But, this has some merit to it, doesnt it?

I think it's somewhat unlikely that the O's have three excellent defenders, but if they'd just shuffle them around to other positions they'd get even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Manny can play SS anywhere close to the level that he plays 3B (I think he can) then he should be moved there as soon as JJ Hardy is gone. Hit bat would be so much more valuable at that position.

In 2018 I would like to see Manny at SS, Schoop at 2B, and us sign/trade a player for third. It's possible that Chance Sisco could be converted to that position from Catcher so we will see.

It's very risky to assume that plus defensive players at one position will seamlessly transition to plus defensive players at another position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish the Orioles would have drafted Rendon instead of Bundy in 2011. They could have just let Hardy go after last year and had an infield of Rendon at 3B, Manny at short and Schoop at second. And with the money saved from the Hardy contract, they could go after a top bat this off-season to improve this offense. Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but at some point Hardy is going to be able to stay at a plus defender at SS.

When Hardy is no longer a good defensive shortstop he's no longer a major league regular. His bat won't support regular playing time at any other position. At least on a good team that doesn't want to carry a poor player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Eh, noise. IDGAF anyway, having cut the cord long ago. I know the feeling though… Dish pulled that BS a couple years ago. I’m hoping Rubenstein can find a way to ala carte everything. There will certainly be demand.
    • I haven’t seen this mentioned anywhere, but Irvin morphed his slider into a cutter last year that is by far his best pitch by Stuff+. He threw it 16% of the time too, decent usage but could be increased more. He’s always going to score poorly in stuff for pitch models but very well in command grades, so even some slight upticks in stuff could make a big difference. His curve is also decent. He relies a lot on his fastball/sinker/change, so I’d be interested in him moving more towards the cutter/curve (which generally are still effective against RH batters). Irvin was absolutely unreal horrific in his first few starts last season, which tanked his season numbers (particularly xERA), but really righted the ship after that. He’s a decent piece to be a 5th starter, he’s been very durable, throws a lot of strikes and as a result can pitch a lot of innings (if you aren’t pulling him early in close games), and is a good fit for OPACY. It’s just a bad spot that our depth chart is already whittled down to him being that to start the year. 
    • Things aren’t looking good for MASN and comcast.     Would still figure they find a way to get a deal done but it doesn’t seem as certain as I think it was.
    • Verlander needs 140 IP and a clean doctor's note to assure himself of 1/35 next season but if he misses that I could see him somewhere on Elias' target list for the year over year Lyles-Gibson-Kimbrel 1-year contract stretch. Its a bit of an art question for baseball how it wants to grapple with all Friedman and Driveline have brought to the game.    Roki Sasaki or Paul Skenes or even Grayson Rodriguez might be their generation's Justin Verlander but today's game will constrain them from revealing it as fully to baseball fans even if they are. Verlander has become a TJ statistic in recent years, but for me he really isn't - every bit of work on his Hall of Fame plaque was done before the surgeon took some of him.
    • Buried in the article, but it says this:   “Verlander said he heard at the trade deadline that the Dodgers and Orioles were interested, and he said he’d have accepted Los Angeles or even Baltimore if those were the options. “I’m from Virginia,” Verlander said. But when Houston, where he’d won his rings, became viable, he said he was happy to “steer things” that way.”
    • Has the added benefit of being on the 40-man already, so nobody necessarily needs to be removed for him to come up as a reliever later in the season.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...