Jump to content

Front Office issues


eddie83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So if you are a business owner and have a valued employee with tons of proprietary information under contract and it comes to your attention that the employee is talking to one of your competitors behind your back with the intention of jumping ship and then probably trying to hire away a bunch of your other employees you would be fine with him just leaving?

No,but you might get rid of him and sign an agreement that he can't work for a competitor for a few years. Companies usually don't want those people in their organization because it usually ends ugly .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No,but you might get rid of him and sign an agreement that he can't work for a competitor for a few years. Companies usually don't want those people in their organization because it usually ends ugly .

Which would be fine, but you don't just say, Sure go ahead, good luck!

Not when it is a direct competitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree completely.

Even the great choices sometime bomb.

And I don't think teams even truly know who the great choices are. Outside of the "Top Ten Future GMs" pieces periodically run...which are usually the author's sources/friends...who usually write-up their own bios for said piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be able to tell if that is the case.

If he is that type of person why would you promote him to that level to begin with?

Who would have thought this scenario would ever happen though? How many of these types of positions in the entire sport exist?

I get why Angelos did what he did, all I care about is can this all work going foward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another article about Buck and Dan having tension as well as execs upset that Dan wasn't compensated for not going to Toronto. Execs say it was bush league that he wasn't allowed to leave. Also talk of budget.

If there are issues they need to be resolved now. This talk isn't healthy.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/09/19/ben-cherington-sees-fruits-his-labor-from-afar/CECkc8QALvvq4UOuI03GKJ/story.html

I can't find this article that you're referring to.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The link you just quoted still works fine for me. MLB Trade Rumors has it up as well.
Found it. I didn't scroll down far enough.

I'm not commenting on much of anything here. There are a lot of "major league sources say" and "it has been said" and similar sorts of non-sources. I understand that some sources give information only on the condition of anonymity but when the vast majority of sources are "people say," etc. it weakens the credibility of the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if you are a business owner and have a valued employee with tons of proprietary information under contract and it comes to your attention that the employee is talking to one of your competitors behind your back with the intention of jumping ship and then probably trying to hire away a bunch of your other employees you would be fine with him just leaving?

Top employees leave all the time. The good ones have non-competes - which generally don't prevent one from working for a competitor - just that the employee can't bring over proprietary information or go after customers for a period of time.

Still, it's not a good analogy because DD was offered a promotion, significant long term job security and presumably a large raise. In baseball, it is normal operating procedure for teams to let go of employees offered such opportunities by other organizations. And it's not like the Os didn't poach DeMacio from the Braves or Jordan from the Marlins. This kind of stuff happens all the time and I think it is somewhat unusual for a baseball owner to deny an employee a desired job somewhere else.

I do agree it is not cool to see a successful GM of the Os poached by a division rival, but that's why there was some significant compensation discussed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the rub.

If the Blue Jays had done this whole process correctly and started their search and announced their intent at the end of the season last year and the O's refused to let DD pursue that opportunity when it is an accepted practice to let guys do so.........then to me that would have been totally bush league.

The Blue Jays instead got cute about it, waited till the winter meetings while we are scrambling to figure out who is coming, going blah blah blah to announce their intent and then preceded to act like awwww shucks when asked to explain....Why now?

The Blue Jays were in the wrong. PA was right to refuse the request. You do not get "traditional" considerations given about letting guys move up when the team trying to get the guy ignores all the "traditional conventions" about how to go about doing such a thing.

I don't get why the O's are the bad guy here and I personally think this tension over it is hog wash. DD is smart enough to know what the Jays did was bush league, he is also smart enough to take the giant raise and security associated with that bush league move if it worked out....if not....I doubt he has this lingering grudge.

If there is tension there its coming from the other direction (ownership) and I doubt that is the case also. PA is a lawyer, businessman and has been around long enough to know that a guy who does not consider a huge raise and promotion regardless of the events that led to such offer, is a guy who lacks the ambition to be successful in today's cut throat business world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found it. I didn't scroll down far enough.

I'm not commenting on much of anything here. There are a lot of "major league sources say" and "it has been said" and similar sorts of non-sources. I understand that some sources give information only on the condition of anonymity but when the vast majority of sources are "people say," etc. it weakens the credibility of the article.

I agree, in spades. This is crap journalism. When Cafardo says "There's been talk of friction between Duquette and [buck]," he could be referring to comments on this board.

Last week, the same "reporter" had a piece on how terrific it would be for the Sox to sign Chris Davis, calling him a "guaranteed 40/40 guy" who can play four positions (including LF, where Chris has 11 ML games) and listing 11 potential bidders for him, that reads like it was written by Scott Boras. https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/09/16/onball/eK09bwWLhyJrvOgA8qeUxI/story.html

There may well be problems between Duquette and the owner or manager based on the events of last December, the team's disappointing play and record, the waste of precious payroll dollars on guys who were released, Parra's lackluster performance, the emergence of Arrieta, etc., etc. But IMO this article doesn't add a thing to what we know or surmise about those problems and their potential effect on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the rub.

If the Blue Jays had done this whole process correctly and started their search and announced their intent at the end of the season last year and the O's refused to let DD pursue that opportunity when it is an accepted practice to let guys do so.........then to me that would have been totally bush league.

The Blue Jays instead got cute about it, waited till the winter meetings while we are scrambling to figure out who is coming, going blah blah blah to announce their intent and then preceded to act like awwww shucks when asked to explain....Why now?

The Blue Jays were in the wrong. PA was right to refuse the request. You do not get "traditional" considerations given about letting guys move up when the team trying to get the guy ignores all the "traditional conventions" about how to go about doing such a thing.

I don't get why the O's are the bad guy here and I personally think this tension over it is hog wash. DD is smart enough to know what the Jays did was bush league, he is also smart enough to take the giant raise and security associated with that bush league move if it worked out....if not....I doubt he has this lingering grudge.

If there is tension there its coming from the other direction (ownership) and I doubt that is the case also. PA is a lawyer, businessman and has been around long enough to know that a guy who does not consider a huge raise and promotion regardless of the events that led to such offer, is a guy who lacks the ambition to be successful in today's cut throat business world.

YES, except I don't think they got cute, they were totally inept -- which set forth a chain of events that made things suddenly unfortunate for us. Remember, the Jays also spoke to the CWS guy directly. They also "consulted" the NYY for what to do.

If Dan wanted to leave, I came around to that, but the Jays don't just get to tamper with something so big and skate.

You can't unring a bell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...