Jump to content

Offseason Rumors and Deals Around MLB


neveradoubt

Recommended Posts

How do the Orioles win by taking on $18M in additional future year commitments while signing on to play a 32-year-old corner outfielder who only got to two wins at 31 by accumulating about 700 PAs? I like Nick as much as the next O's fan, but if his BABIP regresses to his career mark and he stays powerless he'll hit .270 and put up a sub-.700 OPS.

Not if the next fan happens to be Frobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
How do the Orioles win by taking on $18M in additional future year commitments while signing on to play a 32-year-old corner outfielder who only got to two wins at 31 by accumulating about 700 PAs? I like Nick as much as the next O's fan, but if his BABIP regresses to his career mark and he stays powerless he'll hit .270 and put up a sub-.700 OPS.
Not if the next fan happens to be Frobby.
That is true. Somewhere on the intertubes there is a picture of Frobby, me, and Tony standing next to each other so Frobby may actually be the next O's fan.

It is my assumption that Nick's BABIP will regress next season. But it's also my assumption that he will have some modest power gains. His Marcel projection for next year (which is the only one I've seen to date) is .275/.342/.377. That's very close to what he did in 2014 (.276/.342/.386). That seems like a reasonable guess to me, though I'd certainly acknowledge that a sub-.700 OPS is not out of the question (see 2013).

While the fan part of me would love to see Nick back in Baltimore, the analyst part of me just wants to see better performance in the corner OF spots than we saw in 2015, no matter who is out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my assumption that Nick's BABIP will regress next season. But it's also my assumption that he will have some modest power gains. His Marcel projection for next year (which is the only one I've seen to date) is .275/.342/.377. That's very close to what he did in 2014 (.276/.342/.386). That seems like a reasonable guess to me, though I'd certainly acknowledge that a sub-.700 OPS is not out of the question (see 2013).

While the fan part of me would love to see Nick back in Baltimore, the analyst part of me just wants to see better performance in the corner OF spots than we saw in 2015, no matter who is out there.

Calm down, no need to be defensive. I was just saying you are more fond of Nick then your average Oriole fan. Nothing wrong with that. No justification needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my assumption that Nick's BABIP will regress next season. But it's also my assumption that he will have some modest power gains. His Marcel projection for next year (which is the only one I've seen to date) is .275/.342/.377. That's very close to what he did in 2014 (.276/.342/.386). That seems like a reasonable guess to me, though I'd certainly acknowledge that a sub-.700 OPS is not out of the question (see 2013).

While the fan part of me would love to see Nick back in Baltimore, the analyst part of me just wants to see better performance in the corner OF spots than we saw in 2015, no matter who is out there.

I wouldn't be too surprised by some power gains. But there's also the .291 BABIP from '13. Plug that into his 2015 line and he hits .250-something. Everyone gets old. It's just a matter of when.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my assumption that Nick's BABIP will regress next season. But it's also my assumption that he will have some modest power gains. His Marcel projection for next year (which is the only one I've seen to date) is .275/.342/.377. That's very close to what he did in 2014 (.276/.342/.386). That seems like a reasonable guess to me, though I'd certainly acknowledge that a sub-.700 OPS is not out of the question (see 2013).

While the fan part of me would love to see Nick back in Baltimore, the analyst part of me just wants to see better performance in the corner OF spots than we saw in 2015, no matter who is out there.

I'm shocked that you do not have more faith in Nick. This is the first off season in a while that Nick has been healthy. I expect that he will workout and gain strength this off season. There is a good chance he has his best year since 2012 next year.

What Nick does next year will depend a lot on where they ask him to hit. If he hits first he will keep a high OBP. If they hit him third he will work more on driving in runs. That's the Nick I know.

Don't read this to say that I believe the O's should reacquire Nick. I don't think the O's can afford him. The O's need to add younger players.

I just thought you would be higher on Nick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calm down, no need to be defensive. I was just saying you are more fond of Nick then your average Oriole fan. Nothing wrong with that. No justification needed.

Did I sound defensive? Honestly, I don't mind being kidded about my man-crush on Nick. I was just giving my opinion on the issue of bringing him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm shocked that you do not have more faith in Nick. This is the first off season in a while that Nick has been healthy. I expect that he will workout and gain strength this off season. There is a good chance he has his best year since 2012 next year.

What Nick does next year will depend a lot on where they ask him to hit. If he hits first he will keep a high OBP. If they hit him third he will work more on driving in runs. That's the Nick I know.

Don't read this to say that I believe the O's should reacquire Nick. I don't think the O's can afford him. The O's need to add younger players.

I just thought you would be higher on Nick.

Oh, I think it is entirely possible that he will have his best year since 2012. .290/.350/.415 would not surprise me. But .275/.330/.370 also wouldn't surprise me. I think Nick's days of having a .173 ISO are probably over, considering he's been in the .080-.110 range each of the last three years. If he got to .125 ISO I'd consider that a bounce-back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff Todd

The Mariners are “trying hard” to find a taker for veteran outfielder/first baseman/DH Mark Trumbo with tomorrow’s non-tender deadline looming, according to reports from Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports (on Twitter) and Bob Dutton of the Tacoma News Tribune (Twitter link). It’s previously been reported that many rival executives expect Trumbo to be dealt. The Rockies are among the clubs that have spoken with Seattle GM Jerry Dipoto about the slugger, per Rosenthal.

Trumbo, who’ll turn 30 before the season, is projected by MLBTR to take home a $9.1MM salary in his final season of arbitration eligibility. Though he’s generally continued to produce at better than the league-average rate on offense, and remains a significant power threat in particular, the right-handed hitter has not quite matched his early-career batting levels.

Considering his significant defensive limitations and hefty earning power, Trumbo’s trade value would not appear to be peaking at the moment. (That moment probably came when then-Angels GM Dipoto acquired promising young lefties Tyler Skaggs and Hector Santiago in exchange for Trumbo before the start of the 2014 season.) Trumbo has never cracked three wins above replacement in his career, whether by measure of Fangraphs or Baseball-Reference, and ended up as about a one to one-and-a-half win player last season.

Of course, teams may still be willing to roll the dice on Trumbo cranking his power output back up over a one-year commitment. He averaged over thirty home runs annually from 2011 through 2013, after all, which represents a fairly rare demonstration of playable pop. While he is roundly considered a sub-par defender in the corner outfield, his ability to play there at least increases his versatility. And Trumbo has rated rather well as a first baseman over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be too surprised by some power gains. But there's also the .291 BABIP from '13. Plug that into his 2015 line and he hits .250-something. Everyone gets old. It's just a matter of when.

That would normally be after they are young, Cotton. :wedge:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm shocked that you do not have more faith in Nick. This is the first off season in a while that Nick has been healthy. I expect that he will workout and gain strength this off season. There is a good chance he has his best year since 2012 next year.

What Nick does next year will depend a lot on where they ask him to hit. If he hits first he will keep a high OBP. If they hit him third he will work more on driving in runs. That's the Nick I know.

Don't read this to say that I believe the O's should reacquire Nick. I don't think the O's can afford him. The O's need to add younger players.

I just thought you would be higher on Nick.

Everyone gets old. It's just a matter of when. A large majority of players are worse at 32 than 29. And most players get less healthy as they age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, Horsepower is right - a #3 is not a TOR starter. And so when DD throws in"TOR" and defines it with "a #3," he's just cutting himself - and the entire Orioles organization - some verbal slack for the moment when we all wake up on opening day and realize that Yovani Gallardo was the best we did...

For a team already stacked with #3s and #4s, a TOR would be a refreshing presence. Tillman, Gausman, Jimenez, Gonzalez (assuming Chen is gone)... Which of these guys strikes you as a TOR? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?

Gausman or Tillman or Jimenez could be a TOR starter. They have the talent. Will they realize it? It is up to them.

Yovani Gallardo is bascially Miguel Gonzales with more IP per year and a longer MLB track record and a much bigger paycheck.

I don't mind bringing him in, the rotaion needs as many above average starters as it can get and his durability is a big need as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
    • The most obvious player to extend is Gunnar, his agent is Boras, which means most likely, he will not be interested in an extension.  All others, you have to wait and see.  Adley after that horrible second half, you really need to see if he bounces back.  Westburg, need a full season before locking him up, plus he would probably want a season to post big numbers.  Cowser, wait and see if he learns the strike zone before extending.  
    • I agree with you on Gunnar. I'd wait on Westburg until he puts up a Gunnar like season, and spend money on Burnes this offseason. Oh and do something temporary to bring the RF wall in 10-15 feet
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...