Jump to content

The Case for P. Alvarez


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

Olney confirms that Boras is going to play the waiting game with Alvarez, as expected. I wonder if Boras is willing to wait into the season and he starts missing games? If we get through most of ST and an opportunity hasn't opened up, he may come back to us. Even then I doubt the Orioles will spend the money on him, as much as I want them to, because they'll don't want to lose Reimold or Rickard.

Pedro Alvarez will seemingly wait to if any additional opportunities present themselves during Spring Training before signing, as ESPN?s Buster Olney wrote in yesterday?s blog post (Insider required). Olney texted agent Scott Boras about his client and was met with the following reply: ?Waiting for the best situation. As with all valued players the demand increases as spring training begins.? Interest in the defensively challenged Alvarez has been tepid thus far, but spring injuries often do create opportunities for players seeking a home. An injury to a club?s designated hitter or first baseman could create a suitor for Alvarez that doesn?t presently exist.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/02/rockies-interest-ian-desmond-minimal.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Getting Alvarez would be like when we brought in Eric Davis for the 96' team. For those that can remember, I barely can sense I was like 13. We found him AB's. People are going to get hurt. Especially when you consider that Reimold and Kim are penciled into get all the LF AB's.

I think he'd sign with us. Buck would hide his weaknesses, get him AB's, and he'd get to hit in a stacked lineup, that is good for LH's.

Let's say it's a 1/3 deal with incentives. I think it's a good fit for both sides. The Yanks, BOS, Tor, and Baltimore are all teams that will be looking for DH's next year. And those are the teams that jump out at me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

o

(POSTED ON FEBRUARY 12th)

The consensus opinion appears to be that the Orioles will be done adding hitters once they land one of Fowler, Bruce, or P. Alvarez. I'm not saying it's realistic, and who knows what our payroll restrictions are at this point, but I think there's a compelling case to add P. Alvarez even if we do land Fowler.

Upsides

1. The Orioles still have only Davis and Kim as LH hitters on their ML roster who project to be better vs. RHP than LHP. Wieters and Fowler are better vs. LHP. (Ignoring Flaherty for these purposes). Alvarez crushes RHP, with a career wRC+ of 118.

2. We are assuming that Kim can step in and play LF at the major league level. Our backup plan is a revolving door made up of the likes of Reimold, Rickard, Navarro, Urrutia, Hoes, and D. Alvarez. Navarro and Urrutia are the only LH hitters and they look to be replacement level, at best, in the strong side of a platoon. The RH hitters would all be over-exposed as everyday players.

3. Davis and Trumbo both have experience in the OF. In effect, Alvarez provides the backup for all 3 OF positions (Fowler can cover CF), 1B, and DH. 7 players for 5 positions, with one of them being a RH platoon partner for Kim/Alvarez getting very few ABs, means there are still plenty of ABs to go around. An injury to any of the 4 every day players, or Kim, means Alvarez gets full playing time vs RHP. He'd probably get 400 AB's over the course of the season.

4. Alvarez has almost no market, and can likely be had for $3-4MM, and at most $5MM. Carter got a $2.5MM deal, so Alvarez is going to want to eclipse that, but outside of that, he has no bargaining power, with an extraordinarily weak market:

-No NL team will want him / can offer him as much playing time unless they want to make their incumbent 1B part of platoon or play them in the OF part time. Alvarez is also a horrible 1B defensively. Only the Padres and Rockies even look like conceivable fits to me, with no rumored interest.

-The AL teams have very few incumbent DH who can play elsewhere, again with no rumored interest. Only the Indians look like they could use him in a platoon with their 1B, Napoli, who they gave a large $7MM contract this offseason.

Downsides

1. We can't keep both Rickard and Reimold on the 25-man roster if everybody is healthy. I think this downside is mitigated by many factors, namely:

-We only need one RH bench OF to platoon with Kim/Alvarez. The other won't be getting playing time anyway.

-We can likely keep Reimold by having no team want to claim him due to his contract, and sending him to the minors. Alternatively, we can cut him before the season for a small loss.

-There's a good chance that one projected player for the 25-man roster won't be healthy to start the season anyway, and it won't be an issue until further down the road.

-Even if we lose one of Rickard or Reimold, we have Hoes and D. Alvarez in the minors as RH corner OF. Plenty of depth as RH platoon OF, and only one projected platoon they need to cover.

2. One of Davis/Trumbo has to play in the OF much of the time in order to start Alvarez. This is an unsavory reality, and the only real downside IMO, with a few smaller mitigating factors:

-Kim may not be a better OF than Davis/Trumbo anyway.

-Davis/Trumbo might get hurt.

-Fowler may not have the arm for RF, in which case playing him in LF and Davis/Trumbo in RF (who have good/decent arms) lessens the blow of having them out there.

-Even if everybody is healthy and playing well, Alvarez can carve out some playing time by pinch hitting and starting against tough RHP instead of Trumbo.

Summary

Alvarez could be a huge upgrade to the bench, at a bargain price. He profiles very well offensively for OPACY and provides depth at an area in which we have very little as a LH hitter. He'd play the role that many currently envision for Jimmy Paredes except that he's, you know, good (and Paredes is likely a 40 man casualty anyway). The downside of Davis/Trumbo seeing more OF time is worth the upside of having him. If there's a few more bills burning a hole in PA's pocket even after we add Gallardo and Fowler, Alvarez would still be a quality addition IMO.

You made the case.

It was done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...