Jump to content

Evaluating the Gallardo Contract


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

If we add $20mil to Gallardo's contract to compensate for the lack of draft pick, we get 3/55.

* I'm convinced it would have taken 5/100 to get Chen signed here, in a hitter friendly league, hitter-friendly division, and hitter-friendly ballpark, without an opt out. Oh, and let's tack another $5 mil on to that to cover the loss of the comp pick for Chen. Ahem. So the Gallardo deal is nearly half the price and nearly half the time commitment as a Chen deal would have been. Gallardo may not be as good as Chen, but you've gotta think he'll be at least two-thirds as good. I'd say we head-to-head I'd rather take the Gallardo deal.

But that said...

* Ugh, we probably could have had Kazmir for 3/60. Sure, $5mil more than Gallardo but we did need a lefty starter and Kazmir might be better. And that 14th pick might just be worth a little more than $20 mil to an organization with as depleted a farm system as the O's.

* Ugh, we could have signed both Fister AND Latos to one year deals for slightly more combined than we gave Yovani for one year, without losing the pick. Now they could probably both be significantly worse than Gallardo is, but there's an outside chance that one -- possibly Fister? -- could be better. Lots of O's fans will be eating crow if Fister has a bounce-back year in 2016 and Gallardo struggles.

*STILL, given the position we were in at the end of the FA class, given the inflated market for starters, I do have to say "well played" to DD for staring Gallardo down and getting a $10 mil cheaper deal than was initially rumored. Yovani blinked first, and we get a much better, low-risk deal than the one it would have taken to resign Chen. There were probably better deals to be made for SP this offseason, but at least something was done of significance. Gallardo will lessen the pressure on the other four guys. And, if one of them has a Norris-style meltdown this year, maybe the team won't feel as compelled to keep trotting them out there. I'm pretty convinced that Arrieta in 2013 and Norris last year were the biggest impediments to the O's playoff hopes in those respective seasons. Hopefully, with more depth that Gallardo brings, maybe the team will be more inclined to bench a struggling starter before they completely melt down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're getting a guy with a 111 career ERA+ in his age 30-33 seasons for an AAV of 11.5 and a lost draft pick. A guy who's made at least 30 starts for seven seasons.

I don't think they could have signed both Latos and Fister as there was only one slot in the rotation. Even if they do well, they have to replace them in 2017.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Gallardo vs. Chen -- the #14 pick is a lot more of a sure thing than a pick around #30. However, in the end, I have to agree. I heard plenty of talk around Chen that his numbers are unsustainable... I don't necessarily agree, but it's a similar conversation to that of Gallardo. When we get to "hindsight is 20/20" time, if Chen gives Miami six good years, his is the better deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they could have signed both Latos and Fister as there was only one slot in the rotation. Even if they do well, they have to replace them in 2017.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok, then maybe they could have signed just Fister for the 2/22 he was asking for. That's half the adjusted value of Gallardo's contract with one fewer year of commitment (but still a 2 year deal so you get someone past year one). I'm not saying Fister is going to be as good as Yovani the next two years, but it's reasonable to think he might provide 2/3 the WAR (just as it's reasonable to think Gallardo is going to provide at least two-thirds the WAR as Chen). It's worth pondering, at the very least. Could be a wash in the end, but I'd rather have the pick if it's a wash, even adjusting for the pick's "value." Cause you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fister never would have passed the O's physical nor would Latos. Kazmir got 3/48 M with a one year opt out, from a NL contender, in a pitchers park. What is the opt out worth, the NL, worth, the contender worth, and the pitchers park worth? No way that comes to 3/60 M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fister never would have passed the O's physical nor would Latos. Kazmir got 3/48 M with a one year opt out, from a NL contender, in a pitchers park. What is the opt out worth, the NL, worth, the contender worth, and the pitchers park worth? No way that comes to 3/60 M.

All Kazmir has to do is hold his own and he should definitely opt out.

As much as I wanted/want Latos, he and his agent were concerned about the Orioles physical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poke a few assumptions.

$20 million for the pick is arbitrary. We don't know how the Orioles put a number on picks. Most valuations I have seen vary widely. I think $20 is actually high.

Can't assume the Orioles 'could' have signed Fister, Latos, or Kazmir. It takes two to tango.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poke a few assumptions.

$20 million for the pick is arbitrary. We don't know how the Orioles put a number on picks. Most valuations I have seen vary widely. I think $20 is actually high.

Can't assume the Orioles 'could' have signed Fister, Latos, or Kazmir. It takes two to tango.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Considering what the Orioles have received from the majority of their picks, I would have to think that $20 million value would be if we get lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering what the Orioles have received from the majority of their picks, I would have to think that $20 million value would be if we get lucky.

It's an average of what all picks at that point would be worth. And it is not definite. But it has nothing to do with what team it is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they could have signed both Latos and Fister as there was only one slot in the rotation. Even if they do well, they have to replace them in 2017.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why would you want the Orioles to take themselves out of the running for a starting pitcher to automatically award a rotation spot to Gonzo? I like Gonzo. He's been a good pitcher for us. However even in his good years, his ERA was over a run lower than his FIP because of an absurd rate. Last year, his strand rate regressed to the mean and the results were ugly. It would have been nice if the Orioles had signed a pitcher Latos or Fister along with Gallardo to really fortify the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you want the Orioles to take themselves out of the running for a starting pitcher to automatically award a rotation spot to Gonzo? I like Gonzo. He's been a good pitcher for us. However even in his good years, his ERA was over a run lower than his FIP because of an absurd rate. Last year, his strand rate regressed to the mean and the results were ugly. It would have been nice if the Orioles had signed a pitcher Latos or Fister along with Gallardo to really fortify the rotation.

The same Fister that lost a SP job last season?

No thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering what the Orioles have received from the majority of their picks, I would have to think that $20 million value would be if we get lucky.

It's a hard number to calculate. Lots of guaranteed costs like signing bonus, salary, coaching. Plus opportunity cost.

Lots of risk, injury, guy never makes it, etc.

Chance of actually making the majors is low, being a starter even lower. Then once they do make it you have a limited window before salary jumps or he leaves in free agency.

I can see how teams would rather acquire a veteran for 2-5 years over picking amateurs. Obviously, teams need to do both. But I can see how $20 million for a #14 pick is nothing to hang your hat on.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...