Jump to content

The Trumbo/Davis RF situation....


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

I doubt that it's anything close to a win or two over the course of a season.

A run or two. If you are lucky. Then again, Trumbo might be a run or two better. What if Davis tears his labrum again like he did before throwing from right. Bad News. Then he could not pitch again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
A run or two. If you are lucky. Then again, Trumbo might be a run or two better. What if Davis tears his labrum again like he did before throwing from right. Bad News. Then he could not pitch again.

All it takes is one bad play that the other may have made to cost us a game.

It should come down to who gives us the better chance to win out there, plain and simple.

Arguments aside, I'm sure we see both guys in the OF at some point this year. I just don't know what the share will be. But looks like Trumbo will be the first option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All it takes is one bad play that the other may have made to cost us a game.

It should come down to who gives us the better chance to win out there, plain and simple.

Arguments aside, I'm sure we see both guys in the OF at some point this year. I just don't know what the share will be. But looks like Trumbo will be the first option.

But the problem is that there is not conclusive evidence or enough of a spread between the two to say who is more likely to make said costly play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the problem is that there is not conclusive evidence or enough of a spread between the two to say who is more likely to make said costly play.

That's what Spring Training is for. Or at least that's what it should be for. The coaches can watch these two in practices and in games and decide pretty quickly who is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what Spring Training is for. Or at least that's what it should be for. The coaches can watch these two in practices and in games and decide pretty quickly who is better.

Is ST truly a good enough sample size for that? Particularly with vets. Also, when you sign a guy LT like we did with Chris, it's unlikely that you make him compete for spots in ST, particularly one he doesn't necessarily want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the problem is that there is not conclusive evidence or enough of a spread between the two to say who is more likely to make said costly play.

Nor will there be a big enough sample size to support this argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is ST truly a good enough sample size for that? Particularly with vets. Also, when you sign a guy LT like we did with Chris, it's unlikely that you make him compete for spots in ST, particularly one he doesn't necessarily want.

Chris won't play there this spring. Is that a big enough sample?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still bet Buck will use a platoon DH

I think that is the general consensus. You don't want Pedro in there against lefties. Trumbo to DH and Reimold/Rickard to right against lefties. They may have to cover right and left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that is the general consensus. You don't want Pedro in there against lefties. Trumbo to DH and Reimold/Rickard to right against lefties. They may have to cover right and left.

Not to mention the occasional day off from playing the field for guys like jones.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought one of the reasons Davis was an attractive free agent was his versatility? Now that he is signed he is a 1B only? Because of increased injury risk he can't move around the field, which is part of his value? Count me as one who thinks Buck will do what is best for the team and wins. If that means Davis in RF then that's where we will see him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...