Jump to content

Expensive $$$ Offseason-What would have done differently?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

Yes this is totally stupid. The guys a pro and he wants a future in MLB .

I'm sure he does, but I think DD had his mind set on going to Toronto and that it distracted him from the job he was supposed to do here which certainly affected our season. He wanted to go and almost did and that just leaves a bad taste in my mouth about him especially considering the poor offseason we had as a result. I thought it was unprofessional to do what Toronto did and even more for DD who should have shot it down immediately if he was so committed to the Orioles. I'm not implying he is doing anything on purpose, just that his heart may not be fully into it as it was before all that happened. Just the fact that it got as far as it did tells me he expected to be gone and he made no secret that he was interested in leaving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

1. Don't sign Davis

2. Don't sign O'day

3. Don't tender Matusz

4. Don't sign Riemold

5. Stop the annual donation to the KBO bust of the year (don't sign Kim)

4. I'm okay with Trumbo if he was starting 1B

5. Sign Carter for 1/3.5

6. Sign Leake +Fister

7. Sign a COF'er who can catch (Denard Span, even Austin Jackson are better than we got)

And how can you take a guy like Triggs off the 40 man and still have Parades on it

8. Cut/trade Parades in December

The O's are now set up for at least 3 consecutive losing seasons, will we get back to 14, well we're on the right course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Don't sign Davis

2. Don't sign O'day

3. Don't tender Matusz

4. Don't sign Riemold

5. Stop the annual donation to the KBO bust of the year (don't sign Kim)

4. I'm okay with Trumbo if he was starting 1B

5. Sign Carter for 1/3.5

6. Sign Leake +Fister

7. Sign a COF'er who can catch (Denard Span, even Austin Jackson are better than we got)

And how can you take a guy like Triggs off the 40 man and still have Parades on it

8. Cut/trade Parades in December

The O's are now set up for at least 3 consecutive losing seasons, will we get back to 14, well we're on the right course

Congratulations on your 2500th post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure he does, but I think DD had his mind set on going to Toronto and that it distracted him from the job he was supposed to do here which certainly affected our season. He wanted to go and almost did and that just leaves a bad taste in my mouth about him especially considering the poor offseason we had as a result. I thought it was unprofessional to do what Toronto did and even more for DD who should have shot it down immediately if he was so committed to the Orioles. I'm not implying he is doing anything on purpose, just that his heart may not be fully into it as it was before all that happened. Just the fact that it got as far as it did tells me he expected to be gone and he made no secret that he was interested in leaving.

It paid real big money, a lot of prestige. Dan Duquette was never going to be a Oriole lifer. Just a well paid GM that knew how to do the job and had contacts. HE would have loved to make five times as much and be president of a very big company. I wish they had not tampered with the Orioles employee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on here belly-ache about Gallardo's declining K rate and call for Mike Leake who's k-rate is declining as well and is less than Gallardo's. And they want to guarantee him $50M more.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It doesn't matter who DD signed or traded for, we would have pages on OH from those not happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter who DD signed or traded for, we would have pages on OH from those not happy.

Agreed. Likewise, it doesn't matter how many moves there were out there that would have made the team exponentially better/cheaper/more dynamic/etc., there will be the same posters insisting none of it was possible because it didn't happen, and the front office did the very best anyone could reasonably be expected to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on here belly-ache about Gallardo's declining K rate and call for Mike Leake who's k-rate is declining as well and is less than Gallardo's. And they want to guarantee him $50M more.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I didn't hear much of that at all. Most of the chatter after Leake's deal was that he was overpaid. After Price and Zimmerman, there were not a lot of guys who would have been upgrades.

Myself, after the elite pitchers were gone, I would have been fine keeping the draft pick and going with internal options. Gallardo just seems like regression waiting to happen, and a waste of money and the pick.

I started to like the deal when it appeared we would be getting Fowler with the #2 pick, but then Fowler fell through. While Fowler is at least partially to blame, the front office certainly bungled that one as well by moving forward with Gallardo before anything with Fowler was in writing. Wait until you have signatures from both players and then put the team's signature on them at the same time and do not accept one without the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't hear much of that at all. Most of the chatter after Leake's deal was that he was overpaid. After Price and Zimmerman, there were not a lot of guys who would have been upgrades.

Myself, after the elite pitchers were gone, I would have been fine keeping the draft pick and going with internal options. Gallardo just seems like regression waiting to happen, and a waste of money and the pick.

I started to like the deal when it appeared we would be getting Fowler with the #2 pick, but then Fowler fell through. While Fowler is at least partially to blame, the front office certainly bungled that one as well by moving forward with Gallardo before anything with Fowler was in writing. Wait until you have signatures from both players and then put the team's signature on them at the same time and do not accept one without the other.

I've seen at least two calls for Leake in this thread.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It paid real big money, a lot of prestige. Dan Duquette was never going to be a Oriole lifer. Just a well paid GM that knew how to do the job and had contacts. HE would have loved to make five times as much and be president of a very big company. I wish they had not tampered with the Orioles employee.

Yeah, I understand the deal with the money and the prestige and all that and I know he wasn't going to be a lifer especially with Angelos's son blocking any possibility for promotion, but I do expect him to put the Orioles first while he's here and not be looking to jump ship at the first chance. The tampering did have an effect on our season last year and who knows if there's any tension in the FO considering PA was the one that essentially ruined it for DD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I understand the deal with the money and the prestige and all that and I know he wasn't going to be a lifer especially with Angelos's son blocking any possibility for promotion, but I do expect him to put the Orioles first while he's here and not be looking to jump ship at the first chance. The tampering did have an effect on our season last year and who knows if there's any tension in the FO considering PA was the one that essentially ruined it for DD.

Horse Hockey.

The tampering how nothing to do with the SP woes, the inability of De Aza and Parra to play well, when wearing an Oriole uniform, and the big collapse in August, after being with a couple of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horse Hockey.

The tampering how nothing to do with the SP woes, the inability of De Aza and Parra to play well, when wearing an Oriole uniform, and the big collapse in August, after being with a couple of games.

It did affect DD's focus when trying to sign players we needed. You don't think there was a conflict of interest going on with him having both feet out the door about to go off to a division rival's front office? It was a distraction to everyone involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It did affect DD's focus when trying to sign players we needed. You don't think there was a conflict of interest going on with him having both feet out the door about to go off to a division rival's front office? It was a distraction to everyone involved.

You don't know that.

That is pure speculation.

I think Dan was limited by his budget and his desire to retain as much as possible from a 96 win club. In a move by move basis I can't find too much to disagree with what Dan did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...