Jump to content

D.J. Stewart 2016


Frobby

Recommended Posts

This is revisionist history. While some, or even many, teams may have had him as a 2nd or 3rd rounder, the consensus formed by Baseball America, had him at #28 as late as May 7, last year. There were plenty who saw him as a late first rounder, where he was taken. Whether you agreed with the pick or not, let's not act as if it "made little sense".

I think the more decision makers who saw him late in the season the more his stock fell -- and that if BA said he was a "consensus" late first rounder then that was flat out wrong. The same it was not an indefensible pick so long as you were not leaning heavily on his stats as justification.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think the more decision makers who saw him late in the season the more his stock fell -- and that if BA said he was a "consensus" late first rounder then that was flat out wrong. The same it was not an indefensible pick so long as you were not leaning heavily on his stats as justification.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Stotle: hitting aside, do you think his arm can stick in LF? My friend who was a scout said maybe but wasn't super impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explanation for what? I would assume the Orioles did not have him as a second or third rounder.

And my question is why not? You answered another poster after me that BA was wrong in their assessment. So, I guess I'm wondering what the Orioles were looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And my question is why not? You answered another poster after me that BA was wrong in their assessment. So, I guess I'm wondering what the Orioles were looking at.

All I know is that I now believe that the O's should let him be his own unique little snowflake and go back to his old stance.

Who are they to dictate to a player who works for them how to go about his business?

They should be more understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is that I now believe that the O's should let him be his own unique little snowflake and go back to his old stance.

Who are they to dictate to a player who works for them how to go about his business?

They should be more understanding.

Seem to remember a pitcher with which they used the same philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And my question is why not? You answered another poster after me that BA was wrong in their assessment. So, I guess I'm wondering what the Orioles were looking at.

All I said was if BA stated there was a "consensus" that Stewart was a late-first rounder then that was wrong. I didn't say no one in their right mind could ever consider drafting Stewart in the late-first round.

I don't know what the Orioles' process was in selecting Stewart. Ask Tony-OH or weams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is that I now believe that the O's should let him be his own unique little snowflake and go back to his old stance.

Who are they to dictate to a player who works for them how to go about his business?

They should be more understanding.

That's rational. I'd maybe start with "don't spend seven figures on college players you want to completely remake," but that doesn't have the same smart-assy fun to it. So I get where you're coming from...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I said was if BA stated there was a "consensus" that Stewart was a late-first rounder then that was wrong. I didn't say no one in their right mind could ever consider drafting Stewart in the late-first round.

I don't know what the Orioles' process was in selecting Stewart. Ask Tony-OH or weams.

You say it wasn't a consensus. Is this based on discussions with scouts from MLB organizations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in Ocean City for a few days, so I decided to hop over and catch my first Shorebirds game. Freezing cold night, started to rain at the start but it didn't last long, and so I got to see some of Stewart. I'd only seen him one other time with Aberdeen last year after he was drafted, and while I never played the game and have little basis to judge anybody, I saw his batting stance and simply could not understand how anybody could make it successful. Tonight when I saw him he wasn't crouched AS low to the ground, but his stance still just looks odd too low to the ground. I don't see why he couldn't find a medium like a Rafael Palmeiro style stance, it certainly worked for him and was a thing of beauty to watch. He's still young, albeit not really for the SAL, but watching him tonight nothing about him stood out, and I really struggle to believe he'll make it to the big leagues at the moment, let alone make an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.313 BA, .820 OPS over the past 10 games. Overall, .230 BA, .692 OPS. Still not what you want to see from a first round college bat playing in low A, but progress in the right direction. Maybe he's making the adjustment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 10 games: 29AB, 13 walks, 8 SO, .379BA

2016: .236/.415/.319/.734

Looks like he has his batting eye back, with a good couple months they should promote the man to Frederick. Here's to hoping!

You'd like to see more power though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Since April 23. 7 for 28 including 2 doubles, 1 triple, and 1 homer.   5 walks.  3 strikeouts.  
    • I’d be very surprised too but it’s all about talent and where you draft.  At 22 it’s tough to get high ceiling talent.  I’d guess Brecht is a reliever at the next level but he’s got dominant reliever upside.  His stuff, reportedly, is as good as any pitcher in the draft.  95 strikeouts in 55 innings as a starter.  
    • He's already a HOF.  It's just that his injuries have killed his chances of being an Inner Circle HOF.
    • With three more hits today, Etzel is at .360/.992. He has 171 MiLB at bats, so a third of a season. Which projects to a full season with:  513 AB 111 R 39 2B 12 3B 12 HR 114 RBI 93 BB 123 SO 90 SB 21 CS .339 AVG .445 OBP .532 SLG Not too shabby!    
    • I would love for someone to explain or justify to me how in the world Mullins catch on 4/15 is listed at 65% catch probability. There are a couple of guys in the league that make that catch but it’s a very short list. Maybe I just don’t understand the stat.
    • Not sure a pitcher technically can get “squeezed” by the automated strike zone but Povich had a number of borderline pitches tonight that could go the other way.  Handley was visibility perturbed by a few of the calls on walks and Povich doubled over in disbelief on a couple of walk calls. He reminds me a little of Tom Glavine how he throws, his wind up, how he hides the ball and how it explodes out his hand….sort of effortless. I heard the announcer for the Sound say Povich’s curveball hasn’t had a hit against it all year long and every other pitch is around .100 batting avg against.  In person, his fastball has a lot more giddy up than the radar shows.  98 pitches tonight and looks like he has a rubber arm.  
    • a game you'd hope Mullins, Mountcastle or Santander would step up and were let down. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...