Jump to content

Attendance


Todd-O

Recommended Posts

I personally feel very safe around the stadium, but you can't tell other people how to feel. I'm surprised to hear that last year's riots have had any lasting effect on people's perceptions of their safety, but apparently some people do feel that way, so I am sure that has some impact on attendance.

My engilsh teacher and her family (all nats fans) wanted to go to OPACY for an O's Nats fame and now don't because they don't know the area and don't want their 10 and 8 year old kids seeing anything awful. I played defense and pointed out the scary areas of DC and how they were arguably worse than Baltimore, but that was her fear. It's the city's reputation at this point, right, wrong or indifferent, that is keeping potential ticket buyers like her away. I personally am not scared, and never was. Just deeply upset at everyone involved, and what happened. I love that city and hope it rises from the ashes once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Don't be a fear monger.

Like any large city, Toronto, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angelos, there is going to be crime.

I have no fear of traveling through Baltimore, but, you use your head and don't be stupid, either.

Agreed. The whole idea that Baltimore is some city on the precipice of disaster is baffling. All major cities have bad areas, all major cities have problems. NYC has burned before, too, on numerous occasions. They got over it.

If you're self-aware, you can get into and out of Baltimore with little to no issue. There are countless people that live and work there and never have a bad experience. It's not the hellhole people like to melodramatically pretend it is. My cousin has lived in the city his entire adult life and never so much as gotten looked at funny.

What's driving down attendance is simple: They hiked up ticket prices. I live about an hour out, and normally attend 5-6 home games a year. This year it's been 1, and will probably stay 1. Because of my distance, I usually have to focus on weekend games. And they've jacked up the prices for them, regardless of opponent. It's baffling that I can't get a cheap seat to see them play the freaking Rays on a Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. The whole idea that Baltimore is some city on the precipice of disaster is baffling. All major cities have bad areas, all major cities have problems. NYC has burned before, too, on numerous occasions. They got over it.

If you're self-aware, you can get into and out of Baltimore with little to no issue. There are countless people that live and work there and never have a bad experience. It's not the hellhole people like to melodramatically pretend it is. My cousin has lived in the city his entire adult life and never so much as gotten looked at funny.

What's driving down attendance is simple: They hiked up ticket prices. I live about an hour out, and normally attend 5-6 home games a year. This year it's been 1, and will probably stay 1. Because of my distance, I usually have to focus on weekend games. And they've jacked up the prices for them, regardless of opponent. It's baffling that I can't get a cheap seat to see them play the freaking Rays on a Sunday.

You can ignore facts all you want. I have traveled to a lot of cities and Cities like Columbus, San Antonio, San Francisco, Boston etc have a lot less violent crime than Baltimore. And don't even start comparing to Canadian and European cities. Baltimore has a very high crime rate no matter what your straw man argument about your cousin's experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can ignore facts all you want. I have traveled to a lot of cities and Cities like Columbus, San Antonio, San Francisco, Boston etc have a lot less violent crime than Baltimore. And don't even start comparing to Canadian and European cities. Baltimore has a very high crime rate no matter what your straw man argument about your cousin's experiences.

You can pick and chose your crime stats, but St. Louis has a higher homicide rate than Baltimore.

Los Angelos is more deadly than Baltimore, but the population of 10 Million drives the homicide rate lower than Baltimore.

If you dont think Canadian and European cities, dont have crimes, you are sadly mistaken. Toronto's murder rate is up over 200% in the past year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baltimore is definitely more dangerous than Toronto and Los Angelos. I am not being a fear monger but there is facts and there are just nonsense. Baltimore is dangerous. It has the 18th highest murder rate of any city in the world:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_murder_rate

You are talking about two different realities. Yes to be sure, Baltimore in general is a dangerous city. But before, during and after O's games it is very safe unless you go out away from the park too much. The police presence is heavy and you could argue heavier than in other cities because of the recent events. This may actually make it safer during games. Believe me the city wants to protect people at games for economic reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in the city and it seemed to be making progress with crime and image and then the unrest. People seem less friendly and crime has gone up even in so called safe areas. People also seem more tense. A few of my friends have moved out and more are looking into it. Port Covington might help but people don't want to give breaks to rich people will the rest of the city is in distress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, and I am sure that a lot of people share this attitude, but the convenience, experience, and cost of watching at home greatly outweigh going to the stadium. I live quite a drive away, I don't have to worry about parking. I have a family of 4 - that's expensive for a night of baseball. And, increasingly, at sporting events, I have to worry about my young children around some of the behavior. It's either college kids drunk a cursing, some clown in my seats and being a jerk when asked to leave, etc. I'll take the home experience 158 nights a year and plan a few "get night nights" at the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can pick and chose your crime stats, but St. Louis has a higher homicide rate than Baltimore.

Los Angelos is more deadly than Baltimore, but the population of 10 Million drives the homicide rate lower than Baltimore.

If you dont think Canadian and European cities, dont have crimes, you are sadly mistaken. Toronto's murder rate is up over 200% in the past year.

Of course the more people you have you need more murders to have the same crime rate. I never said St Louis wasn't as or more dangerous than Baltimore. If the murder rate is lower you have less chance of being murdered. I don't know how you can't grasp that. Toronto is much safer than Baltimore. No matter if the crime rate has gone up 200 percent or not.

I Haven't picked and choosed anything. Murder Rate and Violent Crime Rates are not picking and choosing. THese are stats the FBI uses. If you want to compare cities of different population sizes that is what you would use. Rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, and I am sure that a lot of people share this attitude, but the convenience, experience, and cost of watching at home greatly outweigh going to the stadium. I live quite a drive away, I don't have to worry about parking. I have a family of 4 - that's expensive for a night of baseball. And, increasingly, at sporting events, I have to worry about my young children around some of the behavior. It's either college kids drunk a cursing, some clown in my seats and being a jerk when asked to leave, etc. I'll take the home experience 158 nights a year and plan a few "get night nights" at the park.

I have had the problem of people in my seats being annoying when asked to leave as well. One guy left his cell phone behind after being a jerk. I did not run after to give him his phone back. Gave it to to the usher an inning later. Karma in my book.

I find club level seats the best when bringing small children to the game. They don't allow people to buy the cheapest tickets in the house and then sneak up to club level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are talking about two different realities. Yes to be sure, Baltimore in general is a dangerous city. But before, during and after O's games it is very safe unless you go out away from the park too much. The police presence is heavy and you could argue heavier than in other cities because of the recent events. This may actually make it safer during games. Believe me the city wants to protect people at games for economic reasons.

I don't have a problem going to the games because of safety but I think it isn't fair to tell people Baltimore is safe. You get a few blocks from the stadium and you are on a side street you could find your self in trouble. Parking in the stadium lots is the best bet. Or near Pratt street. It is true they have a big police presence and odds are nothing will happen to you in those areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had the problem of people in my seats being annoying when asked to leave as well. One guy left his cell phone behind after being a jerk. I did not run after to give him his phone back. Gave it to to the usher an inning later. Karma in my book.

I find club level seats the best when bringing small children to the game. They don't allow people to buy the cheapest tickets in the house and then sneak up to club level.

I definitely agree with the club level, but that just adds to the cost. Maybe I am just getting old and turning into a hermit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walkup sales do not drive attendance. Average walkup is between 3000 and 5000, depending on the weather, day of the week, who's pitching, etc. What really drives your attendance is season ticket sales and the Orioles severely bungled season ticket renewals this offseason. Sure the price hikes hurt but I think the real issue was the extremely late/delayed mailing of season ticket renewal invoices.

If you recall, we basically held off on season ticket renewals until after Davis was resigned; then letters were mailed out sometime in mid February, only about 6 weeks before opening day. In years past, season ticket renewals were coming out in December, IIRC. (I'm including a link from the Sun in 2015, where renewals were sent out in January that year and that it was nearly 2 months late) That additional time afforded people the opportunity to make a decision, work out payments. etc. Instead, you not only sharply increase prices but you also give fans virtually no time to make their decision.

I can speak to this personally; my folks have been season ticket holders for 10 years.By the time they got their renewal letter, they decided against it because they didn't have enough time to pay off their plan. Had they gotten their renewal in December, they would've renewed.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/bal-orioles-will-not-raise-ticket-prices-for-2015-20150127-story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the more people you have you need more murders to have the same crime rate. I never said St Louis wasn't as or more dangerous than Baltimore. If the murder rate is lower you have less chance of being murdered. I don't know how you can't grasp that. Toronto is much safer than Baltimore. No matter if the crime rate has gone up 200 percent or not.

I Haven't picked and choosed anything. Murder Rate and Violent Crime Rates are not picking and choosing. THese are stats the FBI uses. If you want to compare cities of different population sizes that is what you would use. Rates.

Fine. Stats. Baltimore ranks behind four other "baseball cities" in violent crime rates. Detroit, Oakland, St. Louis, Milwaukee. Ranks more or less on par with Cleveland and Kansas City. It has the same problems of any major city. And none of that is new. Baltimore wasn't some cheery place until 2015.

It's not what's keeping people away. Last year's poor play and recently increased ticket prices drove down this year's numbers. It's simply not economically easy to go to a game anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...