Jump to content

Attendance problem not just an Oriole problem?


Dark Helmet

Recommended Posts

  • 3 years later...
Quote

The World Series opener between the Washington Nationals and Houston Astros narrowly averted setting a record low.

Washington's 5-4 victory Tuesday night averaged 12,194,000 television viewers, according to national numbers from Nielsen. That edges the 12,191,000 who tuned in for San Francisco's 7-1 win over Kansas City in the 2014 opener.

The network that used to employ Charlie Steiner

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, O's are Legends said:

Ratings for everything everywhere are far lower than in decades past because of entertainment choices.  Everyone has 300 channels, and nobody watches them because they also have the internet and Xbox and all their kids have activities six days a week.  Kids don't watch sports, and our increasingly older population only watches Fox News and the Weather Channel (source: Drungo's dad) and is asleep by 8:30 anyway.  On the east coast I don't think the Series starts until about 9:00; even if the O's were playing it would be a nightmare to watch and go to work for a couple weeks on four hours sleep.

And unfortunately, nationwide baseball ratings are highly dependent on whether the Yanks, Sox, or Dodgers are playing.  We have a front-running culture, to a large extent.  Part of the reason baseball won't take bigger steps to solve revenue disparities.

Yes, there's some amount of exaggeration in the post, but also a fair amount of truth.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure the series starts at closer to 8:00.

But yeah the trick is using the right data.  You can mold it however you want depending on what your agenda is.

Ratings are down for this year, sure, because Yankees/Sox/Dodgers aren't in it.  

But I understand it still won the timeslot for FOX,  so that's still significant out of whatever subset of people actually watch TV.   Wonder if those numbers include people like me who have streaming TV thru Hulu/Sling/YouTube / whatever.

I think Drungo is saying the answer to baseball's ratings woes is to create an authoritarian state that bans alternative means of media distribution.   And ban all but 20-30 TV channels.  Too much freedom is dangerous.................   ;)

If I am misinterpreting though sir please feel free to correct me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Pretty sure the series starts at closer to 8:00.

But yeah the trick is using the right data.  You can mold it however you want depending on what your agenda is.

Ratings are down for this year, sure, because Yankees/Sox/Dodgers aren't in it.  

But I understand it still won the timeslot for FOX,  so that's still significant out of whatever subset of people actually watch TV.   Wonder if those numbers include people like me who have streaming TV thru Hulu/Sling/YouTube / whatever.

I think Drungo is saying the answer to baseball's ratings woes is to create an authoritarian state that bans alternative means of media distribution.   And ban all but 20-30 TV channels.  Too much freedom is dangerous.................   ;)

If I am misinterpreting though sir please feel free to correct me.

No, that's exactly right.  Although under our new regime some people will be very devoted to watching our dear leaders (me, you, weams, obviously) ride white stallions around Montana on the state media channel, which could lower the ratings for the World Series.  Perhaps some kind of picture-in-picture so we can watch both?  Or just require everyone to have two TVs on at all times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the attendance "problem" is on purpose.  In the past 27 years almost every team has replaced an older stadium with a newer one that has less capacity.  Sometimes far less.

One example, in 2010 the Twins moved into Target Field.  In 2009 they had 14 games at the Metrodome with an attendance higher than the listed capacity of Target Field.  They had three pennant race games in early October that had 49-51k.  Those all would have been 38,000 and change in the new park.  I'd guess this effect is on the order of 50,000 to 100,000 fans per team per season.  A few percent.

And with all the new fields there's much less of a Camden Yards effect.  The Twins got a bump in 2010 but three years later they were back to the numbers they had at the Metrodome.  But presumably with greater revenues from higher costs of attending games and greater opportunity to extract money for things like suites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

.

And unfortunately, nationwide baseball ratings are highly dependent on whether the Yanks, Sox, or Dodgers are playing.  We have a front-running culture, to a large extent.  Part of the reason baseball won't take bigger steps to solve revenue disparities.

 

I don't think Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers having higher viewership is to do with front-runners.  New York and LA market size dwarfs Washington and Houston.  And a lot of DC population is immigrants and people from other parts of the country. 

Baseball is more of a local sport.  I don't watch the World Series as the Orioles aren't in it.  I watch the Super Bowl no matter what the teams are.  I think that is the norm.   I have zero interest in watching the Nationals and the Astros play.    Really it would take someone paying me hundreds of dollars to get me to watch them play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

I don't think Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers having higher viewership is to do with front-runners.  New York and LA market size dwarfs Washington and Houston.  And a lot of DC population is immigrants and people from other parts of the country. 

Baseball is more of a local sport.  I don't watch the World Series as the Orioles aren't in it.  I watch the Super Bowl no matter what the teams are.  I think that is the norm.   I have zero interest in watching the Nationals and the Astros play.    Really it would take someone paying me hundreds of dollars to get me to watch them play. 

New York and LA are big, but combined they're about 10% of the US media market.  The bigger effect, to me, is that in most areas the 2nd favorite team is the Yankees.froa2mshyyikwywszwfs.jpg  In some places like the Carolinas, New Mexico, Montana, and Louisiana the Yanks are the #1 team.  There are like 14 Orioles fans in Santa Fe.  There are probably 10,000 Yankee fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

New York and LA are big, but combined they're about 10% of the US media market.  The bigger effect, to me, is that in most areas the 2nd favorite team is the Yankees.froa2mshyyikwywszwfs.jpg  In some places like the Carolinas, New Mexico, Montana, and Louisiana the Yanks are the #1 team.  There are like 14 Orioles fans in Santa Fe.  There are probably 10,000 Yankee fans.

Unlikely, population was only 83,776 in 2017.  Highly doubt one in eight is a Yankee fan.  Most probably aren't baseball fans at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

New York and LA are big, but combined they're about 10% of the US media market.  The bigger effect, to me, is that in most areas the 2nd favorite team is the Yankees.froa2mshyyikwywszwfs.jpg  In some places like the Carolinas, New Mexico, Montana, and Louisiana the Yanks are the #1 team.  There are like 14 Orioles fans in Santa Fe.  There are probably 10,000 Yankee fans.

Having some family in the Carolinas, my unofficial opinion is, the two states are pretty much Braves for MLB, but college Football and Basketball is a religion to them. There is a sprinkling of Oriole Fans in some parts of NC, near Norfolk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...