Jump to content

Orioles Officially sign Catcher Welington Castillo


Machado13

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Yeah - Wel wanted more than we offered.  I still think they will overpay for Wiety and keep core intact.  Whatevs!

Well the good news is he was a two win player last year despite having one of his worst years offensively.  He really is at or near the top of a weak FA catcher crop.

There is a price where I would be happy to have him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 475
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 hours ago, El Gordo said:

I don't see the urgency, we still have Avilla, Soto, Hundley, Ianetta, Suzuki,  Salty, and Wieters as options.

True.  Even though we tried with Castillo, we're still going to have to wait until MW signs.  Just what I'm reading into this is that Castillo wants 3/21 and MW wants 4/48.  We're probably close with both on the yearly salary but they both probably want one more year than what we're offering.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 25 Nuggets said:

I really hope you're right.  I'd like for the team to only have to worry about RF past the holidays.

Lol. I'd like to have a vacation bungalow in Bora Bora, and I've got more of a chance of that happening than Duquette changing the way he operates in the off season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

True.  Even though we tried with Castillo, we're still going to have to wait until MW signs.  Just what I'm reading into this is that Castillo wants 3/21 and MW wants 4/48.  We're probably close with both on the yearly salary but they both probably want one more year than what we're offering.  

With Sisco coming up by 2018 I would think we would want to limit any contract we offer this year to 2 years, tops. Bringing back Wieters for three years or more is not something I would be in favor of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, what a bunch of dunces.  I've intentionally not paid close attention this offseason because....well, the offseason sucks pretty much every year.  Everyone starts theirs shortly after the World Series ends but the Orioles fart around until it's time to show up to Spring Training to do anything worthwhile.  Worthwhile being used loosely.

My prediction is that Wieters goes somewhere, Castillo signs somewhere else right after and we're left out in the cold.  

Meanwhile we're ALL OVER the Rule 5 guys.  What game changers they'll be for us.  The Winter Meetings for the Orioles are literally figuring out what dumb Rule 5 guy we'll have to have all year.  

Just saw that we re-signed Logan Ondrusek.  Awesome.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ugh, what a bunch of dunces.  I've intentionally not paid close attention this offseason because....well, the offseason sucks pretty much every year.  Everyone starts theirs shortly after the World Series ends but the Orioles fart around until it's time to show up to Spring Training to do anything worthwhile.  Worthwhile being used loosely.

My prediction is that Wieters goes somewhere, Castillo signs somewhere else right after and we're left out in the cold.  

Meanwhile we're ALL OVER the Rule 5 guys.  What game changers they'll be for us.  The Winter Meetings for the Orioles are literally figuring out what dumb Rule 5 guy we'll have to have all year.  

Just saw that we re-signed Logan Ondrusek.  Awesome.  

Sadly your most likely DEAD ON...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ugh, what a bunch of dunces.  I've intentionally not paid close attention this offseason because....well, the offseason sucks pretty much every year.  Everyone starts theirs shortly after the World Series ends but the Orioles fart around until it's time to show up to Spring Training to do anything worthwhile.  Worthwhile being used loosely.

My prediction is that Wieters goes somewhere, Castillo signs somewhere else right after and we're left out in the cold.  

Meanwhile we're ALL OVER the Rule 5 guys.  What game changers they'll be for us.  The Winter Meetings for the Orioles are literally figuring out what dumb Rule 5 guy we'll have to have all year.  

Just saw that we re-signed Logan Ondrusek.  Awesome.  

Seems to me Duquette's offseason tactics have worked out pretty well over the last five years.   I can criticize individual moves, but the end results have been pretty good.   And this year's FA class is mostly uninspiring and not well-matched to our needs, with a few exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Seems to me Duquette's offseason tactics have worked out pretty well over the last five years.   I can criticize individual moves, but the end results have been pretty good.   And this year's FA class is mostly uninspiring and not well-matched to our needs, with a few exceptions.

But it's a lot easier to just say Duquette is a dunce and destroying interest in baseball in Baltimore. You know, like making the playoffs 60% of the time after 14 years of sub .500 baseball. Like you, I have questioned plenty of his moves and he's not perfect by any sense of the word, but this offseason has been similar to just about every offseason since he got here. Remember when he acquired Trumbo and some people were like, "What are you doing paying that loser $9 million?" 

Honestly, in my estimation Duquette overvalues his own major league players and I'd like to see him be more aggressive in creating a lineup less one dimensional, but if anyone thought this offseason was going to be a game changer I'm not sure why? The team needs OBP, better outfield defense and a catcher, who at the very least will be able to platoon/split time with Joseph. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Seems to me Duquette's offseason tactics have worked out pretty well over the last five years.   I can criticize individual moves, but the end results have been pretty good.   And this year's FA class is mostly uninspiring and not well-matched to our needs, with a few exceptions.

I believe that "luck" has played a huge roll in Duquette's offseasons working out and luck runs out eventually.  I agree that the FA class this offseason has been pretty uninspiring but that doesn't mean the team couldn't have been improved via trades.  I say this every year but to me, you have to a plan and stick to it and I don't feel that Duquette has a plan (again...just my opinion).  I believe his "wait and see" approach every year is dangerous because eventually it won't work out.  I also agree with Moose's take on the O's off-season 100%.  It's one thing to not want to spend $20M on a single player but if you are creative, you can absolutely improve the team without having to do that and it doesn't seem like we are creative.  Seems as though the Winter Meetings every year (at least for the O's), is just for the Rule 5 Draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, millertime said:

I believe that "luck" has played a huge roll in Duquette's offseasons working out and luck runs out eventually.  I agree that the FA class this offseason has been pretty uninspiring but that doesn't mean the team couldn't have been improved via trades.  I say this every year but to me, you have to a plan and stick to it and I don't feel that Duquette has a plan (again...just my opinion).  I believe his "wait and see" approach every year is dangerous because eventually it won't work out.  I also agree with Moose's take on the O's off-season 100%.  It's one thing to not want to spend $20M on a single player but if you are creative, you can absolutely improve the team without having to do that and it doesn't seem like we are creative.  Seems as though the Winter Meetings every year (at least for the O's), is just for the Rule 5 Draft.

Care to give us some examples of your creativity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...