Jump to content

Adam Jones and Defense


weams

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, pastorfan said:

No, I don't think the guys he mentioned will care one bit that he pointed out their weaknesses. I'm sure if one of them talked about the need for more "plate discipline," and used Jones as an example, he would not mind :)

That's because another player wouldn't hold Adam's plate discipline against him. Wouldn't use him as an example. Sure he chases a lot of sliders but being aggressive is what has made him the hitter he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, scOtt said:

That's because another player wouldn't hold Adam's plate discipline against him. Wouldn't use him as an example. Sure he chases a lot of sliders but being aggressive is what has made him the hitter he is.

Plus in any discussion about plate discipline, only Kim would be talking and that would be in Korean so it wouldn't bug Jones much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, scOtt said:

That's because another player wouldn't hold Adam's plate discipline against him. Wouldn't use him as an example. Sure he chases a lot of sliders but being aggressive is what has made him the hitter he is.

Not sure I understand any of the logic here. You can be aggressive and still have plate discipline. I hardly think every hitter with plate discipline is "passive."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pastorfan said:

Not sure I understand any of the logic here. You can be aggressive and still have plate discipline. I hardly think every hitter with plate discipline is "passive."

Al lot are. Or at least, are accused of being. For instance, Joey Votto. Now, big power and steroids gets you walked a lot.  Which many people view as plate discipline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

My issue is that Adam needs to recognize that he didn't have a good year defensively himself.   Hopefully it was injury related and he'll be better this year.   That's the first thing he should worry about.     Then he can worry about his teammates.   

For once your off-base here.  Worrying is not going to erase his aging process or the gradual decline of his skills -- both chasing fly-balls and hitting sliders.  His quotes suggest to me that he's open to listening to re-positioning suggestions and that he understands that the Oriole approach of putting guys whose only talent is hitting into the outfield isn't going to produce fielding highlight film. He's sounding reasonable and accommodating to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

Al lot are. Or at least, are accused of being. For instance, Joey Votto. Now, big power and steroids gets you walked a lot.  Which many people view as plate discipline. 

Chris Davis was a "poster" child for passive last year to my memory. I think he took strike three right over the plate quite a few times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, pastorfan said:

Not sure I understand any of the logic here. You can be aggressive and still have plate discipline. I hardly think every hitter with plate discipline is "passive."

I don't think they're passive either. It's just two different types of hitters. Kim is willing to see pitches, work the count. Adam looks for a pitch to put in play. Both approaches work. There's no reason for either type to try to become the other type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2017 at 8:33 AM, webbrick2010 said:

I loved what he said... I've been saying it for two years

We need to get younger faster and more athletic... I posted this at least two years ago

I don't think AJ is happy with DD offseason... he knows a beer league softball lineup is not going to cut it.

We are about to go into the season without a single plus defender in the OF..... again

Yep - and that includes Adam. If I were Trumbo or Kim/Rickard, I would find these remarks not only insulting, but somewhat hypocritical. This isn't smart and it doesn't help those around you - morale-wise or in any possible way. Is Trumbo supposed to run faster now?  

You can't just pop off and give your opinion and say "I'm an outspoken guy... and I'm not talking down about Trumbo and Kim. And I'm not the boss, but..." and then go onto talk like the boss and run down Trumbo and Kim. Whatever.

I think we all agree that a better defensive outfield would be preferable. He's stating the obvious. And that, for me, would include moving Adam to left as quickly as possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2017 at 3:39 PM, scOtt said:

That's because another player wouldn't hold Adam's plate discipline against him. Wouldn't use him as an example. Sure he chases a lot of sliders but being aggressive is what has made him the hitter he is.

The hitter "he is" has had a LOT of really sad at-bats in very important situations over the years. (I'm sounding like I don't like Adam - I do! I just don't like about half of what he says in the media.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bradysburns said:

The hitter "he is" has had a LOT of really sad at-bats in very important situations over the years. (I'm sounding like I don't like Adam - I do! I just don't like about half of what he says in the media.)

Jones is an all-time Oriole great.  Our best acquisition since Frank. This town has loved him since he joined the team. However, he is starting to burn some bridges with his public remarks.  These things, he's saying can't sit well, with a lot of his team mates, although, silently, those other than Trumbo, Kim, Smith and Rickard, probably agree with him.  Those four guys probably now look at him as a Judas.  I do feel, that Captain Buck, will smooth things out this Spring.  He's just the man for the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ELMERO said:

Jones is an all-time Oriole great.  Our best acquisition since Frank. This town has loved him since he joined the team. However, he is starting to burn some bridges with his public remarks.  These things, he's saying can't sit well, with a lot of his team mates, although, silently, those other than Trumbo, Kim, Smith and Rickard, probably agree with him.  Those four guys probably now look at him as a Judas.  I do feel, that Captain Buck, will smooth things out this Spring.  He's just the man for the job.

I really hope Mark Trumbo is not delusional enough to believe he's a good defender in the outfield. He's probably well aware he isn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Babypowder said:

I really hope Mark Trumbo is not delusional enough to believe he's a good defender in the outfield. He's probably well aware he isn't. 

He mentioned his defense when he signed the extension.  I think he regards himself as adequate.  I might be able to dig it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...