Jump to content

The Clock


weams

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I have no problem with guys running hard.

Jones had a good quote about how it's not possible to run hard all the time through a 162 game season and not breaking down. It's one of those things that fans want to see but it's just not realistic. Stay healthy and pick your spots. Save the running hard for the guys at the bottom of the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Jones had a good quote about how it's not possible to run hard all the time through a 162 game season and not breaking down. It's one of those things that fans want to see but it's just not realistic. Stay healthy and pick your spots. Save the running hard for the guys at the bottom of the roster. 

I am of the belief that most of Jones' health issues are the result of him fouling non-strikes off his lower body.

I don't think running hard 300 more times a season is likely to wear a body out to a substantive degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Jones had a good quote about how it's not possible to run hard all the time through a 162 game season and not breaking down. It's one of those things that fans want to see but it's just not realistic. Stay healthy and pick your spots. Save the running hard for the guys at the bottom of the roster. 

When Jones leads us to a championship with some clutch hits in the postseason than I will consider his opinions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Jones had a good quote about how it's not possible to run hard all the time through a 162 game season and not breaking down. It's one of those things that fans want to see but it's just not realistic. Stay healthy and pick your spots. Save the running hard for the guys at the bottom of the roster. 

I'd love to sprint 90 feet 4 times a night.  Personally, I think Jones is full of crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wonder if this is the only franchise that gives this much of a crap about TTTP.

Couldn't they pick something else?  I don't know, like plate discipline, on base percentage, better routes to flyballs in the outfield....?

I agree with you on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wonder if this is the only franchise that gives this much of a crap about TTTP.

Couldn't they pick something else?  I don't know, like plate discipline, on base percentage, better routes to flyballs in the outfield....?

A huge board displaying everyone's on base percentage would be hilarious. Especially with the O's.

I used to post my slow-pitch softball team's stats on the wall of the dugout every week, largely as a shame motivator. It actually does work... Until someone gets mad and rips the paper down because their batting average is so low. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...