Jump to content

Issues with Brady?


notfast

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I could spell back before spell check.  Now if it looks close and isn't underlined in red I hit Submit Reply.

Spell check is proof of Satan's existence.  Beware the slippery slope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

2010 was his rookie season. Why did the team give him flak for it? Stadium in fort lauderdale is older than dirt and never been renovated. 

Not for a young man to discuss on social media. While under contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

It wasn't up more than a few days.

I guess it's possible parts of it were quoted in a thread here.

He took the team to task for the conditions during ST before they moved to Sarasota.

I found the blog, and posted a link here.    I'm not sure Arrieta really meant it for the general public, as opposed to people he knew.    When it kind of blew up, I worried that maybe my posting it here was what had gotten it more widely read.    I don't remember too much about it now, except he trashed the Ft. Lauderdale facilities, especially the weight room, which I think was out in a tent somewhere.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I found the blog, and posted a link here.    I'm not sure Arrieta really meant it for the general public, as opposed to people he knew.    When it kind of blew up, I worried that maybe my posting it here was what had gotten it more widely read.    I don't remember too much about it now, except he trashed the Ft. Lauderdale facilities, especially the weight room, which I think was out in a tent somewhere.    

The enlarged weight tent was in the parking lot beside where the players parked their cars. The club house was way too small there and the FAA would never permit expansion.  They did have generators and air conditioning, but they were big tents. Like the type that the Cadillac Dealer meeting was held in at Epcot, the one time that I attended in July. In the parking lot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weams said:

The enlarged weight tent was in the parking lot beside where the players parked their cars. The club house was way too small there and the FAA would never permit expansion.  They did have generators and air conditioning, but they were big tents. Like the type that the Cadillac Dealer meeting was held in at Epcot, the one time that I attended in July. In the parking lot.  

Or like they have in the field at Ft Bliss.

The condition of the field at the minor league facility was an issue as well, but I don't recall if Jake mentioned it.  I know at least one team refused to play on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Or like they have in the field at Ft Bliss.

The condition of the field at the minor league facility was an issue as well, but I don't recall if Jake mentioned it.  I know at least one team refused to play on it.

It was not a good field. It was similar to some of the minor league fields that Buck has complained about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Good people have disagreements sometimes.  Everyone in the article is perceived as a good guy.  Why do some have to turn it into the good guy verses the bad guys?

It's the nature of the game: one team wins, one loses. Off the field, events occur that we then contextualize into making one team more or less likely to win on the field. Net result, if an event increases likelihood of success, then it is "good" and any detractors are classified as "bad."

 

I definitely agree with you; but I can also understand why people turn it into an us vs them, good/bad judgment. There isn't nearly enough evidence to take a hard line on this situation. We just need to continue collecting data before we can make a valid determination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Frobby said:

I found the blog, and posted a link here.    I'm not sure Arrieta really meant it for the general public, as opposed to people he knew.    When it kind of blew up, I worried that maybe my posting it here was what had gotten it more widely read.    I don't remember too much about it now, except he trashed the Ft. Lauderdale facilities, especially the weight room, which I think was out in a tent somewhere.    

This is one of the articles from the Sun. Not that bad of a quote but I think there is another  Sun article that he says more things. 

 

Jake Arrieta, one of the organization's top pitching prospects, echoed those sentiments about the minor league facility.

"We're all very blessed to be in the situations that we're in, but it also comes with the territory that you expect to have nice facilities to work out in," he said. "Not that we're tired of Twin Lakes, but I think we deserve something better."

 

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2009-04-03/sports/0904020129_1_fort-lauderdale-stadium-orioles-major-spring

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also found this online.

 

Leaving Baltimore may have been more important than Arrieta’s mechanical tweaks. Arrieta became a top-shelf prospect, but never found himself, owing in part to internal tension. In his first big league spring training, in 2009, Arrieta kept a personal blog. He derided the Orioles’ spring training facilities, mocked the pitching mechanics of teammate Brad Bergesen and questioned the physical condition of established Orioles. One veteran noticed the blog, printed out copies and placed them on the chairs of every veteran in the clubhouse.

Arrieta became a target of scorn. Older players mocked him for strutting shirtless in the clubhouse. Club officials tried to tamp down his confidence. Even as those older players he ruffled moved on, Arrieta never overcame his first impression within the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...