Jump to content

Dan Duquette: Orioles Fans Hate Jose Bautista, Prefer "Working Class" Players


Phantom

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, PaulFolk said:

I agree. It's just a bad analogy, even if it has no race-based undertones.

A better analogy would be that Trumbo is boring, while Bautista is demonstrative. Trumbo seems to have no discernible personality either on or off the field, while Bautista is constantly trying to pick fights, show up other teams, etc.

I prefer Trumbo's boringness to Bautista's tiresome antics, and I'm sure the Orioles do, too. So why didn't Duquette just say it that way? Why bring up nonsense about "grit" and "working class"?

Old school baseball guys say dumb, meaningless stuff like this all the time. Such as "I like the way the ball comes out of his hand." I would categorize "grit" and "scrappiness" and other meaningless words and phrases the same way. I don't think you can apply anything truly meaningful to any of it, good or bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChinMusic said:

Old school baseball guys say dumb, meaningless stuff like this all the time. Such as "I like the way the ball comes out of his hand." I would categorize "grit" and "scrappiness" and other meaningless words and phrases the same way. I don't think you can apply anything truly meaningful to any of it, good or bad.

And in a baseball context, when you hear terms like "grit" and "scrappiness," they're usually applied to David Eckstein-type of players who aren't as physically gifted as other players but are always hustling, getting their uniform dirty, being a pest on the basepaths, etc.

That description doesn't fit Trumbo at all. He's a 6-foot-4 slugger who crushes monster homeruns. He's not some scrappy overachiever who's overcoming physical limitations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PaulFolk said:

And in a baseball context, when you hear terms like "grit" and "scrappiness," they're usually applied to David Eckstein-type of players who aren't as physically gifted as other players but are always hustling, getting their uniform dirty, being a pest on the basepaths, etc.

That description doesn't fit Trumbo at all. He's a 6-foot-4 slugger who crushes monster homeruns. He's not some scrappy overachiever who's overcoming physical limitations.

Well DD didn't call Trumbo "scrappy", but I do think your point is valid. It was a dumb comment, that much cannot be debated. I just don't see it having any racial undertones, unlike the Deadspin article and what other posters have implied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ChinMusic said:

Old school baseball guys say dumb, meaningless stuff like this all the time. Such as "I like the way the ball comes out of his hand." I would categorize "grit" and "scrappiness" and other meaningless words and phrases the same way. I don't think you can apply anything truly meaningful to any of it, good or bad.

Be careful.  Real old schools (pre-1957) were segregated.  You might inadvertently be stepping onto thin ice.  Is "thin ice"OK to say in this thread?  Are ice skaters mostly racist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dan-O said:

Exactly! Just an inane comment in so many ways.

Caleb Joseph, who grinded for years to get better in the minors, is a better example. Adam Jones, raised by a single mom, is a better example. Givens, who turned a failed career as a shortstop into playing on the world stage in the WBC as a pitcher, is a better example. 

Again, Trumbo was used as an example because there was a choice between re-signing him versus going for Bautista instead. This has nothing to do with who the most "working class" guy on the O's is. It's about Trumbo versus Bautista. That's it.

The working class comment was really odd, but it has nothing to do with anyone else currently on the Orioles. The Deadspin article and posters here seem to be confused about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dan-O said:

I basically agree. I'm just using it as an opportunity to shine some light on these dumb terms that people still use. I get where Dan was going with it and how he got there, I really do, with the comparing of FAs. That said, yeah, we hate Bautista, but we absolutely would have embraced him if he was an Oriole and helped us win. To suggest otherwise is idiotic. 

Speak for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dan-O said:

I basically agree. I'm just using it as an opportunity to shine some light on these dumb terms that people still use. I get where Dan was going with it and how he got there, I really do, with the comparing of FAs. That said, yeah, we hate Bautista, but we absolutely would have embraced him if he was an Oriole and helped us win. To suggest otherwise is idiotic. 

i'm with you there. Baseball, of all sports, seems to have the most outdated and meaningless phrases to describe skills and players. For example, why are only lefty pitchers considered "crafty"? It's very rare to hear a right-hander called "crafty", that is unless he's a knuckleballer.

I only take issue with the implication that this is a racial thing, which seems silly and unproductive to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dan-O said:

I hate him as much as the next guy. But that's my point, Dan should not speak for everyone. Certainly if Bautista comes in and helps us win a title, the majority of fans will applaud him. 

He's gone on long enough with this weird narrative that is pretty unfounded, honestly. Get good players, don't worry about what the fans think. I'm happy with Trumbo, but stop pretending you know anything about how Orioles fans feel or what we prefer. 

Worrying about what the fans think is an explicit part of his job description, right up there near the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Worrying about what the fans think is an explicit part of his job description, right up there near the top.

No way.  His job is to win.  If Bautista helped the O's win a WS, there's no way fans in Baltimore would still dislike him.

A lot of people didn't like Nelson Cruz when we signed him (obviously not to the magnitude of Joey Bats).  Now he's one of the most popular players on the field when Seattle visits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dan-O said:

And I'm not saying that Jose would have been a better sign. I actually don't think he would be. He's likely to get injured and miss a bunch of time, and Trumbo is likely to hit 40 bombs again, if we're talking straight up probability here. 

But Dan's mistaken if he thinks he winning fan favor by saying stuff like this. It just comes off as kind of stupid. Wouldn't you rather Dan was confident in his player moves because of scouting or data or literally anything other than "I don't think the city likes him"?

Seven MLB seasons.

One 40 hr season.

Likely.

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

 

A lot of people didn't like Nelson Cruz when we signed him (obviously not to the magnitude of Joey Bats).  Now he's one of the most popular players on the field when Seattle visits.

I liked him then and I like him now.  I was sorry that he was a PED user, but I still liked him. And the fans did. And Duquette did. Gave him the second highest offer his free agent season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Funny thing is, if the O's win, I'm generally so psyched on my way out that I don't even notice all of these annoyances. I'm just happy that the team won. That was my experience a lot this year when the team was doing well. Unfortunately about half of my 13 game season ticket plan was in August and September, plus I got to watch one of the pathetic WC games. You can smooth over a fair bit of fan annoyance with winning, but at the end of the day, someone has to care about the little things and actually invest money to make them better. There's no longer any question about whether the O's will be here to stay. The government and the team are aligned: OPACY and the Orioles are here, and we're going to make the best of what we have, and make it a centerpiece of Baltimore. That's great. But now they have to put their money where their mouths are. Show fans from all walks of life that we are able to reimagine OPACY and the surrounding area in the image of an efficient, clean, 21st century facility, starting with things as basic as infrastructure and plumbing, and ranging as far as parking, public trans, and food at the park. Honestly? I sort-of understood why they weren't investing in anything in the years when (1) the team was bad, and (2) ownership wasn't invested in the team, and (3) the renewal of the lease with the Maryland Stadium Authority was in doubt. The vast majority of points (1), (2) and (3) above are now non-issues, or have been majorly mitigated in the past 2 years. So it's time to make things right. Otherwise why bother with the long-term commitment at all, if you're just going to let the project languish?
    • Get Gurgi on massive doses of Xanax so he's positive in every game thread.
    • https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/the-roof-of-tropicana-field-was-ripped-off-by-hurricane-miltons-winds And the hurricane was a direct hit on Sarasota... in coming days we will se ehow the Orioles' facilities there fared.   I assume that the fall instructional camp had already completed?
    • Highlight: Dodgers at Padres (10/08/2024) | MLB Gameday According to the announcers, Manny said that Buck Showalter taught him this.
    • I still think Soto (Juan, not any of the others) checks off all the boxes here.  Insanely productive, plays hard, can rub opponents the wrong way on the field but is generally liked off of it.
    • We're not a mid-market team. Small market for sure.
    • Things looking bleak for KC. They left 11 runners on base, got a taste of their own medicine, I guess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...