Jump to content

TT: A timeshare with Castillo and Joseph may be good for Orioles


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

I'd like to see Joseph start 60ish games, provided he hits a little.   He looked pretty good with the bat in spring training.   

As to whether his poor hitting was due to sporadic playing time last year, it's a bit hard to say.    Buck actually started him 30 times in April, May and July (he missed June with his injury), so he was playing twice a week or more.    He didn't hit, and so he rode the pine down the stretch (10 starts in August/September).    It's not like Buck was riding Wieters that hard in the first part of the season.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

I'd like to see Joseph start 60ish games, provided he hits a little.   He looked pretty good with the bat in spring training.   

As to whether his poor hitting was due to sporadic playing time last year, it's a bit hard to say.    Buck actually started him 30 times in April, May and July (he missed June with his injury), so he was playing twice a week or more.    He didn't hit, and so he rode the pine down the stretch (10 starts in August/September).    It's not like Buck was riding Wieters that hard in the first part of the season.   

For what it's worth:

  • BABIP tanked last year.  It was .221, down from .246 and .269 in 2014 and 2015, respectively.
  • GB rate was up (33.5% -> 41.3%).
  • FB rate (43.1% -> 39.4%) and LD rate (23.4% -> 19.2%) were both down.
  • Walk rate and K rate both decreased.
  • Medium contact % increased at the expense of hard contact %.
  • Pulled the ball way less (32% vs. 38% and 48% in prior years).  Up the middle stayed consistent.  Oppo field way more.

This all combines to paint a picture of Caleb doing a much worse job of squaring up on the ball I would think, which conforms with what we saw I guess.  Whether or not that was driven by irregular playing time is really anybody's guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

For what it's worth:

  • BABIP tanked last year.  It was .221, down from .246 and .269 in 2014 and 2015, respectively.
  • GB rate was up (33.5% -> 41.3%).
  • FB rate (43.1% -> 39.4%) and LD rate (23.4% -> 19.2%) were both down.
  • Walk rate and K rate both decreased.
  • Medium contact % increased at the expense of hard contact %.
  • Pulled the ball way less (32% vs. 38% and 48% in prior years).  Up the middle stayed consistent.  Oppo field way more.

This all combines to paint a picture of Caleb doing a much worse job of squaring up on the ball I would think, which conforms with what we saw I guess.  Whether or not that was driven by irregular playing time is really anybody's guess.

I know it doesn't always mean anything, but he was squaring up pretty good during his rehab in the minors and his time after being optioned to Norfolk, including several home runs and solid hits (and a game winning rbi.) It might have just been "one of those years."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I know it doesn't always mean anything, but he was squaring up pretty good during his rehab in the minors and his time after being optioned to Norfolk, including several home runs and solid hits (and a game winning rbi.) It might have just been "one of those years."

No doubt, it certainly may have been just "one of those years."  None of this was supposed to be revealing of true cause.  More of identifying that it wasn't simply poor luck with a bunch of hard hit liners right at defenders.  Further, this was only in-game at ML level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BohKnowsBmore said:

No doubt, it certainly may have been just "one of those years."  None of this was supposed to be revealing of true cause.  More of identifying that it wasn't simply poor luck with a bunch of hard hit liners right at defenders.  Further, this was only in-game at ML level.

Agreed. Last year was a year he should not buy a lottery ticket. I remember the last game of the season, he *just* missed hitting the foul pole in left. What made it so bad was, there was no wind until the second he made contact, then the wind came in from right to left and pushed it foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joseph was an average major league catcher in 2015. Basically Wellington Castillo in a bad year. If he produced anything close to that at all, Castillo probably wouldn't be in Baltimore right now. But, then 2016 happened, and even a significant improvement from that would mean Joseph is not a productive offensive player. His 2014 production is probably what we can expect moving forward. If that does turn out to be true, his current role on the team of a back-up and on the bench 4 of 5 nights is appropriate. Castillo is actually younger, plus obviously getting paid more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

Joseph was an average major league catcher in 2015. Basically Wellington Castillo in a bad year. If he produced anything close to that at all, Castillo probably wouldn't be in Baltimore right now. But, then 2016 happened, and even a significant improvement from that would mean Joseph is not a productive offensive player. His 2014 production is probably what we can expect moving forward. If that does turn out to be true, his current role on the team of a back-up and on the bench 4 of 5 nights is appropriate. Castillo is actually younger, plus obviously getting paid more.

He's also just a better player.  He's had a 4.5 WAR season in 2013.  Career OBP is about 50 points higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

For what it's worth:

  • BABIP tanked last year.  It was .221, down from .246 and .269 in 2014 and 2015, respectively.
  • GB rate was up (33.5% -> 41.3%).
  • FB rate (43.1% -> 39.4%) and LD rate (23.4% -> 19.2%) were both down.
  • Walk rate and K rate both decreased.
  • Medium contact % increased at the expense of hard contact %.
  • Pulled the ball way less (32% vs. 38% and 48% in prior years).  Up the middle stayed consistent.  Oppo field way more.

This all combines to paint a picture of Caleb doing a much worse job of squaring up on the ball I would think, which conforms with what we saw I guess.  Whether or not that was driven by irregular playing time is really anybody's guess.

Great numbers. Using the eye test, Caleb looked weaker last year at the plate. He wasn't getting around on pitches like he did in prior seasons.

It wouldn't surprise me if he was dealing with injuries that led to his problems. Hopefully his body is right and he shows that 2016 was just a blip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...