Jump to content

Dempsey strongly implied last night that he hated Wieters' pitch-calling


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 hours ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Doesn't really matter what they thought he'd do; the context of our conversation was that DD quickly wanted to shut the door and be rid of Matt Wieters. They offered him a QO last season instead of letting him go to FA, or trading him mid 2015. Seems to me that there was no haste to be rid of him, and even just an offer of QO is evidence enough to me that they entertained the thought of keeping him around.

To be fair, they gave Matt the qualifying offer primarily because they assumed he would refuse it and sign somewhere else, giving them a high compensation pick. Nobody had taken the offer before and Wieters had pretty much the last agent you would have expected would let his client take it. Trading him simply wasn't an option in the middle of 2015 because he didn't return to playing after his Tommy John surgery until June. He was too much of a risk for anyone to offer them anything close to the value of the comp pick they assumed they would get. It's not like getting rid of him was an act of desperation, but when the opportunity arose for them to move on and sign Castillo they didn't blink. There are a lot of things over which I'm critical of Duquette and the front office. This is not one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dan-O said:

I don't question that. My comment is in regards to his broadcasting skills and opinions about the team over the years. I like the guy enough, he just makes me roll my eyes. 

Dempsey grinds my gears something awful but when he talks baseball, you listen. Played for 20 years, managed in the minors for almost as long. He probably knows more pure baseball than Buck!

And I remember Dempsey railing on the broadcast about 0-2 FBs last year maybe? Got pretty fired up about it too. Tom Davis was joking about it. He was saying if you call the same pitch over and over the hitter and the runner will know what's coming. (Duh.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two cents worth...

It seems to me that Castillo relies too heavily on his glove on pitches in the dirt. I always felt that MW was very good at dropping to his knees and using his body to the keep the pitch in front of him. On the bright side, Beef seems to be very good at digging those pitches out.

I also noticed that Castillo can get very animated at times. He's almost like a cheerleader behind the plate. I like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rich Mac said:

My two cents worth...

It seems to me that Castillo relies too heavily on his glove on pitches in the dirt. I always felt that MW was very good at dropping to his knees and using his body to the keep the pitch in front of him. On the bright side, Beef seems to be very good at digging those pitches out.

I also noticed that Castillo can get very animated at times. He's almost like a cheerleader behind the plate. I like that.

I've noticed this too. He made some very impressive one-handed stops on Britton's sinker last night but it's not the best way to do it. Matt was very good at that.

 

I like his cheerleading tho too! One of the reasons I like Caleb too. Both animated back there, giving a good target, gesturing to the pitcher to get it down on the ground or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SteveA said:

You mean like when he said that Arrieta was the best of the young pitchers that came up around this time, and most people laughed at him?

Or that Chris Davis was going to have a 50-plus-home run season someday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So Dempsey is saying these things and everyone is talking about Wieters.

Well Joseph has caught 210 games over the prior three seasons.

So wouldn't this also be about him?

When I saw it last year Caleb was by default guilty too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

On the post-game show last night, Rick Dempsey was effusive in his praise of Welington Castillo's pitch calling, saying things like "finally we have a catcher who will call something other than a fastball with two strikes and a runner on base!"    He never mentioned Wieters by name, but he gave the distinct impression that he thought Wieters was a lousy pitch-caller and that Castillo is a big improvement.    I was kind of surprised how blunt he was.

I know there are some posters who were critical of Wieters' pitch-calling at times, but it was usually criticism of a specific sequence, rather than a general statement.    I think Dempsey is overstating things, as he always tends to do anyways, but I'm curious what others think.

One difference I have noticed is that Wieters always called a lot of fastballs in the first couple of innings, whereas Castillo seems more inclined to show all the pitches right away.   

Wieters poor pitch calling is widely accepted by most scouts and baseball people. As I'm sure you know, I was never a fan of his game calling and always felt the pitchers pitched better with most of the backups (besides Clevinger).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...