Jump to content

Jones Playing Deeper in 2017


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Instinctively, that doesn't seem true.   Bolt can run the 100 meter dash in 9.6 seconds; for Hamilton, it's probably in the high 10's.    So how can Bolt run 50% faster than Hamilton at top speed (30 mph vs. 20 mph).     Something must be wrong there.   

Bolt and most sprinters reach top speed at 40 Yards and then begin to slow so his top is 30 mph and average is 23. something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Put a glove on him, baseball spikes, run on grass, and turn his head while he's running and let's see what the gap is.

Good point.    That probably answers my question about the gap between them.   

I'm old enough to remember when Bob Hayes played wide receiver for the Cowboys.    I'm sure he didn't run a 9.1 100-yard dash in his football gear, but he sure ran faster than anyone else by a pretty clear margin.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Bolt and most sprinters reach top speed at 40 Yards and then begin to slow so his top is 30 mph and average is 23. something.

The Statcast measurement is also at top speed, but outfielders aren't usually running 40 yards to catch the ball.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Where was Trumbo???

Between 25/26 ft/sec.   That's in the bottom 10 of 79 outfielders with 100 chances in each of 2025/16.     Seth Smith and Hyun Soo Kim are also in the 25-26 range.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were a couple of deep fly balls last night that Jones seemed to be camped under instead of having to sprint back.  Also if Jones mis plays a ball and it goes over his head like Hardy's did to Hamilton last night, it was probably going to be an inside the park homer and we lose.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

He was faster when he got to Baltimore.   I definitely would say he had CF-worthy speed, possibly  above average.    Like most people, he's not as fast at 31 as he was at 22.

I think he has also shown good speed on the base paths this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Good point.    That probably answers my question about the gap between them.   

I'm old enough to remember when Bob Hayes played wide receiver for the Cowboys.    I'm sure he didn't run a 9.1 100-yard dash in his football gear, but he sure ran faster than anyone else by a pretty clear margin.     

I remember Darrel Green was still one of the fastest guys in the NFL. But, he said the difference was, he was good for 1 or 2 40 yard dashes at speed, instead of 10+, when he was 21. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

He was faster when he got to Baltimore.   I definitely would say he had CF-worthy speed, possibly  above average.    Like most people, he's not as fast at 31 as he was at 22.

I know this is a very imperfect way to judge it, but just saying he's never looked fast to me is worth nothing so I have to bring what I have. Even in his youth Adam Jones was never a stolen base threat compared to other center fielders. He has generally been in the bottom 5 every year he has qualified with 2 exceptions. He's never been even close to the average or median number of stolen bases among center fielders in his career.

Obviously, stolen bases don't have everything to do with speed and this is not definitive evidence of his relative speed among major league center fielders, but it is something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

I know this is a very imperfect way to judge it, but just saying he's never looked fast to me is worth nothing so I have to bring what I have. Even in his youth Adam Jones was never a stolen base threat compared to other center fielders. He has generally been in the bottom 5 every year he has qualified with 2 exceptions. He's never been even close to the average or median number of stolen bases among center fielders in his career.

Obviously, stolen bases don't have everything to do with speed and this is not definitive evidence of his relative speed among major league center fielders, but it is something.

I see the logic in what you're saying.    However, I need to point out a mitigating factor.   Early in his career, Adam was terrible at getting a decent lead off 1B.   He couldn't read pickoff moves and would stay very close to the base to compensate.    It was only when Wayne Kirby got here that he finally learned how to get a decent lead.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...