Jump to content

The Blue Jays Series (May 19th, 20th, and 21st)


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, webbrick2010 said:

Slow to post lineup, as of 4:41 the O's are the only team in a 7-8 PM game to have not posted a lineup

Buck must be having trouble finding healthy bodies

It might get so bad that Kim will even have to be in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gausman can't do pretty well against the lineup the BJs are now putting out there, even I would have to concede that he may not be able to stay in the rotation. I expect a few runs, maybe a homer or two (if so I hope it's not Bautista), but he's got to be able to keep the walks down and the bases relatively clear against this group. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

If Gausman can't do pretty well against the lineup the BJs are now putting out there, even I would have to concede that he may not be able to stay in the rotation. I expect a few runs, maybe a homer or two (if so I hope it's not Bautista), but he's got to be able to keep the walks down and the bases relatively clear against this group. 

This year or long term?  I think either way you let him continue to work.  (1) we have no better options in the short term, (2) he's coming off a very strong year, so it's not like he's never had success at the big league level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

This year or long term?  I think either way you let him continue to work.  (1) we have no better options in the short term, (2) he's coming off a very strong year, so it's not like he's never had success at the big league level.

What I meant is that another poor performance will make me question, as others have, whether we will go through this season with Gausman (if he's not injured) in the rotation. I never questioned that until his last start. 

You're right, of course, that there aren't a lot of real good ;options (though I think Asher or Verrett are possibilities), and there could be a question as to whether replacing Gausman or Ubaldo should have priority. I don't agree that Kevin's past success, or his demonstrated talent, is a reason for letting him continue to cost us games. It provides a basis for expecting him to pitch better than he has, but only up to a point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2017 at 1:22 PM, OFFNY said:

o

 

Two struggling teams.

The Blue Jays just lost 3 out of 4 games to the Braves.

The Orioles just lost 2 outs of 3 games to the Tigers, and 6 out of 7 overall.

 

Opposite Dugout: Injuries, Altercations, and Now a Suspension Haunt the Blue Jays

(By Zach Wilt)

http://www.masnsports.com/orioles-buzz/2017/05/opposite-dugout-blue-jays-4.html

 

o

o

 

The Orioles wound up winning 2 out of 3.

It could have been better, it could have been worse.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yeah, but the Rangers had one of the best performing lineups in baseball throughout the playoffs. The Orioles consistently go MIA on offense. Very Inconsistent. If you have a subpar bullpen, you need an offense that can score enough to bail them out. (And vica versa).
    • Tarrasco definitely thought he was catching it, you can tell by his reaction.
    • Not sure about that.  The ball is coming almost straight down at that point.   Tarascó doesn’t even think he has to jump to catch it.
    • Of course the outcome of the play should matter, and in both the videos you linked, the outcome was affected.  And a facemask call is not comparable, since that rule exists due to player safety.
    • Reminds me of one of my son's games when he was 12.  The other team had bases loaded with 1 out and the next batter hit a pretty routine pop up.  The umpires invoked the infield fly rule.  Of course, our Shortstop dropped the pop up (as 12 year olds sometimes do)...   Some of the baserunners thought they then had to try to advance and started running.  One of the runners thought it was a dead ball and he should walk back to the bag. There were runners running in all different directions, some forwards, some backwards... Then the infielders started throwing the ball away during the ensuing rundowns...   I think they managed to finally get a guy out at home ending that inning...   It was sheer pandemonium.  The umpires were laughing...
    • No way Tarrasco was getting that ball.  But I do think it might have hit the top of the fence for an extra-base hit and not an HR...
    • Are you looking for an infield fly runner's interference?  Because as far as I know, it's been 12 years since this exact situation was called.  This is the play that caused the rule to be changed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJu3RL8CV_8   They let the runner bat again and called the 1st base runner out in this case, and then in the offseason clarified the rule to say that both the runner and the batter are out.  But in this case the runner's interference was fairly substantial direct contact.   If you're talking about runners interference in general, on this play Kieboom didn't touch the runner and it was called runner's interference.   https://www.mlb.com/video/yadier-molina-grounds-into-a-force-out-fielded-by-shortstop-carter-kieboom-marcell-ozuna-out-at-3rd-jose-martinez-to-2nd-yadier-molina-to-1st?q=5%2F1%2F2019 stl vs was&cp=CMS_FIRST&qt=FREETEXT&p=3   The outcome of the play shouldn't really matter.  If you commit a face mask in football, and the guy whose face mask you grabbed gets a sack-fumble and recovers, you still get the ball and you get 15 yards.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...