Jump to content

When do the O's fish or cut bait with Duquette and Showalter?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Hardy had the second lowest OBP on the team among regulars.  So that means that six players in any given lineup would have been better suited to bat second.  It would go leadoff hitter, anyone other than Hardy or Schoop, third hitter.

It is not as if Hardy brought speed or even bunting acumen to the table. 

Now obviously lineup construction is a minor issue as is stuff like Buck using hitter/pitcher matchups.  Overall he's very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hardy had the second lowest OBP on the team among regulars.  So that means that six players in any given lineup would have been better suited to bat second.  It would go leadoff hitter, anyone other than Hardy or Schoop, third hitter.

It is not as if Hardy brought speed or even bunting acumen to the table. 

Now obviously lineup construction is a minor issue as is stuff like Buck using hitter/pitcher matchups.  Overall he's very good.

And quibbling over it 5 years later is obsessive :deadhorse:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

One opinion I hear a lot around here is that Dan Duquette and Buck Showalter don't really care what happens here beyond 2018, because their contracts expire then.    To me, that begs the question, when is it time to fish or cut bait with these two?

With Duquette, my opinion is he should either get a new contract or be replaced at the end of this season.   I don't want a lame duck running my baseball operations based exclusively on short term considerations.    And I'd rather know soon whether he wants to stay -- if we want him to.

I feel a bit differently about Buck.   First, I absolutely want him extended this offseason.    However, if he were to say he planned to retire at the end of his contract, or that he wanted to wait until the end of next year to make up his mind, I'd still want him around for 2018.     I just don't want him to walk into the 2018 season without having had the opportunity to extend.     

It's just up to the owner. What I worry about is the owner picking someone that would be worse than DD. This organization has things backward. The GM should pick his on manager and the manager pick his staff. IMO 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I truly can't believe what I am reading.  The combination of Dan and Buck have done something that has not been done under Peter Angelos in 23 years.  They have a winning record for 4 out of 5 years and went to the playoff in 3 years.  In fact the only GM/Manager team in O's history to do that is Harry Dalton and Earl Weaver in 1968-71.   I don't think a lot of O's fans appreciate what Dan and Buck have achieved.

I hope that Dan get promoted to President of Baseball Ops and gets the raise he deserves.  It should happen this off season.  Buck should get a good raise as well this off season and extended.  There should be no lame duck status for either of them. John Angelos should be promote of Vice Chairman.

As far as rebuilding.  A team with a 165m payroll does not rebuild.  It reloads.  Too many fans have forgotten how it feels to lose for 14 years.  Personally,  I don't want to go back there.

 

The alea Lane DullesVA 20166

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

I truly can't believe what I am reading.  The combination of Dan and Buck have done something that has not been done under Peter Angelos in 23 years.  The have a winning record for 4 out of 5 years and went to the playoff in 3 years.  In fact the only GM/Manager team in O's history to do that is Harry Dalton and Earl Weaver in 1968-71.   I don't think a lot of O's fans appreciate what Dan and Buck have achieved.

I hope that Dan get promoted to President of Baseball Ops and gets the raise he deserves.  It should happen his off season.  Buck should get a good raise as well this off season and extended.  There should be no lame duck status for either of them. John Angelos should be promote of Vice Chairman.

As far as rebuilding.  A team with a 165m payroll does not rebuild.  It reloads.  Too many fans have forgotten how it feels to lose for 14 years.  Personally,  I don't want to go back there.

 

The alea Lane DullesVA 20166

Wow. This came straight from my mouth without all the sarcasm/cynasism. Go you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think he's very good if you buy the image or not.

He's tactically sound and his players love to play for him.

 

That's true, but he got LUCKY last year. He was over-managing his ass off in the WS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I truly can't believe what I am reading.  The combination of Dan and Buck have done something that has not been done under Peter Angelos in 23 years.  They have a winning record for 4 out of 5 years and went to the playoff in 3 years.  In fact the only GM/Manager team in O's history to do that is Harry Dalton and Earl Weaver in 1968-71.   I don't think a lot of O's fans appreciate what Dan and Buck have achieved.

I hope that Dan get promoted to President of Baseball Ops and gets the raise he deserves.  It should happen his off season.  Buck should get a good raise as well this off season and extended.  There should be no lame duck status for either of them. John Angelos should be promote of Vice Chairman.

As far as rebuilding.  A team with a 165m payroll does not rebuild.  It reloads.  Too many fans have forgotten how it feels to lose for 14 years.  Personally,  I don't want to go back there.

 

The alea Lane DullesVA 20166

Brace yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

That's true, but he got LUCKY last year. He was over-managing his ass off in the WS.

The team won the WS. That's all that counts. After 108 years of futility the Cubs won. He must have done something right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I wouldn't mind if we are Houston in 2020. Need to look at the big picture and rebuild smartly. Not let everyone walk out the door after 2018. 

Houston had six straight losing seasons including three 100+ losing seasons before they started winning again.  How do you propose the Orioles go through that cycle in 2.5 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

Houston had six straight losing seasons including three 100+ losing seasons before they started winning again.  How do you propose the Orioles go through that cycle in 2.5 years?

Plus, there is no guarantee that system works. How many examples of a torched rebuild failing? Or at best taking a couple of torched to get it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The unabashed love for Buck despite repeated horrendous decisions over and over and over again, vs the hate for Duquette (building very good teams with one arm tied behind his back, while pulling gem after gem off the scrap heap) on this board and the fanbase in general is sickening. 

I can't wait until he is run out of town after what he has done the past 5 years, and we have a completely unqualified owner favorite running the team straight into the ground. Gonna be great around here then, probably will still find a way to make excuses for Buck. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...