Jump to content

2017 17th round pick (518): Greg Jones - SS - Cary HS


Recommended Posts

Have heard he isn't set on UNC-W, but the fact he'd only have to stay there two years means he has some leverage.

https://2080baseball.com/2017/06/2017-mlb-draft-positional-previews-middle-infielders/

Quote

Greg Jones, SS, Cary (Cary, NC)
Ht/Wt: 5’11”/185          B/T: S/R          Age (as of 2017 MLB Draft): 19y, 3m

Jones’s calling card is his elite speed, with the North Carolina prep product capable of breaking off sub-4.0 second home-to-first times from both sides of the plate. Jones has undergone a huge growth spurt over the past 12 months, growing six inches and adding 15 to 20 good pounds in the process, making him a much more interesting draft prospect this spring than he was last summer. The timing of the growth spurt has put some teams behind the eight ball, as there isn’t a long book on “this version” of Jones performing against top high school talent, and the early end of his high school season made it difficult for some decision-makers to get quality looks.

At the plate, Jones has a simple swing that checks out from both sides of the plate, with the UNC Wilmington commit profiling as a top-of-the-order type bat who can spray hard contact to all fields and drive the gaps for extra bases. His limited track record, as well as some questions as to whether he’s truly an infielder long term or better fit in center field, could see him drop far enough that it would make sense to go to college and try to up his value with increased exposure and performance over the next two seasons (he is already 19 years old and would be draft eligible again as a sophomore in 2019). Presently he projects as a third- to fifth-round selection.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We could have offered the guy 513 + 125 for 638k to sign. I wonder if we made that offer?

That is a question that can be asked about several draftees. It appears the Os did not have, or were not interested in, a backup plan if they failed to sign Conlon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, stef said:

That is a question that can be asked about several draftees. It appears the Os did not have, or were not interested in, a backup plan if they failed to sign Conlon.

Signing Conlon was not really in doubt, was it?  Seems to me he was pretty gung ho to sign.  His failing the physical is what caused the problem - not a lack of planning.  Are you saying that they should have expected that he fail the physical before the draft?  You can believe that no consideration or effort was given to try to sign any of the  potential over-slot draft picks once he failed the physical if you wish, but all indications are that those efforts were made.  Bishop was reportedly flown into Baltimore.  Just wanted an eclair from Vaccaro's, maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The underslot savings needs to be spent on the draft.  We should have prospects ready to sign at various $ intervals in case something like this happens or something opens up - especially someone in this case worthy or $600k bonus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like Jones wanted to take the gamble and go to college for two years. Who knows what we offered him?  Obviously not enough. I think he made the right decision. Especially if he lives up to his potential. 

I'm glad we drafted him. He was more of the backup plan if Hall didn't sign. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2017 at 10:51 AM, Number5 said:

Signing Conlon was not really in doubt, was it?  Seems to me he was pretty gung ho to sign.  His failing the physical is what caused the problem - not a lack of planning.  Are you saying that they should have expected that he fail the physical before the draft?  You can believe that no consideration or effort was given to try to sign any of the  potential over-slot draft picks once he failed the physical if you wish, but all indications are that those efforts were made.  Bishop was reportedly flown into Baltimore.  Just wanted an eclair from Vaccaro's, maybe?

Well, I think I made that comment before I knew of the possible Bishop signing (which, if obando's post is true has turned into a mess but that's a separate issue). But, yes, I'll stand by what I said. If you are going to draft a lot of HS pitchers (or college pitchers with high counts for that matter) you should have a plan b, c and d because you can be sure that one or more are not going to pass the dreaded Os physical (rightly or wrongly). DD knows what he is dealing with.

Back to Bishop: are those eclairs worth the trip? I hope that's not all he gets out of it. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...