Jump to content

Baseball America 2017 Midseason Top 10


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Reyes is 17th on mlb.com.  Other than that, they had the same people in the top 10 except they had Santander at 9 - giving him a 55 for power.    

Re Reyes, we always give him the excuse for his age, and still - at 20 years old - I get it.  But this is the last year we give him the age out.  And it's flat out silly to put him ahead of Mullins.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, survivedc said:

What does Wells have to do to get some love?

 

19 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Throw 93.

Yep, apparently.     But I guess it's a good sign that BA thinks we have ten better prospects than Wells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Mlb.com has Wells at 16 - at the tail end of 6 straight pitchers: 

11: Bauman, 12: Sedlock, 13: Lowther, 14: Bishop, 15: Hanifee. 

If it was me, I'd put Wells first among that group.  

 

 

You can teach a guy with great stuff how to pitch.

It is hard to teach a guy who knows how to pitch how to throw great stuff.

 

I think his command and pitch-ability won't be enough against more advanced hitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You can teach a guy with great stuff how to pitch.

It is hard to teach a guy who knows how to pitch how to throw great stuff.

 

I think his command and pitch-ability won't be enough against more advanced hitters.

I can't argue with your logic, but with him being 20 years old, isn't there a reasonable chance that his fastball will gain a couple of mph's?  When someone performs as well as he has (in both of his seasons), I tend to look more at what he can do vs what he can't do.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You can teach a guy with great stuff how to pitch.

It is hard to teach a guy who knows how to pitch how to throw great stuff.

 

I think his command and pitch-ability won't be enough against more advanced hitters.

Zach Davies says hi.    To be fair, Tony was higher on Davies than on Wells.     

I think several of the listed guys have higher ceilings than Wells, but I might rank Wells the highest in terms of probability of making it to the majors, even if he'd never be more than a back-end starter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Zach Davies says hi.    To be fair, Tony was higher on Davies than on Wells.     

I think several of the listed guys have higher ceilings than Wells, but I might rank Wells the highest in terms of probability of making it to the majors, even if he'd never be more than a back-end starter.  

Didn't say it couldn't happen Frobby.  Just that I didn't think it would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...