Jump to content

POLL: Yay or nay on Beckham trade?


PaulFolk

POLL: Do you like the Tim Beckham trade?  

133 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Tim Beckham trade?

    • Yes. Beckham is under control through 2020 and could be the SS of the future.
      92
    • No. We should be acquiring prospects, not trading them away.
      24
    • Meh. Nothing lost, nothing gained.
      17

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply
14 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

This deal will take 5 years to judge. 

Agreed.    Could work out well, could be a disaster.    If you want to see the team go into rebuild mode, you should hate the deal.    If you want them to retool a bit, this may work out, but time will tell.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Me too.   And 3 doesn't really fit.   

Yeah, that's why I didn't vote.   Don't like it enough for 1, don't dislike it enough for 2.  But don't feel "nothing lost, nothign gained" either.   We may have gained an adequate starter for the next three years, and we may have lost a future starting pitcher.   Just don't know for sure.

So I abstained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2017 at 6:51 PM, phillyOs119 said:

First time seeing him, watching on milb.tv, bad camera angle for pitch recognition.

 

Righty, medium build, athletic on the mound, good arm speed.  Not a ton of projectability, maybe room for a little muscle.  Only velocity reading given by announcers was one fastball at 93mph.  The fastball looks pretty straight and doesn't have an ideal downward plane, that said, the pitch was jumping on guys, there was one lefty batter who whiffed on a fastball middle middle.  When it was up or in a predictable fastball count though, it got hit firmly a few times.

He throws a big breaking curveball, but I'd guess it's on the harder side.  It looks like a promising pitch (wish I had a better angle to see it), generating a whiff or two, and plenty of bad swings/weak contact.  There were one or two he didn't get on top of, but for the most part he was around the plate with it.  Also saw a change-up with solid arm-side fade get two whiffs, it looks like he threw it too firm sometimes (again, better angle would help).  Overall command was below average and control was average, although I think the delivery could be cleaned up a little bit and those would improve.  He did show the ability to move the ball around, it was just quite inconsistent.

 

This is what I wrote about Myers after watching a start. 

I'm torn on this, I like Myers and I think he's a good prospect ( I've watched almost every pitch he's thrown this year).  He is a long way away though, he isn't particularly protectable and to be an impact, top 100 type of guy he'll need to have plus control and command. 

If you believe in Beckham'slast 150 games, we got a ton of value for a lottery ticket. A good lottery ticket but it's rare to get a guy who has put up league average numbers, is controllable, and cheap for a guy so far away without premium stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...