Jump to content

Now That The Trade Deadline has Passed - Let's Go Out and Win this Thing


brianod

Recommended Posts

Just now, SteveA said:

Yay, we picked up a game on the Indians.   (If the Royals win the division, we would need to catch Cleveland).

I didn't watch of course until our game was over. What an ending. Allen blew it. Gomes had play at 1st on the K as well.  

Austin Jackson had the catch of the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think the division is pretty much out of reach, so I am not mad at Boston beating the Yankees and padding their record. I know it is a bit early, but that probably helps us the most in the long run. We just need to finish 2nd in the division and we probably get the wildcard. Beating up on the Royals obviously helps too in the process. Just keep fighting and you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TradeAngelos said:

I think the division is pretty much out of reach, so I am not mad at Boston beating the Yankees and padding their record. I know it is a bit early, but that probably helps us the most in the long run. We just need to finish 2nd in the division and we probably get the wildcard. Beating up on the Royals obviously helps too in the process. Just keep fighting and you never know.

6 games out is not out of reach.  Hell, I remember 82 like it was yesterday.  We were three games out with 4 games to play and almost won it. History is re-pleat with comebacks much bigger then what we have to do. I wouldn't say it's likely but its certainly within reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, brianod said:

6 games out is not out of reach.  Hell, I remember 82 like it was yesterday.  We were three games out with 4 games to play and almost won it. History is re-pleat with comebacks much bigger then what we have to do. I wouldn't say it's likely but its certainly within reach.

Numerically, no, 6 games is not out of reach.

Realistically speaking, however, the chances are impossibly small. On top of it being a substantial gap... the Yankees and Red Sox are simply better teams.

You can beat a better team in a 1-game playoff, or even in a short series. But catching them over a prolonged stretch is extraordinarily difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it boils down to pitching. The Yankees, Red Sox, Rays, and Royals all have better pitching than the Orioles. And the Orioles don't have the offense to compensate for the wide gap in pitching talent. It's fine to route for your home team to make a run, but as a GM and owner you have to take more of a realistic approach to evaluating your chances. This is not a team that is equipped to come from behind in the standings. Anyone can see that. I also think that, with his contract up after 2018, Duquette could care less about the long term future of this franchise. All he's looking to do is make another run at it so he can bolster his resume and land a job with someone else, because there's no chance the Oriole's resign him.  

Yankees - Lost Pineda, but replaced him with Gray and Garcia. Significantly improved their team. 

Red Sox - Lost Price hurts, but they have an in-house short-term contingency plan with Fister. They also significantly improved their pen by adding Addison Russell. He led the league in holds by a wide margin last season.I think the Red Sox arguably have the worst offense of the wild card contenders. 

Rays - IMO they had the best pitching staff (from top to bottom) in the AL East heading into the trade deadline. The Yankees may have jumped ahead of them,  with the Gray and Garcia acquisitions, but I still like the upside of their young starters, like Snell, who haven't "clicked" yet. Plenty of room to improve. 

Royals - They traded for Cahill. Not the sexist move, but he's their 5th starter (he'd be our #3!). No real standouts in their rotation, but they have solid, veteran pitchers who will keep them in games. 

Orioles - Traded for Hellickson, which really didn't add any depth because they will probably scale back Bundy's innings and skip a few of his starts. This means that Ubaldo is still in the rotation. Any rotation that trots Ubaldo out to the mound every 5th day is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Numerically, no, 6 games is not out of reach.

Realistically speaking, however, the chances are impossibly small. On top of it being a substantial gap... the Yankees and Red Sox are simply better teams.

You can beat a better team in a 1-game playoff, or even in a short series. But catching them over a prolonged stretch is extraordinarily difficult.

Exactly. 

The Red Sox are absolutely loaded with talent, especially at the top of their rotation. There is simply no conceivable way we can play well enough to overtake them in the long term. They were the prohibitive favorite going into the season for good reason. Our sights should be set on the wildcard, and every Yankee loss helps us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TradeAngelos said:

Exactly. 

The Red Sox are absolutely loaded with talent, especially at the top of their rotation. There is simply no conceivable way we can play well enough to overtake them in the long term. They were the prohibitive favorite going into the season for good reason. Our sights should be set on the wildcard, and every Yankee loss helps us

Meh, only if it's TO us. The Yankees are going to make October one way or another. Be it the division or the first WC. The O's are looking at the road team in the WC game, best case scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...