Jump to content

What's the most you'd offer any of Hardy, Jimenez, Miley, or Tillman to return?


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you really think it's that simple?

Explain Roberts' stretch in 2012.

Heck Dan had to trade Teagarden because Buck kept playing him.

I think you are stretching your point just a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you really think it's that simple?

Explain Roberts' stretch in 2012.

Heck Dan had to trade Teagarden because Buck kept playing him.

Andino had a .588 OPS  in 2012.   That is why Robert got a shot when he was available.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Andino had a .588 OPS  in 2012.   That is why Robert got a shot when he was available.  

Roberts put up a 415 and Buck kept running him out there, in a pennant race, until he was re-injured.

I have never seen a player more obviously not able to play at a ML level than Roberts was over those 17 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Roberts put up a 415 and Buck kept running him out there, in a pennant race, until he was re-injured.

I have never seen a player more obviously not able to play at a ML level than Roberts was over those 17 games.

I think that was a bit of a different situation. Roberts played in 17 games and couldn't get it going. Really we had no one better and if Roberts returned to form he would have been an improvement. 

The situation with Hardy is where we have someone who is probably a better player. I think Buck will realize that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

What makes you so sure Hardy would be able to play 2B/3B. He has never played them either in the MiL or the ML. I know Flaherty can and he would cost less than Hardy. Tejada can too and he would cost less than Flash. Hardy makes no sense.

i agree with Frobby;      "Considering the amount of shifting the Orioles do, I think Hardy would have zero difficulty playing 2B -- he's spent plenty of time on that side of the diamond even while playing SS.   I don't think he'd have that hard a time at 3B either"  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lucky_13 said:

I think that was a bit of a different situation. Roberts played in 17 games and couldn't get it going. Really we had no one better and if Roberts returned to form he would have been an improvement. 

The situation with Hardy is where we have someone who is probably a better player. I think Buck will realize that. 

Literally anyone in major league baseball would have been better than Roberts was over that stretch.

If Roberts hasn't been re-injured do you think Buck would have benched him?  After how many more games?  Five, ten, twenty?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lucky_13 said:

I think that was a bit of a different situation. Roberts played in 17 games and couldn't get it going. Really we had no one better and if Roberts returned to form he would have been an improvement. 

The situation with Hardy is where we have someone who is probably a better player. I think Buck will realize that. 

Do we have any examples of Buck benching one of "his guys"?  Feel free to include his stints in Texas, AZ and NY.

I'm hopeful that Beckham puts up such a strong case Buck has no choice in the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Literally anyone in major league baseball would have been better than Roberts was over that stretch.

If Roberts hasn't been re-injured do you think Buck would have benched him?  After how many more games?  Five, ten, twenty?

I think he would have given him 100 at bats. 

Buck does that a lot with players he wants to succeed. David Lough started alot in the beginning of 2014. Then with roughly 100 at bats, he started to see the bench. Rickard last year was similar. Buck gives guys he likes chances for better or worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do we have any examples of Buck benching one of "his guys"?  Feel free to include his stints in Texas, AZ and NY.

I'm hopeful that Beckham puts up such a strong case Buck has no choice in the matter.

I know Buck can be overly loyal. It's one of his flaws as a manager. But has buck ever had a situation like this? Where he has a young player be far better then his veteran guy? 

The difference between Andino and Roberts in 2012 was largely negligible. Another example of would be Jim Johnson but who on that 2013 roster was going to close if not for Johnson? I don't think O'day even in his prime was dominant enough to close. 

I'm not debating whether Buck is too loyal. I'm just saying the situation is different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lucky_13 said:

I know Buck can be overly loyal. It's one of his flaws as a manager. But has buck ever had a situation like this? Where he has a young player be far better then his veteran guy? 

The difference between Andino and Roberts in 2012 was largely negligible. Another example of would be Jim Johnson but who on that 2013 roster was going to close if not for Johnson? I don't think O'day even in his prime was dominant enough to close. 

I'm not debating whether Buck is too loyal. I'm just saying the situation is different. 

Andino was replacement level (.2rWAR).  Roberts was probably the worst player in the league -1.1 rWAR in 17 games.  That is not a negligible difference.  Fangraphs was much harsher on Andino (-.8) but Roberts was once again rated at -1.1 in 17 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, wildcard said:

i agree with Frobby;      "Considering the amount of shifting the Orioles do, I think Hardy would have zero difficulty playing 2B -- he's spent plenty of time on that side of the diamond even while playing SS.   I don't think he'd have that hard a time at 3B either"  

I wouldn't be too sure. And I doubt he would cost less than Flash or Tejada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...