Dodgers win despite being no-hit.

[Lester Freamon]

A very rare feat.

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2008_06_28_anamlb_lanmlb_1&mode=gameday

[RShack]

Wow.

It's even rarer when you score a run and *still* lose a no-hitter: http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL196704301.shtml

[Lester Freamon]

Wow.

It's even rarer when you score a run and *still* lose a no-hitter: http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL196704301.shtml

Aw man, that is one heck of a box score you posted shack. Barber, looks to have come within one out of completing the game. 10 walks (one intentional), 2 wild pitches and 2 hit batters, 2 runs (1 earned), 3 K's and no hits.

great stuff.

[ledzepp8]

And it technically wasn't a "no hitter".

[Lester Freamon]

And it technically wasn't a "no hitter".

True. The Angels needed to pitch nine innings for it to be a no-hitter (just saw that on Sports Center). I guess the title of the thread should be "Dodgers win without getting a hit".

[ledzepp8]

True. The Angels needed to pitch nine innings for it to be a no-hitter (just saw that on Sports Center). I guess the title of the thread should be "Dodgers win without getting a hit".

Yeah I think it's kind of silly how that's not considered a no hitter. It would still be considered a complete game wouldn't it?:scratchchinhmm:

[RShack]

Yeah I think it's kind of silly how that's not considered a no hitter. It would still be considered a complete game wouldn't it?:scratchchinhmm:

I think so.

Regardless, IMO not giving a guy a no-hitter for that is wrong. He faced everybody the other team sent up to the plate... although it was 2 guys, but still...