Jump to content

If Andy MacPhail was the O's GM....


wildcard

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

Considering that this was a buyer’s market, DD would have been perfectly justified waiting until the winter meetings to trade Gausman. 

The more I look at this trade the more I don’t like it. 

I think the problem here, Gausman is a fan favorite and likable guy, and we hate to see him go, and dangit, if he goes, lets get a haul for him.

Poor offense and poor defense, doesn't do zip when the pitcher has problems with fast ball command and off-speed pitches over the plate. Suggest you scroll back and ready Tony-OH's post about Gausman.

I wish him well, and yes, he will do better in the NL, not because of defense or offense, but because he is out of the AL East, and he also pitches to the pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply
16 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Mathematically speaking, this can't be true, though it might be true if you only factor in true contenders.  

That’s the way the terminology seems to work — it’s geared to where a guy would fit in a pennant contending rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Lol, no one takes you seriously you know, right? Statements like these are so ridiculous it makes any other argument you make invalid.

 You can say you thought he should get more, but to act like he just pulled a Thrift borders on insanity or shows your complete and utter inability to understand the players received.

He got robbed in the Gausman deal.  You can take me seriously or not but it doesn't' change the facts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

Mathematically speaking, this can't be true, though it might be true if you only factor in true contenders.  

You are missing the point. There really is no true difference between a #3 and #4. Basically it's consistency. Honestly the whole #3 vs #4 pitcher is pretty loosely based. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

You are missing the point. There really is no true difference between a #3 and #4. Basically it's consistency. Honestly the whole #3 vs #4 pitcher is pretty loosely based. 

Exactly.  I think it's funny sometimes how overly specific we get on stuff like this...the difference between a #3 and a #4?  Honestly, the difference often times has as much to do with how good your #1 and #2 are or whether one is a LH or RH pitcher.

Really at the end of the day it is sorta like discussing the preference of gazing at women if that is your sort of thing....she's a 7...or she's an 8.  The difference is almost always in the eye of the beholder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2018 at 10:41 AM, atomic said:

He got robbed in the Gausman deal.  You can take me seriously or not but it doesn't' change the facts. 

That’s an opinion.    We’ll see if it becomes a fact.    We won’t know for 5+ years.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...