Jump to content

Why we could be "good again" sooner than many expect


Bradysburns

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bradysburns said:

I realize we're in for a long road ahead. 

It will be years before we compete for the playoffs again. 

However, I suspect we'll be fun to watch -- even GOOD -- sooner than expected. 

Why? Two words: pitching and defense. 

Cobb, Cashner and Bundy will form the top of our rotation next season. There's reason to think they'll all have much improved years. Bundy's older and a year further removed from injury. Cobb is finding his footing in Baltimore. Cashner has mid-rotation stuff, easily. AND... our defense should be markedly improved when the likes of Mullins, Hayes and Diaz are patrolling the outfield. 

We're essentially going to have three center fielders out there. And that should be both unusual, and fun to watch. 

Imagine all those "doubles" from Yankee hitters... magically getting caught, with highlight-reel catches, night after night. 

If we improve our infield defense, which should not be difficult... we could have an elite defense, behind a young but veteran rotation. 

If guys like Dillon Tate and Luis Ortiz can come up and perform... we could be fun to watch as soon as the second half of next year. 

I don't see us winning more than 70 games next year. But I do think the second half could be legitimately enjoyable. 

Agreed? Or do you see multiple years of ugly baseball ahead? 

That's one of the reasons that makes baseball so much fun: there's no way no know how good these guys will be in a year or two. They may not be any good at all, and we'l just have to wait and see. (That's also the reason to look for quantity as well as quantity in trading for younger prospects, and in international free agent signings.) You listen to people with knowledge and talent for assessing players' skills and projecting their value, but they're often wrong. 

I wish I could share your optimism, but I think it would take more than two or three of whatever you're having. While you legitimately, if a bit over-enthusiastically, look forward to our OF defense, there are all kinds of question marks around the offense, pitching (starters and relievers), and infield defense (sure, it will be improved, but an upgrade on what we've got now could still be bad or mediocre). And the offense. We've got a bunch of guys who might produce against major league pitching, but might not.

Watching should be a lot more fun and interesting than it's been to follow this year's predictable losers, but I'm not expecting a lot of wins in the foreseeable future, let alone playoff contention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What makes you think that Bundy will not be traded?    

With the O's trade everyone that is making money approach  I don't see this team contending until 2023.    If that is true Bundy and Givens will be on the block this off season.

The infielder Grenier, Carmona, Encarnacion , Adam Hall will probably not be ready to contend until that time.

Grayson Rodriguez and DL Hall will probably not be established in the rotation and knowledge about the league until 2023.

Orioles.com profile is not sure whether Tate is a starter or a reliever and the same could be said for Hunter Harvey's durability.

#3's, 4's and 5s  Akin,  Oritz may be ready sometime next year to make it to the majors but they have to learn the league which could mean 2020 before they are competitive. 

I think we should not think this process will be a short one.  2023 contention sounds about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wildcard said:

What makes you think that Bundy will not be traded?    

With the O's trade everyone that is making money approach  I don't see this team contending until 2023.    If that is true Bundy and Givens will be on the block this off season.

The infielder Grenier, Carmona, Encarnacion , Adam Hall will probably not be ready to contend until that time.

Grayson Rodriguez and DL Hall will probably not be established in the rotation and knowledge about the league until 2023.

Orioles.com profile is not sure whether Tate is a starter or a reliever and the same could be said for Hunter Harvey's durability.

#3's, 4's and 5s  Akin,  Oritz may be ready sometime next year to make it to the majors but they have to learn the league which could mean 2020 before they are competitive. 

I think we should not think this process will be a short one.  2023 contention sounds about right.

I think we're going to be clawing at our eyes by 2023.  There are a lot of pieces expected to make their debut in 2019 and I would hope they are seasoned by 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 99ct said:

I appreciate the sentiment and would love for it to be true. But pointing to Bundy, Cobb and Cashner, and concluding that we now "have pitching," is a huge mistake, IMO. Those three are decent, but far from exceptional. Further, the chance of all three improving next year is a long-shot, though I admit its a possibility. The real problem is that even then, its only 3/5.

Remember how hard it was to find a fifth starter who wasn't an automatic loss in '16-'17? Now try finding a fourth and fifth starter, while also hoping that Bundy, Cobb and Cashner are good.

In short, the odds are slim.

But we do have a bunch of starters performing very well at Delmarva/Frederick.   And guys considered good prospects like Harvey/Akin.   And we added several starters to the organization through trades.

Honestly, I don't think finding a respectable 4th/5th starter by 2020 will be a problem.   I would be more concerned that even with Bundy and Cobb and Cashner, we might be lacking in top of the rotation arms.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

I think we're going to be clawing at our eyes by 2023.  There are a lot of pieces expected to make their debut in 2019 and I would hope they are seasoned by 2021.

So do you think the O's will keep Bundy or trade him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tx Oriole said:

Well if the team wins 70 games in 2019 that's an improvement. I try to keep a positive outlook. 

If this team wins 70 games in 2019 it will probably be the biggest improevment of any team in MLB.   20 to 25 game pickup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree a quick retool WAS possible two years from now if they had kept Gausman and Schoop, still would have had Bundy, Cobb, Gausman in the rotation.  But now, no way.  I was all for trading Machado, Britton, and Brach, and wish there was a way to trade AJ and find a home for Trumbo, but was not in favor of trading Guasman and Schoop.  Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NedFromYork said:

I agree a quick retool WAS possible two years from now if they had kept Gausman and Schoop, still would have had Bundy, Cobb, Gausman in the rotation.  But now, no way.  I was all for trading Machado, Britton, and Brach, and wish there was a way to trade AJ and find a home for Trumbo, but was not in favor of trading Guasman and Schoop.  Oh well.

You're talking sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, wildcard said:

What makes you think that Bundy will not be traded?    

With the O's trade everyone that is making money approach  I don't see this team contending until 2023.    If that is true Bundy and Givens will be on the block this off season.

The infielder Grenier, Carmona, Encarnacion , Adam Hall will probably not be ready to contend until that time.

Grayson Rodriguez and DL Hall will probably not be established in the rotation and knowledge about the league until 2023.

Orioles.com profile is not sure whether Tate is a starter or a reliever and the same could be said for Hunter Harvey's durability.

#3's, 4's and 5s  Akin,  Oritz may be ready sometime next year to make it to the majors but they have to learn the league which could mean 2020 before they are competitive. 

I think we should not think this process will be a short one.  2023 contention sounds about right.

Why not try to be a bit positive? I will cheer for the team. It may be a while but hang on. It's going to be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...