Jump to content

MLB - Expansion and realignment


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Baseball has problem with younger generations. It is boring. Expanding and therefore diluting the pitching pool would actually be good because it would likely lead to slightly more runs scored. Although with only 2 teams the impact would probably not be significant. 

32 teams would allow a balanced schedule. Get rid of the divisions and expand the wildcard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Also Montreal getting a team would hurt Toronto, which is a good thing in my book since Cito sucks.

Why?  Because they're both in Canada?  The two cities are 335 miles apart, which is about the distance from Baltimore to Charlotte, NC.  I really doubt that the handful of people missing baseball in Montreal are making the road trip to Toronto.   Loria bought a share of the Expos in 1999.  Attendance the year before was under 1 million.  The market was already barren, not that he did anything to change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bird watcher said:

Baseball has problem with younger generations. It is boring. Expanding and therefore diluting the pitching pool would actually be good because it would likely lead to slightly more runs scored. Although with only 2 teams the impact would probably not be significant. 

32 teams would allow a balanced schedule. Get rid of the divisions and expand the wildcard. 

I would also live to see the minor league teams separated from the MLB teams and start implementing relegation. This would stop fans from cheering for their team to lose like many of us are now. 

Pipe dream and will never happen; I know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bird watcher said:

I would also live to see the minor league teams separated from the MLB teams and start implementing relegation. This would stop fans from cheering for their team to lose like many of us are now. 

Pipe dream and will never happen; I know. 

I've never heard of this idea, can you tell me more about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

Why?  Because they're both in Canada?  The two cities are 335 miles apart, which is about the distance from Baltimore to Charlotte, NC.  I really doubt that the handful of people missing baseball in Montreal are making the road trip to Toronto.   Loria bought a share of the Expos in 1999.  Attendance the year before was under 1 million.  The market was already barren, not that he did anything to change that.

Yes.

True it won't effect attendance much but it will TV and merchandise.  Also corporate deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get rid of shifts.  The idea is to hit it to someone who doesn't have to move.  Getting rid of shifts allows for athletic outfielders to make more exciting plays.  Pitch Clock to speed up the game.  I saw this weekend where tennis has a Serve Clock, need it.  An Electronic Strikezone would be nice.  Anything that can be done to reduce all or nothing batters would make the game more exciting.  Anything that can be done to encourage more base stealing would make the game more exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

http://www.masnsports.com/orioles-buzz/2018/09/andrew-stetka-realignment-could-factor-into-how-quickly-os-can-compete.html

I think its just chatter, much like the desire by some to see MLB strip Angelos family of the team and sell it to somebody different.

Baseball isn't healthy enough to expand, IMO.

I agree, but just because we think that, doesn't mean Manfred and the owners do.  If they do realign, I think geography AND market/revenue should be considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NedFromYork said:

Get rid of shifts.  The idea is to hit it to someone who doesn't have to move.  Getting rid of shifts allows for athletic outfielders to make more exciting plays.  Pitch Clock to speed up the game.  I saw this weekend where tennis has a Serve Clock, need it.  An Electronic Strikezone would be nice.  Anything that can be done to reduce all or nothing batters would make the game more exciting.  Anything that can be done to encourage more base stealing would make the game more exciting.

Please elaborate.

Do you mean having outfielders play out of position will increase the difficulty of playing defense?

How about we tie their shoe laces together so they can't run so fast?  That will spark offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bird watcher said:

I would also live to see the minor league teams separated from the MLB teams and start implementing relegation. This would stop fans from cheering for their team to lose like many of us are now. 

Pipe dream and will never happen; I know. 

Without a much broader restructuring of MLB and the minor leagues, relegation in baseball would make things worse.

One of the biggest problems MLB faces, IMO, is the increasing stratification of teams' ability to compete into (roughly) three groups: those with the highest potential revenues, which can afford to buy and retain top talent, those with middling potential revenues, whose ability to compete depends largely on their division placement, and those with the lowest potential revenues, which can only rarely compete for the post-season.

Relegation would further impair the ability of lower-revenue teams to compete for the post-season. The threat of being relegated would have little or no impact on the highest-revenue teams. But a struggling middle-income or any lower-income team would be hampered in its spending (on payroll and everything else) since it would have to factor in the possibility that its revenues will drop through the floor when it, if not this year then maybe in the future, is relegated to some (now-non-existent) league that approximates a AAA league. Free agents would be reluctant to sign with lower-revenue teams since that signing would put them at risk of topping out at that sub-MLB level. A top prospect drafted by, say, the Orioles or Rays or Royals or Padres or Reds or Marlins or A's or Brewers might elect not to sign since, by the time he would be promoted to the big club, it could be playing at some level other than MLB.

Baseball is badly in need of leveling the competitive playing field. Relegation sounds good, but it would do just the opposite.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...