Jump to content

Joseph for the second time calls out the team


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ruzious said:

Rick Dempsey was a post-season star and World Series MVP and had a lifetime OPS+ of 87 vs Caleb's 70.  And Caleb's at 58 this season.      

Rick Dempsey picked a good time to get hot in the WS, the '83 team hit something like .213 as a team in the WS.   I mean, Pat Borders was a WS MVP.  So was Steve Yeager.  Are we really going to play the WS MVP game and then argue for an 87 OPS+?   Just because Caleb is an F doesn't mean that Rick Dempsey's D is amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Rick Dempsey picked a good time to get hot in the WS, the '83 team hit something like .213 as a team in the WS.   I mean, Pat Borders was a WS MVP.  So was Steve Yeager.  Are we really going to play the WS MVP game and then argue for an 87 OPS+?   Just because Caleb is an F doesn't mean that Rick Dempsey's D is amazing.

I'm going to bow out of this conversation and repeat that Caleb Joseph doesn't compare to Rick Dempsey, and I'm not sure how this is even a discussion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Last I checked, it's an indication of performance, and it's hard to have a poor performer being a leader.  Like pretty much every other business, your leaders are going to be top performers

So, Adam Jones has long been considered a leader in the clubhouse. If he tanks, then no one will listen to him because he’s performed poorly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Rick Dempsey picked a good time to get hot in the WS, the '83 team hit something like .213 as a team in the WS.   I mean, Pat Borders was a WS MVP.  So was Steve Yeager.  Are we really going to play the WS MVP game and then argue for an 87 OPS+?   Just because Caleb is an F doesn't mean that Rick Dempsey's D is amazing.

Rick Dempsey had a 25 WAR career, 21 WAR with the O’s.    He wasn’t a star but a solid player.   He wouldn’t have lasted as long as he did if major league teams didn’t think he was pretty good.   And 87 OPS+ probably ranks as average for a catcher in that era.   He’s certainly several cuts above Caleb Joseph.    Has he been dining out on that WS MVP a long time?   Sure.   But he was no doubt a solid contributor to that team and many other winning teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I'm going to bow out of this conversation and repeat that Caleb Joseph doesn't compare to Rick Dempsey, and I'm not sure how this is even a discussion.  

Yeah, you're comparing an 87+ to a 70+.   If we were arguing Chris Hoiles 119+ to Caleb Joseph's 70+ I'd be more inclined to agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Rick Dempsey had a 25 WAR career, 21 WAR with the O’s.    He wasn’t a star but a solid player.   He wouldn’t have lasted as long as he did if major league teams didn’t think he was pretty good.   And 87 OPS+ probably ranks as average for a catcher in that era.   He’s certainly several cuts above Caleb Joseph.    Has he been dining out on that WS MVP a long time?   Sure.   But he was no doubt a solid contributor to that team and many other winning teams.

Thanks, Frobby.  If you extrapolate Caleb's 4.3 career WAR over 24 seasons like Dempsey had, you'd probably wind up somewhere in the same ballpark.  25 WAR over 24 seasons isn't much.  I'm not saying Dempsey was a bad player, I agree with your assessment that he was solid, especially for the time period.

My overriding point is that you don't have to be a WAR God to be a leader.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Thanks, Frobby.  If you extrapolate Caleb's 4.3 career WAR over 24 seasons like Dempsey had, you'd probably wind up somewhere in the same ballpark.  25 WAR over 24 seasons isn't much.  I'm not saying Dempsey was a bad player, I agree with your assessment that he was solid, especially for the time period.

My overriding point is that you don't have to be a WAR God to be a leader.  

As great as Dempsey was behind the plate, there is no doubt, there would be some flames his way, from OH, if he played in today's ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

As great as Dempsey was behind the plate, there is no doubt, there would be some flames his way, from OH, if he played in today's ERA.

Weak hitting scrappy catchers with a lot of grit were cool back in the day.  So were weak hitting middle infielders that hustled.  If advanced stats were as popular back then as they are now, 1985 Orioleshangout.com would be calling for Dempsey's head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Thanks, Frobby.  If you extrapolate Caleb's 4.3 career WAR over 24 seasons like Dempsey had, you'd probably wind up somewhere in the same ballpark.  25 WAR over 24 seasons isn't much.  I'm not saying Dempsey was a bad player, I agree with your assessment that he was solid, especially for the time period.

My overriding point is that you don't have to be a WAR God to be a leader.  

Last point first: I agree.    It does help if you’re at least a decent contributor to the team, and Caleb’s contributions this year are minimal.   But as a veteran who was on some winning teams, I would still expect his words to carry some weight.

Back on Dempsey, I don’t think you can multiply Joseph’s WAR to project him out to 24 years and compare him to Dempsey.    He wasn’t good enough to be in the majors before age 28, and I doubt he’ll be in the majors too many more years.  Dempsey was a much better player, who was worth 11.9 rWAR from ages 28-32, the period in which Joseph has accumulated his 4.3 rWAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

So, Adam Jones has long been considered a leader in the clubhouse. If he tanks, then no one will listen to him because he’s performed poorly?

Huh?  Of course not - he's established himself over many years with the team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Good message, but the messenger has a .572 OPS and has been worth 0.1 rWAR this season.    

Joseph isn't talking about results or OPS, he is talking about attitude and execution. Fine with me if he wants to voice his frustration.

Also fine with me if he is the first to go based on his production. (Honestly if he was a better player, he would have been traded by now).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, you're comparing an 87+ to a 70+.   If we were arguing Chris Hoiles 119+ to Caleb Joseph's 70+ I'd be more inclined to agree.

You're seriously killing me - comparing those 2.  

I'm trying to leave, but they keep pulling me back!  :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Weak hitting scrappy catchers with a lot of grit were cool back in the day.  So were weak hitting middle infielders that hustled.  If advanced stats were as popular back then as they are now, 1985 Orioleshangout.com would be calling for Dempsey's head.

It was pointed out a few times in Wieter's era here, WAR applied to catchers, doesn't really tell the whole story, since the catcher has so much input and involvement in the defense and play of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...