Jump to content

Attendance 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There's some good news hidden in everything.  Derek Jeter, 120-203 record, 811k attendance.  That just warms the heart.

That has to be the feel-good story of 2019.

Possible runner-up is Lew Ford and the Long Island Ducks winning the independent Atlantic League championship last night by beating the Sugar Land Skeeters, 8-4, in the decisive fifth game of their series. (By the way, Ford was followed in the Ducks' batting order by one L.J. Mazzilli, the son of former major leaguer Lee Mazzilli. Something in the back of my mind tells me that Lee Mazzilli had a brief non-playing connection with the Orioles, but I've managed to suppress that memory.) 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Something in the back of my mind tells me that Lee Mazzilli had a brief non-playing connection with the Orioles, but I've managed to suppress that memory.) 

Yeah, it was all Mazzilli's (129-140, .480) fault 2005 went downhill.  In fact, I bet he was the one that injected Palmeiro with the needle from Tejada's little black briefcase.  That's why Peter fired him 4 days after Palmeiro got his 10 game suspension.   Yeah, the Orioles had hit a real rough patch, going 3-16 at the end of Mazz' tenure.  Perlozzo had a 5-15 run which began about 2 weeks later (8/17-9/9), followed by a 2-13 skid (9/14-19).

Angelos never liked Mazzilli, but he left it up to Beatagan to pick their man.   Mazzilli didn't get to pick his own coaches, however.  In fact, one of his coaches, Rick Dempsey, made it a point to meet with Angelos directly to bad mouth his manager.  Poor back-stabbing Rick was gunning for the manager's job himself.  Sucked to be him.  Big Pete wanted Perlozzo all along, and Sam rewarded him with a 122-167 (.427) mark across three seasons, even after bringing his pal Leo Mazzone in as pitching coach.  Yep, we went from Lee Mazz as manager to Leo Mazz as PC.   

Peter sure knew his baseball though.  He shrewdly saddled Mazzilli with Sammy Sosa in 2005, acquired in a trade from his pal Sweater Vest Andy's Cubs.  Sosa proceeded to post an OPS+ of 78 and a rWAR of -0.4 before missing the last month of the season with toe jam football.  Didn't know what Sammy used to shoot, but it wasn't coca cola.

As a footnote, Mazzilli's firing was the one time an OH "insider" came through with a scoop, and it was Wild Bill, IIRC.   It also marks the first time, Peter paid for two managers at the same time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much everybody who tries to assess the direction of MLB or an MLB  team's financial health focuses on the number of tickets sold. The more relevant data, in my opinion are gate receipts -- the revenues received from ticket buyers.

When they sell tickets to their games, MLB presumably are trying to maximize their revenues -- that is, their gate receipts. If a team has raised its ticket prices over last year by 10 percent, it might feel pretty good about the financial impact of a 2 percent decline in its home attendance. And it's not the case that each ticket sold generates the same revenue; to understand the season-to-season direction of a team's gate receipts, you need to know the mix of prices of the tickets sold in each of those years, not just the number of tickets sold and overall ticket prices for each year.

You can argue that teams should not be focused solely on revenues from the tickets it sells, since it would be better for building the game's future for teams to sell more tickets at lower prices, bringing more fans out to games, even if that would result in lower gate receipts. But most of MLB's owners have made it clear that what they're trying to do, over a limited time period if not in each season, is to maximize profits and win games, with little or no regard to building future interest in baseball (at least where there's some loss of revenue or some significant cost attached to the latter).

Complete, up-to-date and and reliable data on tickets sold by each team are always just a click away. Gate receipts, on the other hand, are available for the most part only in the Forbes numbers that are reported months after the season is over (and, while I think those numbers are pretty reliable, that's not entirely certain). As a result, we tend to look only to the former data point for each team, but that's probably not the most important fact from the point of view of a team owner.  

When the Commissioner or a team owner talks about the health of the game, I try to keep in mind that they have a lot more information than I do, and that flat attendance or a small attendance decline may look different to them from what it looks like to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Pretty much everybody who tries to assess the direction of MLB or an MLB  team's financial health focuses on the number of tickets sold. The more relevant data, in my opinion are gate receipts -- the revenues received from ticket buyers.

When they sell tickets to their games, MLB presumably are trying to maximize their revenues -- that is, their gate receipts. If a team has raised its ticket prices over last year by 10 percent, it might feel pretty good about the financial impact of a 2 percent decline in its home attendance. And it's not the case that each ticket sold generates the same revenue; to understand the season-to-season direction of a team's gate receipts, you need to know the mix of prices of the tickets sold in each of those years, not just the number of tickets sold and overall ticket prices for each year.

You can argue that teams should not be focused solely on revenues from the tickets it sells, since it would be better for building the game's future for teams to sell more tickets at lower prices, bringing more fans out to games, even if that would result in lower gate receipts. But most of MLB's owners have made it clear that what they're trying to do, over a limited time period if not in each season, is to maximize profits and win games, with little or no regard to building future interest in baseball (at least where there's some loss of revenue or some significant cost attached to the latter).

Complete, up-to-date and and reliable data on tickets sold by each team are always just a click away. Gate receipts, on the other hand, are available for the most part only in the Forbes numbers that are reported months after the season is over (and, while I think those numbers are pretty reliable, that's not entirely certain). As a result, we tend to look only to the former data point for each team, but that's probably not the most important fact from the point of view of a team owner.  

When the Commissioner or a team owner talks about the health of the game, I try to keep in mind that they have a lot more information than I do, and that flat attendance or a small attendance decline may look different to them from what it looks like to me. 

I think both are important.   Gate receipts are an important source of revenue, but by no means the biggest source of revenue these days.  Attendance tells you something about overall fan interest in the game that gate receipts don't necessarily tell you.   I do suspect that the overall decline in MLB attendance is driven significantly by the aging of the fan base.   Older fans are dying or are becoming less able to travel to games, and younger fans are not replacing them fast enough.    The other causes arguably are (1) the slowing pace of games, and/or (2) the increasing number of teams who, like the Orioles, are not really trying to play respectable baseball while they rebuild.    A league full of teams who are winning between, say, 60 and 102 games, with a lot of teams in the 75-87 win range, will draw better than a league full of teams who are winning between 54 and 108 games with only a couple of teams in the middle (and those teams are further behind the top teams than they'd be in a more balanced league).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think both are important.   Gate receipts are an important source of revenue, but by no means the biggest source of revenue these days.  Attendance tells you something about overall fan interest in the game that gate receipts don't necessarily tell you.   I do suspect that the overall decline in MLB attendance is driven significantly by the aging of the fan base.   Older fans are dying or are becoming less able to travel to games, and younger fans are not replacing them fast enough.    The other causes arguably are (1) the slowing pace of games, and/or (2) the increasing number of teams who, like the Orioles, are not really trying to play respectable baseball while they rebuild.    A league full of teams who are winning between, say, 60 and 102 games, with a lot of teams in the 75-87 win range, will draw better than a league full of teams who are winning between 54 and 108 games with only a couple of teams in the middle (and those teams are further behind the top teams than they'd be in a more balanced league).

Among the other things I would like to know are (a) how many tickets sold by each team aren't used, and (b) how many tickets sold by each team are bought by companies and service firms, as opposed to people.

You're right -- I think -- about the effect on competition and attendance of a lot of teams rebuilding in an extreme way. Those teams, in effect, have decided not to maximize gate receipts or try to sell as many tickets as they can this year. It's hard to figure out what to make of those teams' diminished attendance. And it remains an open question whether, if the rebuild succeeds, how fast and how much attendance and gate receipts will bounce back -- especially if the rebuilt team performs well, but not as spectacularly well as Houston, as I would expect would be the case in the AL East, NL Central or AL West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

The other causes arguably are (1) the slowing pace of games, and/or (2) the increasing number of teams who, like the Orioles, are not really trying to play respectable baseball while they rebuild.  

I'm sure those are important.  But what if a key reason is that younger people just aren't that into baseball?  Sometimes selling people born after 1995 on baseball feels like trying to get the same crowd into buying Buicks and Harleys.  Years ago the three most popular sports in America were horse racing, boxing, and baseball.  I'd rather clean grout than watch horse racing and boxing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen a resurgence of youth rec ball in my area of Carroll county.  For years there were no league games at our local school fields.  This spring there was and now I'm seeing Fall ball games on Sunday afternoons.  So, there's hope.  Also, as families turn away from football due to brain injuries and the like, there's still hope that parents may steer their kids (boys and girls) toward baseball - among other activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm sure those are important.  But what if a key reason is that younger people just aren't that into baseball?  Sometimes selling people born after 1995 on baseball feels like trying to get the same crowd into buying Buicks and Harleys.  Years ago the three most popular sports in America were horse racing, boxing, and baseball.  I'd rather clean grout than watch horse racing and boxing.

I personally spend less time watching sports now than at almost any time in my life. Busy life, lots of things to do for entertainment, and although I occasionally watch a college football game on Saturday in general I have better things to do with my time. I know more and more of my friends, even die hard baseball fans, actually watch less sports in general now and baseball specifically. They still follow their teams and watch some, but watch way less than they did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ohfan67 said:

I personally spend less time watching sports now than at almost any time in my life. Busy life, lots of things to do for entertainment, and although I occasionally watch a college football game on Saturday in general I have better things to do with my time. I know more and more of my friends, even die hard baseball fans, actually watch less sports in general now and baseball specifically. They still follow their teams and watch some, but watch way less than they did. 

I probably watch almost as much sports as ever.  But it's mostly U13 and U12 soccer instead of the Orioles, DC United, and Virginia Tech.  Five or six days a week I have either Dad or coaching duties with my kids' games.

But it's true that when I was 25 I tried to watch every inning I could, and at one point had a run of about two years where I never missed being in attendance at a Tech football game, home, away or bowl.  At 48 it seems excessive and wasteful to spend 650 hours a year watching the Orioles.  You only get so much time on Earth, it doesn't all have to be about Rich Amaral.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...