Jump to content

Can Means become the Orioles’ version of Kuechel?


Obando

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

I'm not confident what Means is doing is sustainable.  If he finishes the season well I wonder what returns he could get in a winter trade.

He has shown to be a pitcher who can improve.  I would like to see what he can do on his breaking pitches.

Other than K rate being low I dont know that I see anything that indicates he is going to become a pumpkin.

He has a decent GB rate (did not get a single one yesterday though), and exactly the level of sustainable HR/FB (10%) you would hope out of someone who is putching in OPACY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

I'm not confident what Means is doing is sustainable.  If he finishes the season well I wonder what returns he could get in a winter trade.

I don’t think anyone looks at Means as an ace and few look at him long term is a TOR. Even though he has put up TOR numbers so far. So I don’t think you are going to get a TOR return in a trade.

I like him as a mid-rotation piece and I see no reason to try to trade him anytime soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2019 at 9:00 AM, 25 Nuggets said:

 

I'm not confident what Means is doing is sustainable. If he finishes the season well, I wonder what returns he could get in a winter trade.

 

 

 

On 7/26/2019 at 10:05 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

 

What would you trade for a pitcher who you believe has an unsustainable path to success ???

 

 

 

49 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

 

Fair point; in order for a trade to be successful, the other GM would have to disagree with my opinion.

 

o

 

This is mildly reminiscent from years back, when somebody asserted that Matt Wieters was highly overrated, and an average at best catcher ........ and then proposed that we trade him for a top-of-the-rotation starter. 

 

o

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

This is mildly reminiscent from years back, when somebody asserted that Matt Wieters was highly overrated, and an average at best catcher ........ and then proposed that we trade him for a top-of-the-rotation starter.

Essentially all trades discussed online involve at least a few suggestions of "We know he's about to tank, but clearly the 29 other GMs of MLB teams don't.  So we need to jump now, before they read this thread."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Essentially all trades discussed online involve at least a few suggestions of "We know he's about to tank, but clearly the 29 other GMs of MLB teams don't.  So we need to jump now, before they read this thread."

Might be a viable strategy if Smoke was still a GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, OFFNY said:

This is mildly reminiscent from years back, when somebody asserted that Matt Wieters was highly overrated, and an average at best catcher ........ and then proposed that we trade him for a top-of-the-rotation starter. o

Now hold on, I don't want people to think I'd ask for an established major league star here.  I'd want five 17 year old shortstops from Venezuela.  Specifically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

This is mildly reminiscent from years back, when somebody asserted that Matt Wieters was highly overrated, and an average at best catcher ........ and then proposed that we trade him for a top-of-the-rotation starter. 

 

o

 

 

4 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

 

Now hold on, I don't want people to think I'd ask for an established Major League star here. I'd want five 17 year-old shortstops from Venezuela ........ specifically.

 

o

 

That's why I said mildly reminiscent ........ it touches on the same subject, but with different variables. 

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

o

 

This was Means' 1st start after a brief stint on the IL. 

He had bad outings in 2 out of his 3 previous starts prior to that minor injury.

He started well tonight, then was knocked around in the 4th inning.

 

 

11 OUTS: )5 Strikeouts, 3 Flyouts, 2 Foulouts, 1 Popout

 

JOHN ALAN MEANS )))))) (vs. YANKEES, 8/07)

IP:ll3.67

H:llll 5 )l (1 Home Run, 2 Doubles, 2 Singles)   

R:lllll 4

BB:ll

SO:ll5

Pitches: )l 80(53 )Strikes, )27 )Balls) 

2019 ERA: ))3.36  ))  101.67 IP  (38 ER) 

2019 WHIP: ))1.161  ))  101.67 IP  (118 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )).234 ) (90 for 385) 

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*************************

11 ll(81 llStrikes, lll31 lllBalls)

23 ll(15 llStrikes, lll81 lllBalls)

14 ll(91 llStrikes, lll51 lllBalls)

32 ll(21 llStrikes, ll11 llllBalls) ) *

 

* )) Means recorded 2 outs before departing in the 4th inning.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article on Means' change-up
 

Quote

The easiest way to see the link between how a player thinks about a pitch and the resulting movement is when the cue is mechanical. John Means in Baltimore had a decent fastball, but his changeup was only about 5 or 6 miles per hour slower than his fastball, and it didn’t have much movement. He talked with his pitching coordinator Chris Holt, who gave him a tiny bit of advice that stuck.

“How I was taught it was to throw it like my fastball, and got behind it, and it was too hard,” Means said. “It looked like my fastball, but it was too close to my fastball. Holt told me to think about pronating more.”

Pronating is basically a move of your wrist and hand toward the thumb near the end of release. Everyone naturally pronates when they throw, possibly as a result of releasing the ball off the dominant fingers, but by focusing on pronating, Means ended up deadening the pitch and removing velocity. Now only six changeups have a bigger velocity gap than Means’ does.

It’s amazing that one little piece of advice could do that, but Means insists there weren’t that many drills, that this was really all there was to it.

“Nolan Ryan did a drill where he would take a circle and throw it, a drill where he’d throw the circle at the catcher without a ball,” Means acknowleged, but he didn’t do many of those drills. “Holt told me that in the spring, and I made a mental of note of it, and we opened in New York, and I threw one, and it did something different, and the hitter took a bad swing. Oh, I think I’ll try that again. So I threw it like 75 percent of the time in my first outing.”

So here was the first change that came with the new thought process, a change that altered Means’ life.

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m not down on Means and neither should anyone. 2 starts off the IL against the hottest team in MLB. Means has the makeup to learn from this. His next start is looking like KC. I’ll go out on a limb and say he’ll be his old self. 

I am not down on him but if he is still hurt he needs to be shut down. Live to fight another day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...