Jump to content

MLB Broadcast Audience Rankings?


Migrant Redbird

Recommended Posts

During last night's Cardinals-Marlins broadcast, while discussing the abysmal attendance at Marlins games, the Fox announcers said that the Marlins ranked 7th in broadcast ratings. Now they weren't explicit, but I assume that was TV broadcasts and referred to the size of the TV audience (as opposed to audience share).

What I found astounding is that they said the Cardinals were second, behind the Mariners! Unless the Mariners have a huge TV audience in Japan that's being counted in the ratings, I find it difficult to believe they're anywhere near the top ten overall. I would also be surprised to learn that the Cardinals audience exceeds that of the Yankees and Red Sox on YES and NESN.

Does anyone know where the rankings are that the Fox broadcasters were citing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure, but it doesn't jive with numbers discussed here a month ago or so RE: the Nats.

The biggest average households numbers, according to the story (which is based on Nielsen Media Research numbers) watch the Yankees (325,000), Red Sox (233,000) and Mets (204,000). The highest average ratings, according to the story, are found in Boston (9.75), St. Louis (8.04) and Minnesota (6.92).

More to the point, the lowest average household numbers, aside from the Nats, watch the Royals (28,000), Orioles (33,000) and Pirates (34,000). To repeat, the Nationals' number was 9,000, less than a third of the viewership in next-to-last Kansas City. The lowest average ratings, aside from the Nats, are found watching the Angels (1.24), Rangers (1.49) and Dodgers (1.57). To repeat, the Nationals' number was 0.39.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is some more numbers, from about the same time. Reading that real quick perhaps the Mariners number they are using is from last year? Or, more likely, just another example of team broadcasters talking without really knowing what they are saying.

Conversely, Liberty Sports-owned FSN Northwest endured the biggest first-half Nielsen decline. The disappointing Mariners, tied with the San Diego Padres for the second worst record in the game at 37-58 (the Nationals are 36-60), averaged a 4.73 mark in the Seattle DMA for the regional, a 43% drop from an 8.32 through the similar stage last season.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there goes the idea that MASN is going to help the Orioles compete with the Yankees and the Red Sox anytime soon.

The Yankees and the Red Sox average TV audience numbers dwarf the combined Orioles and Nationals numbers. The Nats are less than one-third of next to last Kansas City? You've got to be kidding me. The good news is that the National TV numbers have got to get better; they can't get much worse. And the Orioles aren't exactly keeping the fans glued to the tubes either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is some more numbers, from about the same time. Reading that real quick perhaps the Mariners number they are using is from last year? Or, more likely, just another example of team broadcasters talking without really knowing what they are saying.

My suspicion is that somehow their source factored in Japanese households watching the Mariners, which wouldn't be part of any Neilson ratings. However, that still doesn't explain the ranking of the Cardinals audience above those of the Yankees and Red Sox. The Yankees and Red Sox might have a minuscule foreign audience; I doubt if the Cardinals do.

I'm also a little skeptical that the Yankees and Red Sox audiences are that much larger than those of the Orioles and Nats. Bigger, yes. Orders of magnitude larger -- I doubt it -- even when factoring in all the Fox Games of the Week and the ESPN Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday night games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • With a previous post in this thread I highlighted a selection of notable or memorable comps for our current Orioles. Now I wonder what it would look like to compare our best roster (from that selected list, in order of WAR) with the corresponding squad of not-all-stars.   Without further ado, here's our team alongside its historic counterparts: LF    Norby        Eugenio Suarez CF    Mullins        Kevin Kiermaier RF    Cowser        Ken Singleton 1B    Mayo        Bill Melton 2B    Holliday    Arky Vaughan SS    Ortiz        Jose Pagan 3B    Henderson    Bill Madlock C    Ruthschman    Ted Simmons DH    Westburg    Robby Thompson     Bench    Mateo        Greg Gagne     SP1    Bradish        Justin Verlander SP2    Kremer        Johnny Cueto SP3    Rodriguez    Jose Berrios SP4    Povich        Jarrod Washburn     SP5    Irvin        Scott McGregor RP1    Pham        Jeff Samardzija RP2    McDermott    Steve Renko RP3    Vespi        Graeme Lloyd RP4    Baker        Matt Albers Closer    Bautista    Trevor Hoffman Oddly enough, it's the starting rotation that appears the strength of our team of doppelgangers.
    • Regarding Cooper, he was a fantastic pitching coach for a long time, but the game simply passed him by.  Near the end of his tenure, after a tough season Giolito actually went and worked with Ethan Katz (our current pitching coach and his former HS pitching coach) and he came back new and improved.  Katz also got a ton of credit for developing Cease and getting Rodon to finally tap into his potential. A year ago I would have been high on Katz, but last year was such a disaster that I’m not sure what to think.  It’s clear he’s got a much more modern take on pitching than Cooper, but I also think the org in general is so behind the times when it comes analytics & biometrics that there is only so much he can do.  We don’t have a single voice driving an org wide pitching philosophy (which is evident in our PD system) or much of a pitching lab to get the most out of guys.  Hopefully that will change for the better with the addition of Brian Bannister. All that being said, I don’t believe for a second we get all we can out of our guys.  Katz obviously helped Giolito, Cease, & Rodon improve but these were all elite prospects acquired from other orgs.  We still struggle to unlock the next tier of guys, although I blame that on broader organizational issues than purely Katz.
    • I love this.  Most fans that go to the game live within 45 minutes of the ballpark I would suspect.  The good thing is you can get home by 10:00 most evenings.  
    • I selfishly don't like it, I'm a displaced fan in the central time zone.  5:30 weeknight start times are rough for me, the games are usually over before I get home from the office.  But they should make decisions based on the people who might actually go to the games. 
    • That's something that can only be determined in hindsight.  Lots of options and lots of flexibility this offseason to really set the team up for the next 2-3 years.  I'm very curious to see how it plays out.  Checking my crystal ball, I don't see Aroldis Chapman anywhere on the program
    • I agree and I don't want him on the team.  But I'm not sure this specific moment is more critical than say, when he picked Gunnar Henderson in the second round.
    • Perhaps he looked and doesn’t have the dough to spend or wants to part with the asking price for Cease or 1 year of the other guys rumored available. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...