Jump to content

The Most Hyped Orioles Prospect...


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

One thing I remember vividly about McDonald is that the Orioles took away his out pitch(forkball) straight out of the gate. They thought he could prolong his career by not throwing it. Which always brings me to the question. Is it better to burn out or fade away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, OsEatAlEast said:

One thing I remember vividly about McDonald is that the Orioles took away his out pitch(forkball) straight out of the gate. They thought he could prolong his career by not throwing it. Which always brings me to the question. Is it better to burn out or fade away?

In 1910 it was "only a fool uses his best stuff except when he really needs it, because you have to go nine every 3-4 days. Or more."

Today it's "use your best stuff all the time, or you're going to get the crap knocked out of you.  But we'll yank you after five innings, and you only pitch once every five or six days."

Overall I'm not sure there's a lot of difference in how long a pitcher lasts.

Or... on smaller time scales Palmer vs Mussina.  Four-man rotation and some high-pitch games and high-inning seasons, vs. never topping 250 innings in a five-man and more pitch counts.  Palmer threw a few more career innings, but Mussina had three more seasons of 150+ innings.  Mussina was never really injured, Palmer missed part or all of four years.  And they had almost identical career W/L records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

In 1910 it was "only a fool uses his best stuff except when he really needs it, because you have to go nine every 3-4 days. Or more."

Today it's "use your best stuff all the time, or you're going to get the crap knocked out of you.  But we'll yank you after five innings, and you only pitch once every five or six days."

Overall I'm not sure there's a lot of difference in how long a pitcher lasts.

Or... on smaller time scales Palmer vs Mussina.  Four-man rotation and some high-pitch games and high-inning seasons, vs. never topping 250 innings in a five-man and more pitch counts.  Palmer threw a few more career innings, but Mussina had three more seasons of 150+ innings.  Mussina was never really injured, Palmer missed part or all of four years.  And they had almost identical career W/L records.

We've had this talk before.  Wins and losses aren't the best criteria to use when evaluating pitchers.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, McDonald's 1993 season looks like a Cy Young Award type year! He didn't even get any votes...

220.1 IP, 3.39 ERA, 171 Ks, 7 CG, 0.7 HR/9

Look at those same stats from the guy who won it that year, Jack McDowell.  Not that different.  Guess they really valued wins.

256.2 IP, 3.37 ERA, 158 Ks, 10 CG, 0.7 HR/9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Man, McDonald's 1993 season looks like a Cy Young Award type year! He didn't even get any votes...

220.1 IP, 3.39 ERA, 171 Ks, 7 CG, 0.7 HR/9

Look at those same stats from the guy who won it that year, Jack McDowell.  Not that different.  Guess they really valued wins.

256.2 IP, 3.37 ERA, 158 Ks, 10 CG, 0.7 HR/9

 

Look at those complete games! 17 combined.  Only two AL guys had as many as three in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, scOtt said:

I was going to mention Hammond too. I mean, he had a fine ML career, for us and others too. But never reached the hype he was supposed to be.

Hammonds was supposed to hit .300 with 20+ home run power and steal some bases. Never got to that level, but he was decent when healthy and that was the major issue for his entire career.

Hammonds only played more than 120 games in a season three times with a high of 128 games played in 2002.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

Man, McDonald's 1993 season looks like a Cy Young Award type year! He didn't even get any votes...

220.1 IP, 3.39 ERA, 171 Ks, 7 CG, 0.7 HR/9

Look at those same stats from the guy who won it that year, Jack McDowell.  Not that different.  Guess they really valued wins.

256.2 IP, 3.37 ERA, 158 Ks, 10 CG, 0.7 HR/9

 

McDonalds's ERA going into the last game of the season was 3.09. That would have been good enough to finish 4th in the AL in 1993. Johnny Oates gave Ben a chance to rest, but he wanted to start and move his ERA ranking up to 2nd or 3rd. Instead he finished out of the top 10 in ERA leaders after giving up 8 earned runs in 1 & 2/3 innings pitched. 

Kevin Appier who led the AL with an 2.56 ERA and in pitching WAR with 9.3, would have easily won the Cy Young in today's world of advanced analytics. McDowell only put up a 4.4 WAR in comparison. Appier got penalized for only winning 18 games in 1993.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, orpheus100 said:

Ben McDonald was still good

Wieters was a tragedy

Tragedy is way too strong. I mean, he was hyped on the cover of SI as the Swith-Hitting Jesus. Before he even played an inning of pro ball. He had/has another fine career. And when it was close and late, and Matt was coming to bat, you felt good! ROCKET arm and the fastest footwork I've ever seen.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scOtt said:

Tragedy is way too strong. I mean, he was hyped on the cover of SI as the Swith-Hitting Jesus. Before he even played an inning of pro ball. He had/has another fine career. And when it was close and late, and Matt was coming to bat, you felt good! ROCKET arm and the fastest footwork I've ever seen.

The hype for Matt didn't kick into high gear until he was playing in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

McDonalds's ERA going into the last game of the season was 3.09. That would have been good enough to finish 4th in the AL in 1993. Johnny Oates gave Ben a chance to rest, but he wanted to start and move his ERA ranking up to 2nd or 3rd. Instead he finished out of the top 10 in ERA leaders after giving up 8 earned runs in 1 & 2/3 innings pitched. 

Kevin Appier who led the AL with an 2.56 ERA and in pitching WAR with 9.3, would have easily won the Cy Young in today's world of advanced analytics. McDowell only put up a 4.4 WAR in comparison. Appier got penalized for only winning 18 games in 1993.

Lol imagine putting up a 9.3 WAR as a starting pitcher and leading the AL with a 2.53 ERA and not winning the Cy Young...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Matt Weiters' final few (pricey and injury-riddled) years in Baltimore hurt his legacy here.  It definitely distracts from how well he did in his first few years:

2009-2012=

  • 13.3 WAR
  • 2,031 PA  
  • 2 Gold Gloves, 2 All Star Selections
  • Made about $1.7 Million over those 4 years

2013-2016=

  • 4.9 WAR
  • 1,437 PA
  • 0 Gold Gloves, 2 All Star Selections (one in a season which he played only 26 games)
  • Made about $37.3 Million over those 4 years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • You just can’t win with an offense this bad. It was an overreaction a month ago when they were getting called embarrassing or pathetic after a bad game. It legitimately might be an understatement at this point.  They have scored 4 runs or less in 19 out of their last 24 games (and 11 of their last 12 games) against teams that aren’t the Rockies or the White Sox. In those 19 games, they have scored 44 total runs (2.32 per game). In two of those games, they scored exactly 5 runs. In another, they scored 10 runs and lost. In another, they had 2 runs going into the 8th. Again, anyone complaining about this offense is underselling it at this point. In total, they have 80 runs in those 24 games (3.33 per game). In their last 8 games overall (including the White Sox), they have scored 15 runs. This offense is completely broken.
    • This team does not hit the fastball well, that's not good.
    • Plenty of teams limp into the playoffs and then make a deep run. This team has enough talent to do it, I just want to see Mayo and Kjerstad finally given a shot to play every day (put Kjerstad in RF, Santander at 1B, Mayo the full time DH), and move away from struggling/low ceiling vets like O'Hearn, Eloy, Rivera, and Slater.  Mayo and Kjerstad playing regularly and Westburg making it back for the playoffs could transform the lineup. I think Hyde is a terrible manager who can't write out a good lineup to save his life, but this offense has been so bad for so long that I think even he's capable of making those changes.  If Webb, Coloumbe, and Grayson can all make it back healthy, they'll also make a difference. 
    • Another Hyde thread 🙄
    • How am I scapegoating him? He hasn't played well for a very long time. I'm just saying give Mayo a legit shot.
    • Am looking forward to the season being over.  Yankees are taking full advantage of the O’s ineptitude - as they should.   Team is so inept offensively and does not seem fixable.  Bad combo of too many players still trying to figure things out. Have no idea what to expect over the next 2 weeks,  but currently they are unwatchable and an overall joyless bunch.   Need new dugout leadership that can help this team unlock its potential,  Hyde is no longer the answer and I think he knows it. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...