Jump to content

Fangraphs: Scoring from First


weams

Recommended Posts

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-final-play-of-last-nights-braves-game/

Quote

With two outs in the bottom of the ninth inning of last night’s game between the Braves and Phillies, the visiting Phillies were holding on to a two-run lead. Dansby Swanson stood on first base with Adeiny Hechavarría on second. Freddie Freeman was facing off against new Phillies acquisition Brandon Workman. In terms of compelling endings, this is pretty close to what you hope for. One of the better hitters in the game had a chance to hit a walk-off home run to end the game, while making an out would mean victory for the other side. Freeman did get a hit, pushing a double into the gap, but the game ended when Swanson was thrown out at home trying to score the tying run.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Oriole1940 said:

Another example of taking the once greatest game in the world, for its simplicity, as well as other things, and making it so complicated that a team of lawyers would argue endlessly about it, then kick it upstairs to the Supreme Court.

So... in your perfect world there wouldn't be exciting bang-bang plays at the plate to end the game?  I guess I'm missing something here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think they are bemoaning the fact that folks are doing more than being inspired by the beauty of game.

Whelp, he's right.  Them whippersnappers and their book learnin' have ruined it all.  It was best when scientific baseball meant a lot of bunts and hitting-and-running six times a game.  Not, you know, actual science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Whelp, he's right.  Them whippersnappers and their book learnin' have ruined it all.  It was best when scientific baseball meant a lot of bunts and hitting-and-running six times a game.  Not, you know, actual science.

Don't call me a whelp.  I'm like a year younger than you and significantly larger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s the part that made sense to me:

“If Swanson stays on third, the Braves have about a one-in-four shot at winning the game as they still need another hit — or a wild pitch or an error — to score a run and tie the game. If Swanson makes it home safely and Freeman ends up standing on third base as the potential winning run, the Braves have a 62.7% chance of winning the game. If Swanson decides to try to make it home, he risks losing 24.2% in win expectancy should he make an out, versus gaining 38.5% in win expectancy if he is safe. That means Swanson should try for home if he believes he has a 39% chance of being safe.“

In his career, Swanson has tried to score from 1st on a double 19 times, and been thrown out once — and it happened to be in this game.   As the article said: “Swanson’s decision was a good one, despite the result.“

In MLB this year, runners have tried to score from 1st on a double 191 times, and have been thrown out 11.    That’s a 94% success rate.   But they only go for it 43% of the time.   So obviously, runners usually only try for home if they are pretty sure they’re going to make it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

That's like ignoring your A1C numbers because why complicate eating a Twinkie?

If you're going to ignore the diabeetus you might as well get your money's worth.  Like some cherry pie and a big ol' scoop of ice cream.  And some coffee.

And... the thread has turned into anti-sabermetrics as a quick descent into a diabetic coma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If you're going to ignore the diabeetus you might as well get your money's worth.  Like some cherry pie and a big ol' scoop of ice cream.  And some coffee.

And... the thread has turned into anti-sabermetrics as a quick descent into a diabetic coma.

What's wrong with coffee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Very weak.  OTOH, there's still a possibility that Jackson Merrill won't win in the NL.  Who didn't want Cowser to have had that rookie season?
    • Who’d a thunk it? There’s a chance? Almost like it’s a long season. Now if only that Mayo guy would do something.
    • Jeez, it really was a welcome game tonight.  I had a good buzz going...   Now I have to factor in your chronic angst.  Thanks man.
    • If we enter the Yankees series down by three games, we have a mathematical chance. However, we are going to have to intentionally walk Judge and Soto every single AB. The athletics did us no favors tonight.  Still four games out..
    • I know. I'm a hand wringer and a whiner when it comes to this team. I sometimes annoy myself with all this baseball nonsense. But really deep down,I'm still the 8 year old who lived and died with every Oriole game. Still. Im that kid. So when this team was really horrible like for most of the second half, it almost made me nauseous just to watch them lose in all kinds of ways. Then all those injuries in a wave. I really felt they weren't going to make the postseason at all. But baseball is a crazy game, and a light switch can be turned on in an instant. Maybe that Santander walk off HR on Thursday threw a switch. Because Friday night, this was a different team. They still strike out a lot, and Burnes was brilliant, but I feel maybe something is moving. Seeing Coluombe come in and strike two batters out, and Webb, not as good, but good enough with a big lead...and to see Cowser and McCann blast two, and Tony again with a HR...It got my juices flowing. Look, maybe they wont play well this weekend, maybe they will. And then the dreaded Yankees might break our hearts next week.But why think that way now.?Urias is coming, then Westburg, then maybe Mounty, and even possibly Grayson at the end . If we can somehow put the pieces together and get our mojo back, and have the players contribute, we maybe, just maybe, might have a little ray of hope.I still think this roster is talented when all our pieces are together, and as good as anyone when we are playing well. So, I'm not asking for a miracle. I'm just asking for a chance to see this team with most of the pieces together again, and compete.Maybe it's even a long shot, but I am still that 8 year old living and dying for a chance to see my boys make me proud. And these are my boys.
    • Velocity was 1.5-2mph down across the board. Movement was good, especially the sweeper. The fastballs worry me at that velocity though... not sure he should be immediately high leverage in the way he used to be.
    • Nicely done. Lol. Yes I remember that with Minnesota. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...