Jump to content

What will the O's 2021 draft be like?


oriolediehard

Recommended Posts

Due to COVID 19 I am asking will the O 's draft / all other MLB teams draft order be the same as the regular draft? Also it seems the O's got cheated when they had the number 2 pick and only got 6 picks when there is usually 40 picks. Too many bad teams worse than the O's this year for them to get a good pick.  What do you all think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The '21 draft order will be set by the Commissioner's office.  The following article hints that there is belief in front offices that the order will be set based upon some combination of 2019 and 2020 results.  The order could simply be based on 2020 results or the article suggests additional calculations -- either the average winning % of the 2019 and 2020 results or the cumulative winning % of 2019 and 2020 results.  It could be something else.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/its-unclear-how-mlb-will-set-2021-draft-order-heres-why-that-matters-a-lot-for-the-red-sox/?ocid=uxbndlbing

Any inclusion of the 2019 results would benefit the Os since we did so poorly in 2019.  I think we will be among the worst five to 10 teams when this season ends.  It may be reasonable to hope we receive a top five pick in 2021 if 2019 results are included.

Regarding the draft itself, there is also talk that it will take place later in the 2021 summer.  Given how little baseball was played in the 2019-2020 college and HS seasons, it may be very difficult to evaluate players the breadth of players in HS and college since there hasn't been quality evaluation in two seasons - in the case of HSers, since their sophomore years - assuming HS and college baseball is played in 2021.

It will make for an interesting draft - though if the '21 HS and college seasons are played, there would be more recent evaluation than existed for this past 2020 draft - and draft order.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hoosiers said:

The '21 draft order will be set by the Commissioner's office.  The following article hints that there is belief in front offices that the order will be set based upon some combination of 2019 and 2020 results.  The order could simply be based on 2020 results or the article suggests additional calculations -- either the average winning % of the 2019 and 2020 results or the cumulative winning % of 2019 and 2020 results.  It could be something else.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/its-unclear-how-mlb-will-set-2021-draft-order-heres-why-that-matters-a-lot-for-the-red-sox/?ocid=uxbndlbing

Any inclusion of the 2019 results would benefit the Os since we did so poorly in 2019.  I think we will be among the worst five to 10 teams when this season ends.  It may be reasonable to hope we receive a top five pick in 2021 if 2019 results are included.

Regarding the draft itself, there is also talk that it will take place later in the 2021 summer.  Given how little baseball was played in the 2019-2020 college and HS seasons, it may be very difficult to evaluate players the breadth of players in HS and college since there hasn't been quality evaluation in two seasons - in the case of HSers, since their sophomore years - assuming HS and college baseball is played in 2021.

It will make for an interesting draft - though if the '21 HS and college seasons are played, there would be more recent evaluation than existed for this past 2020 draft - and draft order.

Good news for us ...as of right now there are 9 teams with less wins including the Sox, Gnats, and Angels

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Good news for us ...as of right now there are 9 teams with less wins including the Sox, Gnats, and Angels

Also good news... we're 4-12 in our last 16.  They're playing how we thought they would the whole season.  If they take their .250 winning percentage through the rest of the year, we'll end up with 22 wins.  Which, should put us right in line for another top 8 pick or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CarrRun49 said:

Also good news... we're 4-12 in our last 16.  They're playing how we thought they would the whole season.  If they take their .250 winning percentage through the rest of the year, we'll end up with 22 wins.  Which, should put us right in line for another top 8 pick or so.

But the average wins or cumulative should keep us in the top few.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Projected finishes from Fangraphs

https://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=Standings

             
Orioles 36 16 20 .444 -19 4.72 5.25 24 9 15 .392 -27 4.50 5.64 25 35 .423 -46 4.63 5.41
Nationals 34 12 22 .353 -16 4.56 5.03 26 13 13 .513 3 5.02 4.89 25 35 .422 -13 4.76 4.97
Diamondbacks 37 14 23 .378 -34 4.14 5.05 23 11 12 .472 -7 4.76 5.05 25 35 .414 -41 4.38 5.05
Mariners 37 15 22 .405 -43 4.22 5.38 23 9 14 .396 -23 4.05 5.07 24 36 .402 -66 4.15 5.26
Royals 37 14 23 .378 -32 3.84 4.70 23 10 13 .432 -16 4.52 5.21 24 36 .399 -48 4.10 4.90
Rangers 35 13 22 .371 -58 3.63 5.29 25 11 14 .422 -20 4.35 5.13 24 36 .392 -78 3.93 5.22
Angels 37 12 25 .324 -29 4.73 5.51 23 11 12 .490 -2 4.83 4.92 23 37 .388 -31 4.77 5.29
Red Sox 37 12 25 .324 -62 4.59 6.27 23 11 12 .468 -8 4.92 5.26 23 37 .379 -70 4.72 5.88
Pirates 34 10 24 .294 -52 4.03 5.56 26 11 15 .420 -21 4.31 5.11 21 39 .349 -73 4.15 5.36
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, weams said:

Projected finishes from Fangraphs

https://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=Standings

             
Orioles 36 16 20 .444 -19 4.72 5.25 24 9 15 .392 -27 4.50 5.64 25 35 .423 -46 4.63 5.41
Nationals 34 12 22 .353 -16 4.56 5.03 26 13 13 .513 3 5.02 4.89 25 35 .422 -13 4.76 4.97
Diamondbacks 37 14 23 .378 -34 4.14 5.05 23 11 12 .472 -7 4.76 5.05 25 35 .414 -41 4.38 5.05
Mariners 37 15 22 .405 -43 4.22 5.38 23 9 14 .396 -23 4.05 5.07 24 36 .402 -66 4.15 5.26
Royals 37 14 23 .378 -32 3.84 4.70 23 10 13 .432 -16 4.52 5.21 24 36 .399 -48 4.10 4.90
Rangers 35 13 22 .371 -58 3.63 5.29 25 11 14 .422 -20 4.35 5.13 24 36 .392 -78 3.93 5.22
Angels 37 12 25 .324 -29 4.73 5.51 23 11 12 .490 -2 4.83 4.92 23 37 .388 -31 4.77 5.29
Red Sox 37 12 25 .324 -62 4.59 6.27 23 11 12 .468 -8 4.92 5.26 23 37 .379 -70 4.72 5.88
Pirates 34 10 24 .294 -52 4.03 5.56 26 11 15 .420 -21 4.31 5.11 21 39 .349 -73 4.15 5.36

Not saying they will be wrong, but funny how fangraphs has the Orioles finishing the worse out of all these teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It'll be a lot of people crowing about how the team didn't pick the guy they wanted.  And griping with Elias' draft strategy.

That's what you think. I'm preemptively mad that he took the guy all the experts wanted him to take. What good is a GM if he's just reading off the sportswriters' mock drafts?!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...