Jump to content

State of the System: Middle Infield - Grade C+


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

Have to love an analysis that says Elias should "address this through the draft" when he just spent the 30th overall pick in the 2020 draft on an SEC shortstop.  There is much more minor league talent in the system at SS/2B than in the OF - frankly, IMO, it's not close.

We do not have major league long term solutions at these positions and that is where the middle infield should be down-graded, but we have plenty of good drafted talent there in the minors.

I think part of the issue is that the ones that we have seen play in the minors are not a lock to stay at short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Have to love an analysis that says Elias should "address this through the draft" when he just spent the 30th overall pick in the 2020 draft on an SEC shortstop.  There is much more minor league talent in the system at SS/2B than in the OF - frankly, IMO, it's not close.

We do not have major league long term solutions at these positions and that is where the middle infield should be down-graded, but we have plenty of good drafted talent there in the minors.

More talent in the MI vs OF?  Interesting thought.

Kjerstad has the highest ceiling of any of the players imo.  The only one close to Gunnar and he likely (although not definitely) will end up at third.

I would put the upside of Diaz ahead of all except Gunnar (again if he stays) and maybe Westburg, assuming he stays at SS. We don’t really know what we have in Westburg yet.  If he continues how he played in the SEC, he will be lucky to get past AA.  He may be he biggest wild card in our organization, outside of any of the young Intl guys that could develop.  

I do agree that once you get past Kjerstad and Diaz, that the MI talent depth is better.  The only player beyond those 2 that I think is “exciting” is Haskin and he has a ways to go in his development.  Like Westburg, he is a big wild card who perhaps would have gone much higher if they played a college season this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Westburg was taken 30th overall - that's end of the first round.  Westburg, Gunnar, Hall - all early picks, plus Servideo, Hernaiz, Ortiz, Vavra and then a lower tier of McCoy, Bannon and others like Grenier.

Considering the OF represents three positions and the middle infield two, I think our prospect coverage in the middle infield - even if you push Gunnar to 3B - is superior to the OF.

Again, here like other positions, if we add a normal representation of international prospects in a couple of years, our quality and depth in the middle infield becomes a strength.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the grade is generous. I liked Hernaiz before Covid. Westburg and Vavra are nice additions, but don't exactly profile as first division starters. This is a part of the organization that basically profiles as "could have some talent, but nothing special is apparent yet." That's a C- at best for me, and that's if you like Vavra, Westburg and Hernaiz beyond what their production has shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2020 at 5:24 PM, hoosiers said:

Have to love an analysis that says Elias should "address this through the draft" when he just spent the 30th overall pick in the 2020 draft on an SEC shortstop.  There is much more minor league talent in the system at SS/2B than in the OF - frankly, IMO, it's not close.

We do not have major league long term solutions at these positions and that is where the middle infield should be down-graded, but we have plenty of good drafted talent there in the minors.

He's definitely taken quite a few SS who may have to move to 3B/2B in the last two drafts. Gunnar Henderson, Joseph Ortiz, and Darell Hernaiz in 2019. Then Westburg and Servideo in 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2020 at 10:14 PM, BohKnowsBmore said:

He's definitely taken quite a few SS who may have to move to 3B/2B in the last two drafts. Gunnar Henderson, Joseph Ortiz, and Darell Hernaiz in 2019. Then Westburg and Servideo in 2020.

Why do any of them need to move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2020 at 8:45 PM, wildcard said:

He is equal to or better than Alberto at 2nd defensively and he is a better hitter.  Better power.  791 OPS deserves more opportunity.  And Valaika will be cheaper than Alberto.   Alberto has has two seasons to show he can hit righties and has not.  Time to give someone else a chance.  Valaika is next in line.

I'm sure I've pointed this out six or eight times, but Alberto and Valaika are the same age and Alberto has an 81 OPS+, Valaika a 72.  The only way you can peg Valaika as definitively a better hitter is if you ignore everything before 2020, when Valaika had an unacceptable .656 OPS in Colorado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2020 at 2:07 PM, LookinUp said:

I think the grade is generous. I liked Hernaiz before Covid. Westburg and Vavra are nice additions, but don't exactly profile as first division starters. This is a part of the organization that basically profiles as "could have some talent, but nothing special is apparent yet." That's a C- at best for me, and that's if you like Vavra, Westburg and Hernaiz beyond what their production has shown.

I think this entire series is based on ceiling without any real thought given to likelihood of reaching that ceiling.  So an average team at an average position will be something like a B or B+.  But even on that scale giving the Orioles a C+ here is pretty generous since no one in the organization is terribly likely to be playing middle infield for the Orioles in the majors in three years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Middle infield defense feels like one of those aspects of the game where the deltas between what is and isn't behind the curtain are bigger.

It'll be magnificent if Henderson develops as a solid or plus SS two-way player, and I imagine the coaches will have a lot to do with it.  Bobby Dickerson got a shoutout on last night's Padres-Dodgers telecast for tightening Tatis's screws as it was also recollected that he was Manny's infield guy back in the day.

My memory is the knock on Nolan Arenado coming up was that he was a bad 3B and well, here we are.

My armchair guess is Servideo is the only one with real MLB SS game and it's 80% likely he won't hit enough (better than Grenier's 95%-some).  I'll be bummed if two early Rutschman runs in 2022-2023 get hindered trying to see if someone in the org now can grow into like a 1.5 WAR shortstop so the payroll can stay well south of $75M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2020 at 10:14 PM, BohKnowsBmore said:

He's definitely taken quite a few SS who may have to move to 3B/2B in the last two drafts. Gunnar Henderson, Joseph Ortiz, and Darell Hernaiz in 2019. Then Westburg and Servideo in 2020.

 

7 hours ago, weams said:

Why do any of them need to move?

Just seems to be a somewhat common note in draft profiles for some (not necessarily all) of them. To be clear, I think this seems like a generally good approach to the draft on offense, taking SS/CF/C that can hit and if they need to slide down the defensive spectrum, so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

 

Just seems to be a somewhat common note in draft profiles for some (not necessarily all) of them. To be clear, I think this seems like a generally good approach to the draft on offense, taking SS/CF/C that can hit and if they need to slide down the defensive spectrum, so be it.

There is also just the fact that the better overall infield prospects are predominantly playing shortstop when drafted.

Not a lot of HS second basemen being looked at as viable professional prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...