Jump to content

Update: Orioles sign 17 international players highlighted by Basallo and Hernandez


connja

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Well you can’t trade this year.

Poorly and irresponsible is paying 1M over market just so you can say you get a top ranked guy.  That is what Roll Tide has advocated.  That is not only paying the player too much (in comparison to market rate) but it also greatly reduces your ability to sign other guys.

This is all about perspective. I don’t ever expect you to admit you had anything wrong. It’s okay as I know that’s who you are! 
 

I adamantly disagree with the notion that you let ownership pocket the money which is what the Angelos group has done in prior years never to be seen again. 
 

Looking at Frobby’s list I mentioned Guerrero Jr and Tatis Jr as pretty good bets and guys that I’d have thrown an extra million at to try and coax them into signing here-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

This is all about perspective. I don’t ever expect you to admit you had anything wrong. It’s okay as I know that’s who you are! 
 

I adamantly disagree with the notion that you let ownership pocket the money which is what the Angelos group has done in prior years never to be seen again. 
 

Looking at Frobby’s list I mentioned Guerrero Jr and Tatis Jr as pretty good bets and guys that I’d have thrown an extra million at to try and coax them into signing here-

What am I wrong about?  I love how you say stuff like this.  It’s another part of tour schtick.  Next thing you know you will want to get money on an Intl FA being good.

Lol..and I love how you pick out 2 guys who you know the outcomes of to determine that you would have thrown more money at them.

Guess what..the team who gave that money to Tatis didn’t even keep him.  They traded him for an over the hill James Shields.  That tells you about how good they thought he was at the time but yet you knew then you would have overpaid.  Lol.  That’s absurd.  You didn’t even know who the hell he was.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baseballamerica.com/stories/top-40-international-bonuses-of-2015/%3famphtml
 

Since you knew/know so much about these guys, I assume you have overpaid for the guys on this list too?  (Yes I know you will pick out vlad jr..I’m talking about pretty much everyone else). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What am I wrong about?  I love how you say stuff like this.  It’s another part of tour schtick.  Next thing you know you will want to get money on an Intl FA being good.

Lol..and I love how you pick out 2 guys who you know the outcomes of to determine that you would have thrown more money at them.

Guess what..the team who gave that money to Tatis didn’t even keep him.  They traded him for an over the hill James Shields.  That tells you about how good they thought he was at the time but yet you knew then you would have overpaid.  Lol.  That’s absurd.  You didn’t even know who the hell he was.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baseballamerica.com/stories/top-40-international-bonuses-of-2015/%3famphtml
 

Since you knew/know so much about these guys, I assume you have overpaid for the guys on this list too?  (Yes I know you will pick out vlad jr..I’m talking about pretty much everyone else). 

Your the king of Schtick sir!

Tatis and Guerrero had MLB bloodlines .... So their success was reasonably likely. Why wouldn't you throw extra money at them to try get them in our system?

Sometimes you trade assets to get MLB assets ...so why that matter?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Your the king of Schtick sir!

Tatis and Guerrero had MLB bloodlines .... So their success was reasonably likely. Why wouldn't you throw extra money at them to try get them in our system?

Sometimes you trade assets to get MLB assets ...so why that matter?

 

So because their dads were good at baseball, that means they were going to be?

So, you think we should have thrown a lot more money and drafted Ryan Ripken far sooner? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So because their dads were good at baseball, that means they were going to be?

So, you think we should have thrown a lot more money and drafted Ryan Ripken far sooner? 

So obviously there are outliers and no the son of a former player doesn't automatically assure success.

Example ..... I am athletic! When I was in school I player a sport each season and even played soccer and football at the same time one year. After high school I played softball several nights per week from my early 20s until my wheels fell off around age 38. My brother on the other had is a puny geek who doesn't like to go outside. At times its hard to imagine that we are from the same gene pool!

Ok ...I'm rambling, but my point is there are no guarantees that the athletic abilities will convey. With that said, In many cases they do ...Biggio is also a very good player , Griffey, Fielder etc etc

Your scouts would determine if said player had baseball instincts.... I know the Orioles wasted money an resources on Hargroves relative etc in the past. Probably mostly as a courtesy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

So obviously there are outliers and no the son of a former player doesn't automatically assure success.

Example ..... I am athletic! When I was in school I player a sport each season and even played soccer and football at the same time one year. After high school I played softball several nights per week from my early 20s until my wheels fell off around age 38. My brother on the other had is a puny geek who doesn't like to go outside. At times its hard to imagine that we are from the same gene pool!

Ok ...I'm rambling, but my point is there are no guarantees that the athletic abilities will convey. With that said, In many cases they do ...Biggio is also a very good player , Griffey, Fielder etc etc

Your scouts would determine if said player had baseball instincts.... I know the Orioles wasted money an resources on Hargroves relative etc in the past. Probably mostly as a courtesy.

 

So, if you admit that there is basically no correlation between an athletic father and their kid, why mention it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

So, if you admit that there is basically no correlation between an athletic father and their kid, why mention it?

Seriously? What a silly response Rob

There certainly can be! But not in every case. In Ryan Ripken's case (being hypothetical) he rolled a pretty low score on the hereditary dice roll. But, in many cases as I already mentioned Bonds, Griffey, Fielder, Guerrero, Tatis the abilities were transferred. As I mentioned, a scout obviously needed to evaluate the player to determine that. Since we probably didn't have any at the time in the international arena you could throw money into the wind on worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Seriously? What a silly response Rob

There certainly can be! But not in every case. In Ryan Ripken's case (being hypothetical) he rolled a pretty low score on the hereditary dice roll. But, in many cases as I already mentioned Bonds, Griffey, Fielder, Guerrero, Tatis the abilities were transferred. As I mentioned, a scout obviously needed to evaluate the player to determine that. Since we probably didn't have any at the time in the international arena you could throw money into the wind on worse.

So it can be..or maybe it can’t.  

So really, it’s a complete crap shoot yet you made it seem like it’s a reason to throw extra money at a player.

Makes perfect sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...