Jump to content

Jorge Lopez keeps improving


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Lopez made 6 starts in May and had a 3.68 ERA in 29.1 IP   His last 2 starts have been 6 IP.   Two other starts were 5 innings or more.   His WHIP in May was still quite high at 1.43 so he still has work to do in the area.  This is a huge improvement of his April 7.48 ERA.

If Lopez continues to improve he is positioning himself to stay in the starting rotation and be part of the 2022 team.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Lopez made 6 starts in May and had a 3.68 ERA in 29.1 IP   His last 2 starts have been 6 IP.   Two other starts were 5 innings or more.   His WHIP in May was still quite high at 1.43 so he still has work to do in the area.  This is a huge improvement of his April 7.48 ERA.

If Lopez continues to improve he is positioning himself to stay in the starting rotation and be part of the 2022 team.

I don't know about 2022 but he's going to most likely get all of 2021 to show what he's capable of. I'm glad he's showing improvement...any positive in this season is a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wildcard and the curious case of the small sample size.

While I can appreciate the optimism, Lopez has a long way to go before we can count him for any future plans.  It was a good month for him from some perspectives but in fairness, wildcard noted that the WHIP was pretty high.  

We'll see if he can keep it up but I'm not really getting my hopes up.  He's shown that he is what he is over the course of his career.  Without any drastic changes, he'll probably be able to continue to be that guy with spurts of reasonably good performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said in a thread ar the end of April when people were calling for Jorge to be benched that his underlying statistics showed abpitcher who was going to improve, and he has done that.  That said, without some changes in his pitch mix, which largely show similar movement, he is a little capped at what could be a league average pitcher.  He weirdly, in a world where spin rate is king, ranks in the 1st percentile (bad) for spin rate on his FB.

Conversely, I also said in that thread that we are about to see some Matt Harvey regression, and we have, but to those calling for Harvey to be jettisoned I would say his underlying statitistics (things like keeping balls off barrels and hard hit rate, xERA) suggest he might be better off than Lopez long term.  In fact other than. His current 3 game skid Harvey's last 250 PA suggest a very positive trend. 

Both are about league average pitchers at their best, and that can be valuable.  Would love to see them be able to pitch with a margin of error that us not razor thin (i.e. time for some bats and bullpen to show up).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

wildcard and the curious case of the small sample size.

While I can appreciate the optimism, Lopez has a long way to go before we can count him for any future plans.  It was a good month for him from some perspectives but in fairness, wildcard noted that the WHIP was pretty high.  

We'll see if he can keep it up but I'm not really getting my hopes up.  He's shown that he is what he is over the course of his career.  Without any drastic changes, he'll probably be able to continue to be that guy with spurts of reasonably good performance.

I said if he continues to improve.    And there is nothing about SSS in that statement.   They changed his delivery to the point that he is hitting 96/97 mph with control regularly.   His off speed pitches have been showing good control.   I am encouraged but he has to keep doing it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I said if he continues to improve.    And there is nothing about SSS in that statement.   They changed his delivery to the point that he is hitting 96/97 mph with control regularly.   His off speed pitches have been showing good control.   I am encouraged but he has to keep doing it.

Haha, you're right, I forgot who I'm dealing with here.  6 starts and 29.1 IP to a 3.68 ERA is a small sample size for anyone else but it's rather large for you.

I'm not as encouraged due to the 1.4 WHIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Haha, you're right, I forgot who I'm dealing with here.  6 starts and 29.1 IP to a 3.68 ERA is a small sample size for anyone else but it's rather large for you.

I'm not as encouraged due to the 1.4 WHIP.

Its the recap on the month of May.    How the heck do you make it bigger than a month?  Just keep the pessimism coming Moose. Maybe you and Corn can get together and have a doldrum party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Its the recap on the month of May.    How the heck do you make it bigger than a month?  Just keep the pessimism coming Moose. Maybe you and Corn can get together and have a doldrum party.

I don't think I'm out of line in suggesting that one month of pitching is a small sample size, wildcard.   How the heck do you make it bigger than a month?  Look at his whole season so far, that's how.  Even then, it's still a pretty small sample size.  

You can call it pessimism, I call it reality.  Lopez hasn't been a good pitcher for most of his career.  I will agree with you there's some upside, particularly if the Orioles wanted to use him as a guy who only goes twice through a lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Haha, you're right, I forgot who I'm dealing with here.  6 starts and 29.1 IP to a 3.68 ERA is a small sample size for anyone else but it's rather large for you.

I'm not as encouraged due to the 1.4 WHIP.

1.4 WHIP does not worry me as much.  Lopez has a very good overall walk rate.  It does suggest he is giving up more hits, but the quality of those hits and the defense matters.  At 51% GB rate, give him the 2014 Orioles infield defense and you have a pitcher who is at or even above league average.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I said if he continues to improve.    And there is nothing about SSS in that statement.   They changed his delivery to the point that he is hitting 96/97 mph with control regularly.   His off speed pitches have been showing good control.   I am encouraged but he has to keep doing it.

His str% is below league average. His walk rate is high. He isnt showing control regularly.

He has shown some moderate improvements this month.  He also got to face a struggling twins team twice (although they are currently 12th in the league in runs), the Nats who are have a terrible offense and he faced Boston in the final game of a series where it looked like their offense was sleepwalking though the game.  An unusual game for them swinging at a lot of pitches, early outs, etc...still, he has looked a little better in a very small sample size.
 

He’s still not a ML starter and should be in the pen, where he is more valuable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't think I'm out of line in suggesting that one month of pitching is a small sample size, wildcard.   How the heck do you make it bigger than a month?  Look at his whole season so far, that's how.  Even then, it's still a pretty small sample size.  

You can call it pessimism, I call it reality.  Lopez hasn't been a good pitcher for most of his career.  I will agree with you there's some upside, particularly if the Orioles wanted to use him as a guy who only goes twice through a lineup. 

Another negative post by Moose.  No surprise there.   You basically don't understand what is occurring with Lopez.   They changed his mechanic and his approach to be more aggressive in the strike zone.  Its been a process since the beginning of the season.   He has steady improve how deep he is going into game for 4 innings to now 6 innings  in his last two outings.  

I get that he can't understand that.  Its a pity that you can't and just wallow in your negativity.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

1.4 WHIP does not worry me as much.  Lopez has a very good overall walk rate.  It does suggest he is giving up more hits, but the quality of those hits and the defense matters.  At 51% GB rate, give him the 2014 Orioles infield defense and you have a pitcher who is at or even above league average.

His Bb rate is 4..that’s not very good.

His BABiP is basically in the range of expectations, so he hasn’t been unlucky in that regards either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Another negative post by Moose.  No surprise there.   You basically don't understand what is occurring with Lopez.   They changed his mechanic and his approach to be more aggressive in the strike zone.  Its been a process since the beginning of the season.   He has steady improve how deep he is going into game for 4 innings to now 6 innings  in his last two outings.  

I get that he can't understand that.  Its a pity that you can't and just wallow in your negativity.

Live look-in at me wallowing in my negativity:

IllfatedReliableBaleenwhale-size_restric

Again, you can call it negativity, I'll call it reality.  Maybe Lopez is trending up, and if so that's great.  Chances are he's probably not.  

If I don't understand what's occurring with Lopez, you don't understand small sample sizes.  

Fine, WC, what are we betting that Lopez is making some sort of miraculous transition?  You set the terms, as long as they're past something like 12 more starts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

His str% is below league average. His walk rate is high. He isnt showing control regularly.

He has shown some moderate improvements this month.  He also got to face a struggling twins team twice (although they are currently 12th in the league in runs), the Nats who are have a terrible offense and he faced Boston in the final game of a series where it looked like their offense was sleepwalking though the game.  An unusual game for them swinging at a lot of pitches, early outs, etc...still, he has looked a little better in a very small sample size.
 

He’s still not a ML starter and should be in the pen, where he is more valuable.

 

The Twins are 8th in the MLB in OPS.   Nats are 15th which should be about average. Boston is 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...